trayvan martin

UncleBuck

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member
londonfog said:
you have to be fucking joking...No one is to blame but Zimm...He should have just went home to Jelly Shellie and Trayvon would have been able to enjoy his skittle and ice-tea. Zimmerman should not have tried to play cop.
Click to expand...
zimm should not have gone on the offense against this innocent kid and furthermore should not have lied about it so much after.
 
B

budleydoright

Well-Known Member
desert dude said:
I realize that, but that does not lessen the fact that he is over charged.
Click to expand...

He's being "over charged" for over reacting and over reaching. and they always go for the jugular and throw anything they think will stick, zimmy isn't getting any special treatment to appease the blacks...... plus our blacks arent like that, remember?
 
UncleBuck

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member
budleydoright said:
He's being "over charged" for over reacting and over reaching. and they always go for the jugular and throw anything they think will stick, zimmy isn't getting any special treatment to appease the blacks...... plus our blacks arent like that, remember?
Click to expand...
not according to desert dude. they's a bunch of no limit niggas that need to know their place and run away. only non-blacks are afforded self defense.
 
londonfog

londonfog

Well-Known Member
desert dude said:
Circular argument, LF. The fact is, the justice system has an obligation to bring charges that are warranted and nothing more than that. This is a political prosecution.
Click to expand...
Hate to bust your bubble but they may have a case for Murder 2 here
  1. "These assholes always get away". Why did Zimm say this ??? Was he planning on not letting these assholes get away? (malice aforethought)
  2. "We don't need you to do that". Why did Zimmerman ignore the advice of the 911 operator. Was it really because he was planning on killing the assholes that always gets away (again malice aforethought)
Now do I think this is true...nope I think he is guilty of manslaughter ( heat of the moment whilst he was illegally trying to detain Trayvon), but that will be up to the jury to decide.
 
chrishydro

chrishydro

Well-Known Member
londonfog said:
Hate to bust your bubble but they may have a case for Murder 2 here
  1. "These assholes always get away". Why did Zimm say this ??? Was he planning on not letting these assholes get away? (malice aforethought)
  2. "We don't need you to do that". Why did Zimmerman ignore the advice of the 911 operator. Was it really because he was planning on killing the assholes that always gets away (again malice aforethought)
Now do I think this is true...nope I think he is guilty of manslaughter ( heat of the moment whilst he was illegally trying to detain Trayvon), but that will be up to the jury to decide.
Click to expand...
As to point number 2, he gives an exact description to the 911 operator of where he is. The shooting takes place between that spot and his truck. He was returning to the truck as he was told to do. Point 2 is out. Point 1 will have little to no bearing on the case. It will be brought up for sure but is not any type of indication that he was going to do what you say. It will force the jury to form an opinion and will be strongly objected to by the defense and most likely the judge will strike it down.

No did than Casey Anthony, they over charged him and without positive evidence, ie video tape etc, the jury will not be able to convict. Had they charged him with Manslaughter they might have gotten a conviction. I dont blame you for saying what you are saying because ABC doctored the tape at the beging so many people formed an opinion. Had they not touched it up and the world would have seen the bandages no one would have said a word.
 
londonfog

londonfog

Well-Known Member
chrishydro said:
As to point number 2, he gives an exact description to the 911 operator of where he is. The shooting takes place between that spot and his truck. He was returning to the truck as he was told to do. Point 2 is out. Point 1 will have little to no bearing on the case. It will be brought up for sure but is not any type of indication that he was going to do what you say. It will force the jury to form an opinion and will be strongly objected to by the defense and most likely the judge will strike it down.

No did than Casey Anthony, they over charged him and without positive evidence, ie video tape etc, the jury will not be able to convict. Had they charged him with Manslaughter they might have gotten a conviction. I dont blame you for saying what you are saying because ABC doctored the tape at the beging so many people formed an opinion. Had they not touched it up and the world would have seen the bandages no one would have said a word.
Click to expand...
I suggest you do some research and see how he would have been back at his truck had he returned after saying "OK" to not following. You see its part of his story that does not add up. You keep coming with these BS excuses the Zimm is going to use and you will soon see how the prosecutor is going to have his ass in court. His life( as he now knows it) is on the line FOR REAL...its not the internet with him. Lots of people think that they will get in a court room and say anything. What they fail to understand is that they have a whole TEAM of people picking through every word you say, every little piece of shit that was done... and when that shit starts to not add up..YOU'RE FUCKED.. hell for starters just ask Shellie..Zimms turn is coming.

edit: dude fuck ABC I'm going by 911 tapes, his interviews with Serino, and his video interview with Serino..shit don't add up
 
cannabineer

cannabineer

Ursus marijanus
UncleBuck said:
not everywhere, just in post #7723.
Click to expand...
I must say, UB, I just re-read the post in question. While I disagree with his weighting of the evidence, I do not see actionable indications of racism in his post. I consider your analysis a coupla posts later to be ... speculative. Jmo. cn
 
desert dude

desert dude

Well-Known Member
cannabineer said:
I must say, UB, I just re-read the post in question. While I disagree with his weighting of the evidence, I do not see actionable indications of racism in his post. I consider your analysis a coupla posts later to be ... speculative. Jmo. cn
Click to expand...
UB's a mudscuttle, his antenna ever quivering for the faint vibrations of racism. Sometimes his antennae feed him a false positive.
 
desert dude

desert dude

Well-Known Member
Come on, you gotta admit UB is a mudscuttle. There ought to be a picture of Unclebuck right next to the definition.


http://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=mudscuttle
"
mudscuttle 154 up, 4 down
A White American who seems intent upon single-handedly making reparations for every wrong Black Americans have suffered at the hands of the White Man. The keynote characteristic of the mudscuttle is that he will reflexively ascribe nobility of character to Black folk. The mudscuttle imagines his behavior indicative of enlightened sophistication, when the behavior is instead a sinister form of prejudice in which bigotry has been replaced with intransigent advocacy. A mudscuttle boss will brazenly assign choice assignments to Blacks and turn a deaf ear to the most rational requests from Whites for parity in the workplace. It is typical of the mudscuttle to express nauseating levels of adoration for famous Black people, wildly disproportionate to actual accomplishment.
"
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top