what?? ...You need to look back at your mathWhite people are 67% of the US population, so it makes sense that there would be a larger percentage!
why do you view MLK day as an attack on you?The thing I don't get is how any of this is my fault. I made zero people live in slums, I also never forced anyone into crime yet I catch the blame. I never owned a slave I never segragated anything.
I live in North Omaha ( blue on the map, thanks buck ) While there are some poor hoods, there are no projects, poverty while all around is not rampant nor tied to one race, unemployment is about 5%, if your not working you don't want to. The punks shooting people are driving nicer cars then me, have $5k in 48" wheels and low pros, so I'm not buying your argument that their shooting each other because of their poor and impoverished past!And white people (for the most part) are the ones who stole trillions of dollars crashing our economy. That's not because black people are predisposed to shooting people or white people are predisposed to stealing money, it's due to the circumstances and opportunities available to them.
Go visit some projects and see how the children there grow up. Then you're understand why things are the way they are. It's lack of hope and economic opportunity, not racial inferiority.
clearly it is because black people are inherently savages then.I live in North Omaha ( blue on the map, thanks buck ) While there are some poor hoods, there are no projects, poverty while all around is not rampant nor tied to one race, unemployment is about 5%, if your not working you don't want to. The punks shooting people are driving nicer cars then me, have $5k in 48" wheels and low pros, so I'm not buying your argument that their shooting each other because of their poor and impoverished past!
View attachment 2001664
If you have 100 people... 67 are white, 10 black, 10 Hispanic, 10 Asian and 3 other. 40% of the 100 are on assistance. % say 4 black, 4 Hispanic and 4 Asian people will be on assistance and............... drum beat..... 26.8 white people.what?? ...You need to look back at your math
It would have a larger absolute number but a lower percentile
Willyßagseed;6943956 said:Program ...............Recipients............ Black......... White
Social Security
Retirement insurance 26 Million ..........7.7%............... 90.4%
Disability insurance ...3.7 Million ..........18.3% ..............79.3%
Survivor’s benefits 1.8 Million ..............24% .................72%
Widow’s benefits ...4.9 Million ....................9% ................90.1%
Supplemental
Security Income 5.8 Million ......................26% ..............48.2%
Aid to Families with Dependent Children
...................................3.8 Million ..................39.2% ...........55.2%
Medicare ..................37 Million ..................8.1% ...............88%
Medicaid ..................33.4 Million ...............25.1% ............46.1%
Food Stamps ............27.5 Million ..............34.9%............. 42.3%
Women, Infants and Children (WIC) Food Program
...................................5.8 Million .................27.8% ..............44.3%
National Student Lunch Program
...................................44.5 Million ................17%....................75%
Veterans’ Benefits 26 Million.................... 8.0% .................86.4%
Housing Subsidies 4.7 Million ...................40%...................46%
Make up whatever you want here it is in black and white.. literally.
Your words not mine!clearly it is because black people are inherently savages then.
your implication, not mine.Your words not mine!
If you have 100 people... 67 are white, 10 black, 10 Hispanic, 10 Asian and 3 other. 40% of the 100 are on assistance. % say 4 black, 4 Hispanic and 4 Asian people will be on assistance and............... drum beat..... 26.8 white people.
Yes I know, I put the percentages below those numbers.Those numbers are the parentage of total recipients not percentage of each race. The white percentiles will be large because they make up a large portion of the population.
I dont really care who gets them. It is the generational dependence sold by our government that keeps them that way. And the benefit goes to the politicians that hand them a few bucks and tell them to vote Democrat to keep getting their dole.Willyßagseed;6944110 said:Yes I know, I put the percentages below. 63% of america is white and accounts for 61% of "welfare" recipients. 37% are minorities and receive 39%
you always say this, but you never provide evidence for your claims.I dont really care who gets them. It is the generational dependence sold by our government that keeps them that way. And the benefit goes to the politicians that hand them a few bucks and tell them to vote Democrat to keep getting their dole.
Look at the track record of the indians and the african americans.... The biggest (percentage) dole recipients in America.you always say this, but you never provide evidence for your claims.
"look" is not evidence.Look...
Well that safety net has kept a lot of people close to the bottom for a long time. If it doesnt elevate people then it doesnt work."look" is not evidence.
and welfare was not meant to create wealth or elevate people, it is meant to keep them from hitting bottom that's why they call it a "safety net" and not a "wealth trampoline"