If we accept that the boomers were born from 1945 to 1960, and that the mimimum age for receiving non-disability SSI is fifty-nine, they're already half-covered by SSI now. If that were the main cause, I'd expect to see the bar graph level off. cn
from personal experience i can tell you, those of us who sacrificed our bodies doing the hard physical labour which puts food on your tables, and keeps your toyotas running, and your lights on have been struck hard by this thing you guys call an "economic downturn"
those of us with real injuries who have continued to work, trying to make a better life for ourselves were the first to get layed off, and are the last to get hired when things start moving forward again. the result is an entire army of working class stiffs who cant work any more not because they are unwilling, but because we are not wanted. why hire a 40 year old cripple when you can hire a 20 year old kid who can bale more hay, and doesnt need a leg brace or a cane.
Thats why so many people are getting disability now. disabbility generally pays 1/2 of your wage or less, and if you were scraping by on 400 a week now you gotta squeeze twice as hard on 200 or less, plus the mindnumbing boredom, but if you get even a piddly useless job like mine, you dont qualify for disability. i get a few bucks more on my job than disability would pay, so i work through the pain. thanks america, nice job. at least the outgoing ceo of a failing car company gets his golden parachute at the expense of the taxpayers, and the union assholes get to keep cashing fat ass checks for sitting on their asses in the "Labour Banks"
and strangely enough is STILL dont believe the socialists and communists or the anarcho-bullshittists lies.