Total Head
Well-Known Member
with all the pollen chuckers flooding the market these days the idea of "breeders are always better" isn't always the case. sure there are tried and true breeders with legendary genetics, but unadulterated bagseed snobbery is not exactly enlightened. i'd say around 30% of the bagseed i've grown have been keepers (out of the females) and the rest were so-so or total crap. but that 30% is nothing to shake a stick at. if you buy from a ripoff breeder you could have the same success rate, just for a higher price.
so to recap: bagseed doesn't always suck, and all breeders don't put out quality genetics. for a newbie who's never grown and is on a budget, bagseed is an excellent choice. i've been growing for years and i still pop seeds from random sacks and even accidental offspring from my own crops.
my opinion based on my experience is that the quality of the parent plant will dictate the quality of the offspring. by this i mean that if a real stable plant somehow pollinates itself, the seeds have a good shot at being female rather than herm. with an unknown or inferior parent, not so much.
so to recap: bagseed doesn't always suck, and all breeders don't put out quality genetics. for a newbie who's never grown and is on a budget, bagseed is an excellent choice. i've been growing for years and i still pop seeds from random sacks and even accidental offspring from my own crops.
my opinion based on my experience is that the quality of the parent plant will dictate the quality of the offspring. by this i mean that if a real stable plant somehow pollinates itself, the seeds have a good shot at being female rather than herm. with an unknown or inferior parent, not so much.