wyteberrywidow
Global
Thank you as that's my only point 400 watts or lower LEDs will rock but for a larger scale bid
Ahh k. So which LED company you working for?? *jks*Hey man, yopu CAN´T judge led technology based on crappy panels. All of those, are cheap chinese panels. Almost all have Epistar or Bridgelux leds... those won't do the magic. To see real improvment, you HAVE to go for high quality leds, such as CREE, Osram, Lumileds, Seoul, etc. The only panels that are using these high quality leds, are: DIY Hans panels using CREE XP-E(the link i posted) Plantphotonic panels using CREE XP-E and Lumileds, EVO leds from spain, using in the past CREE XP-E now switching to Osram SSL80, Apache panels, using Osram 3W Leds (they dony specify model), Procyon, uding CREE XP-E.... and there maybe a few more out there.... but those are the very few. Almost ALL panels, re made with cheap lower efficiency leds... even the most expensive ones... those are only scams, and that's why, people like you and many others, consider this tech to be a crap! because it is the few, that have dig into led tech enough to know that the key to success in led, its not in the panel brand, it's in the leds, the diodes brand and model, where you'll see the difference. I have a friend, who made his own DIY panel, using lumileds, with 60W he pulled a 1,2 g/w yield. That was seen with my own eyes.
Why is almost noone using high quality leds? because those are 3 times the price, and most of the led companies, are only seeking profit, not performance. So they just go for the cheapest and pull heavy marketing, and many fall for it, and then they get frustrated and come here and say the tech is crap. That is the way LEDs have wom their bad reputation.
o yes, they do 70W HPS... and you could doubt his results... you can also doubt mine... but i'm seeing my buds getting dry in front of me. I said i was an average user,not a complete novice one. I've had plants before. I know more or less how it looks 50 grams when they are wet. And i'm telling you, there's clearly more than 50 grams here, i can be sure of that!. Besides.. that "fluffy" buds thing... in the past... these buds are as dense as a rock.
you can take my word, or you can doubt it, it is your choice... reality, is that i really pulled this out of this plant using a 56W led panel.
And how long did it take for me to have this plant? well.. i have a veg room, so i just picked 7 clones, put them in a 25Lt container and in 56 - 57 days of flowering, i'm harvesting this. If you wish, so you can convince yourself i'm not bullshiting here, i can show you pics of the buds, so you can see results that can maybe make you belive in this technology. You say you have never seen any good caming out of leds...maybe it would be nice if for one time, you see something worth it.
Thank you as that's my only point 400 watts or lower LEDs will rock but for a larger scale bid
That's an EXCELENT point you brought up... it all depends on your set up. For example. I built my closet. It is a 75cm X 75cm space (2,5 X 2,5) and i intend to use that for a long long time. I have two rooms in it. On the top, my veg room, and on the botom my flowering room, runing a perpetual.Better is a relative term.
Everybody's situation is different.
Here are a few observations from my situation.
I have 2 3x3 ebb and flow tables side by side. A 600 hps on one side to finish and a pro-gro 180 and 260 for the first month of 12/12.
With questionable led quality, the 400 watts of led is about equal to the 600 hps as far as I can tell.
What the problem is with my setup is the led coverage is not enough for the whole 3x3 table. Good thing the hps bleeds over to help cover the closest plants.
With these panels I would need about 600 watts of these leds to give the proper coverage in the 3x3 space, if they came in the appropriate sized enclosure.
What I have noticed is that the leds do tend to yield better quality for any given strain, and all the other good stuff with cooling, etc that you read in grow journals.
Now if good leds can be 50% more efficient than cheap Chinese, this means that the 600 watts of cheap leds could be replaced by 300 watts of the good stuff. Only problem is that this is probably a do it yourself kind of thing and it's not going to be cheap or easy.
So which is better?
well i can show some resin development of some i have inside... take a look.yes post pics I want quality. If leds are how to get it I want to see pics.
I wish there was a way to hit the like button more than once!!well i can show some resin development of some i have inside... take a look.
I wish there was a way to hit the like button more than once!!
It definitely depends on personal favor, if i like LEDs, i will try it, if i like HID, i will buy it. I don't think which one is better or which one is worse. This is really very unworthy arguing.
Yes, because you like it. I love both of them, currently i am running two CFL in my veg room and three LED lamps in the flower room. Both of them are working fine and helpful.no no !! LEDs are better!!!
I also belive arguing is unworthy, yet, from all the discussion, some interesting things rise up, and in the end, everyone should just try to get all the info they could from every discussion... the arguing and stuff.. should be left aside... but there is worthy information always coming up in every discussion that will always help everybody expand their knowledge.It definitely depends on personal favor, if i like LEDs, i will try it, if i like HID, i will buy it. I don't think which one is better or which one is worse. This is really very unworthy arguing.