Millionaire ron paul flies first class on your tax dollars

abandonconflict

Well-Known Member
fake libertarians? you mean like ronald, the one who wants the government to limit my wife's liberty to make decisions about her reproductive health?

and no, this is NOT about other people. if everyone else in congress spent a billion dollars on air travel each year, would he be a saint for only spending half a billion?

this is about ronald the millionaire, who rails against government spending, and then foists $25,000 of OUR money so he can sit in first class.
I don't like that the single exception to his "let the states decide" policy is on Abortion. I don't like that there is an exception in social liberty. The rest of that shit is useless and just sounds petty.
 

deprave

New Member
Now see, if you started off with that argument, I'd probably look at it as a reasonable point. Ron Paul is less of a hypocrite than the other options. That could make sense. But you immediately jumped on the position that Ron Paul is incorruptible and infallible. That's what makes you sound like a cult member.

The "not as bad as the other guys" can be a strong argument. But the Ron Paul is the one true omnipotent god who's incapable of doing any thing wrong stuff is why everyone looks at you like a crazy person.
well I didn't read the article...I just assumed what it was about and I have read enough huff posts articles to know..I am suprised I wasn't spot on and that they are actually running with this...
 

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member
... abortion is not a liberty issue its ... a fringe issue..
that's easy to say if you have testicles.

...you have to go through more security probably and it blows nuts...
oh, poor ronald the millionaire has to go through the same hassles and inconveniences that all americans have to. poor guy.

Now..Lets talk about important things besides methods used to commute? lol
this thread is about ronald the millionaire's penchant for spending our taxpayer dollars so he can stretch his legs and get some cookies instead of pretzels.

plenty of other ronald the millionaire's threads if you don't want to focus on his more hypocritical actions.
 

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member
Those are still made up numbers because your just making wild assumptions and the total is 27,000$ over like 4 years I believe lol...
good spot. you are right.

that is $27,621 of our taxpayer dollars that he spends so he can fly first class every two years.

so let's cut it in half: $441,936 dollars so that ronald the millionaire can stretch his legs.

you were right, i was wrong. ronald the millionaire only spent half a million of our taxpayer dollars or so to stretch his old withered legs, not $883k.
 

deprave

New Member
that's easy to say if you have testicles.



oh, poor ronald the millionaire has to go through the same hassles and inconveniences that all americans have to. poor guy.



this thread is about ronald the millionaire's penchant for spending our taxpayer dollars so he can stretch his legs and get some cookies instead of pretzels.

plenty of other ronald the millionaire's threads if you don't want to focus on his more hypocritical actions.
your right pretty much, can't disagree with that...but I still can't believe you take this seriously..lol..his disgusting actions of not risking his own money to go to work and using up 20 grand....what a filthy filthy man and a huge hypocrit lmao

Don't you know what all this evil mother fuckers are up to? If 20k for a flight plan is such a haneous act to you then you probably should see what these other politicians are up to..maybe you shoudln't you might go off the deep end.
 

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member
I don't like that the single exception to his "let the states decide" policy is on Abortion. I don't like that there is an exception in social liberty. The rest of that shit is useless and just sounds petty.
yes, this is a petty thing i posted solely to rile ron paul aficionados. you were too smart to take the bait, and i commend you.

although the abortion thing is debatable with respect to libertarian ideology, reproductive rights are generally accepted by most within the libertarian philosophy.
 

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member
your right pretty much, can't disagree with that...but I still can't believe you take this seriously..lol..his disgusting actions of not risking his own money to go to work and using up 20 grand....what a filthy filthy man and a huge hypocrit lmao
it is petty, it was meant simply to rile people like you and it worked way too predictably. but again, it is not his money, it is ours. and actuarial odds are that you will not have to cancel 25 flights a year, even as a congressman. and you can buy refundable coach tickets, too.

he is not walking the walk, even though he talks the talk.
 

abandonconflict

Well-Known Member
yes, this is a petty thing i posted solely to rile ron paul aficionados. you were too smart to take the bait, and i commend you.

although the abortion thing is debatable with respect to libertarian ideology, reproductive rights are generally accepted by most within the libertarian philosophy.
He is also a Doctor. I know authority is not the same as truth but he is an authority on the subject of female reproductive health.
 

deprave

New Member
good spot. you are right.

that is $27,621 of our taxpayer dollars that he spends so he can fly first class every two years.

so let's cut it in half: $441,936 dollars so that ronald the millionaire can stretch his legs.

you were right, i was wrong. ronald the millionaire only spent half a million of our taxpayer dollars or so to stretch his old withered legs, not $883k.
nope cause its only 4 years in total..the total that he 'owes us' is roughly 57 grand.
 

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member
He is also a Doctor. I know authority is not the same as truth but he is an authority on the subject of female reproductive health.
and yet he has said some very alarming things about it. VERY alarming. this is from his own fucking website:

"during his years in medicine, never once did he find an abortion necessary to save the life of a pregnant woman"

http://www.ronpaul2012.com/the-issues/abortion/

this honestly is frightening that a medical professional relies on anecdotal evidence over scientific evidence.
 

deprave

New Member
and yet he has said some very alarming things about it. VERY alarming. this is from his own fucking website:

"during his years in medicine, never once did he find an abortion necessary to save the life of a pregnant woman"

http://www.ronpaul2012.com/the-issues/abortion/

this honestly is frightening that a medical professional relies on anecdotal evidence over scientific evidence.
but he is medically trained, he is a doctor, he understands that abortions can be required for medical nessecity and he is not against that. Stop picking on Ron Paul on such petty shit you are like a scholyard bully..Get real..Ron Paul is not some kind of impractical moron...Ron Paul is not against abortions when the women's health is at risk and he is not against the morning after pill...Plenty of options to kill babies when needed. You can also use one of these:


100% PINE

 

Canna Sylvan

Well-Known Member
fake libertarians? you mean like ronald, the one who wants the government to limit my wife's liberty to make decisions about her reproductive health?

and no, this is NOT about other people. if everyone else in congress spent a billion dollars on air travel each year, would he be a saint for only spending half a billion?

this is about ronald the millionaire, who rails against government spending, and then foists $25,000 of OUR money so he can sit in first class.
How many times must you be told pro-life is more libertarian than the stance the so called main libertarian group's point of view? Just like you said your rights end with my fist against your face. Your rights to your body end when it involves killing another. An unborn baby, is just that unborn. It's still a baby. My heart goes out to the baby for not being wanted. Cause what did the baby do? The baby has just as much rights to live as you do. How viable is a newborn? Can it just apply for food stamps and cash aid to feed itself? The boundaries of when a unborn can survive outside the mother is changing all the time. So the only fair definition of life is conception. Why is it fair to call a one week old gestating baby a homicide if done by a criminal, but expressing HER reproductive rights when a mother murders her unwanted baby? Even in rape, sure it sucks to have that happen, but there are plenty out there born who are fucking over joyed their mother was horribly forced to have her liberty taken away. Funny thing is, this coming from an atheist, not even slightly agnostic. I have faith in No God as my savior.
 

abandonconflict

Well-Known Member
but he is medically trained, he is a doctor, he understands that abortions can be required for medical nessecity and he is not against that. Stop picking on Ron Paul on such petty shit you are like a scholyard bully..Get real..Ron Paul is not some kind of impractical moron...
Actually I believe that Ron Paul wants unborn humans protected under the constitution and thus, to outlaw abortion. I'm actually not certain exactly where he stands on the issue and I should be and for that alone, petty trolling pays off. Thanks again Uncle Buck. If he never needed to do an abortion procedure to save a woman's life, would that not indicate that he is a very skilled and talented doctor?
 

deprave

New Member
Now at 5:27 - Pay very close attention to anderson cooper, he is caught masturbating on live television:




[video=youtube_share;FKt8eJNZ1Dw]http://youtu.be/FKt8eJNZ1Dw?t=5m27s[/video]
 

Smirgen

Well-Known Member
nope cause its only 4 years in total..the total that he 'owes us' is roughly 57 grand.
well seeing that Ron Paul has returned over $140,000 from his office budget to the U.S. Treasury over that time I guess we taxpayers owe him about $83,000
 

sync0s

Well-Known Member
Actually I believe that Ron Paul wants unborn humans protected under the constitution and thus, to outlaw abortion. I'm actually not certain exactly where he stands on the issue and I should be and for that alone, petty trolling pays off. Thanks again Uncle Buck. If he never needed to do an abortion procedure to save a woman's life, would that not indicate that he is a very skilled and talented doctor?
He actually was on the View and recognized that making abortion illegal will only serve to create back door abortions. While he is pro-life, he is primarily against the federal government outlawing it.

Most libertarians are pro-choice, especially on the grounds that it isn't within the realm of the government to decide such matters. However, some can be pro-life when they have a different personal belief on what human life actually is and when the charge of murder comes into play. All libertarians agree that the government's role is protect life, so the only blur is how do we define it?
 

deprave

New Member
Actually I believe that Ron Paul wants unborn humans protected under the constitution and thus, to outlaw abortion. I'm actually not certain exactly where he stands on the issue and I should be and for that alone, petty trolling pays off. Thanks again Uncle Buck. If he never needed to do an abortion procedure to save a woman's life, would that not indicate that he is a very skilled and talented doctor?
No he is not in favor of a consitutional amendment, he thinks it should be left up to the states but personally doesn't believe in policing the morning after pill and because of his medical training understands the need for abortion in the case that the women's life is at risk, at he same time he doesn't support Roe V Wade.
 
Top