• Here is a link to the full explanation: https://rollitup.org/t/welcome-back-did-you-try-turning-it-off-and-on-again.1104810/

Ron Paul guys, this is for....you?

bigbillyrocka

Well-Known Member
This is a copy past from yahoo news as for some reason my link wont work. Also, if someone has already posted this then I am sorry..

[h=1]In ad for newsletter, Ron Paul forecast "race war"[/h]
WASHINGTON (Reuters) - A direct-mail solicitation for Ron Paul's political and investment newsletters two decades ago warned of a "coming race war in our big cities" and of a "federal-homosexual cover-up" to play down the impact of AIDS.
The eight-page letter, which appears to carry Paul's signature at the end, also warns that the U.S. government's redesign of currency to include different colors - a move aimed at thwarting counterfeiters - actually was part of a plot to allow the government to track Americans using the "new money."
The letter urges readers to subscribe to Paul's newsletters so that he could "tell you how you can save yourself and your family" from an overbearing government.
The letter's details emerge at a time when Paul, now a contender for the Republican nomination for president, is under fire over reports that his newsletters contained racist, anti-homosexual and anti-Israel rants.
Reports of the newsletters' contents have Paul's campaign scrambling to deny that he wrote the inflammatory articles.
Among other things, the articles called the Rev. Martin Luther King Jr. a "world-class philanderer," criticized the U.S. holiday bearing King's name as "Hate Whitey Day," and said that AIDS sufferers "enjoy the attention and pity that comes with being sick."
As Paul made a campaign stop in Manchester, Iowa, on Thursday, his Iowa chairman, Drew Ivers, repeated Paul's assertions that he did not write the articles that resurfaced this week in a report in the Weekly Standard magazine.
Paul has said that he is not sure who wrote the articles that were published under his name. He has said the articles do not reflect his views, and noted that his public stances - supporting gays in the military for example - have run counter to the incendiary statements in the newsletters.
In an interview with CNN's Gloria Borger on Wednesday, Paul said of the newsletter's articles: "I didn't write them. I didn't read them at the time and I disavow them."
When Borger continued to pursue the subject, Paul removed his microphone and walked out of the interview.
"It is ridiculous to imply that Ron Paul is a bigot, racist, or unethical," Ivers said.
However, Ivers said, Paul does not deny or retract material that Paul has written under his own signature, such as the letter promoting Paul's newsletters.
When asked whether that meant Paul believed there was a government conspiracy to cover up the impact of AIDS, Ivers said, "I don't think he embraces that."
Paul's newsletters "showed good factual information and investment information," Ivers said. "It was a public service, helping people understand and equip them to avoid an unsound monetary policy."
"EXTRAORDINARY SOURCES"
The letter promoting Paul's newsletters was written about 1993. It was during a period in which Paul - who left Congress in 1985 after serving about eight years - returned to Washington after a decade's absence.
(For a PDF of the solicitation letter see http://link.reuters.com/vud75s)
The letter was provided to Reuters by James Kirchick, a contributing editor for The New Republic magazine. He says he found the letter in archives of political literature maintained by the University of Kansas and the Wisconsin Historical Society.
Early in the 2008 presidential campaign - in which Paul was a candidate - Kirchick published an article in The New Republic in which he described Paul as "not the plain-speaking antiwar activist his supporters believe they are backing - but rather a member in good standing of some of the oldest and ugliest traditions in American politics."
The letter promoting Paul's newsletters claims that Paul - through what he describes as a network of "extraordinary sources" in Congress, the White House, the Treasury and Justice departments, the Federal Reserve and the Internal Revenue Service - had acquired unique insider information that would his subscribers to "neutralize" the plans of "powerbrokers."
Paul's letter went on to describe various plots and schemes that he had "unmasked," including a "plot for world government, world money and world central banking." He also claimed to have exposed a plan by the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) to "suspend the Constitution" in a falsely declared national emergency.
Despite being "told not to talk," Paul wrote that his newsletters also "laid bare" the "Israeli lobby, which plays Congress like a cheap harmonica," and a "federal-homosexual cover-up on AIDS."
Paul claimed that his "training as a physician" helped him "see through" this alleged cover-up.
Paul also suggested that a planned U.S. currency with new notes designed to curb counterfeiting and money laundering would result in the distribution of "totalitarian bills" that "were tinted pink and blue and brown, and blighted with holograms, diffraction gratings, metal and plastic threads and chemical alarms."
Paul said the money was designed to allow authorities to "keep track of American cash and American citizens."
He urged the letter's readers to send in $99, which would buy subscriptions to his monthly political and investment newsletters, a copy of his book "Surviving the New Money," an investment manual and access to the "unlisted phone number of my Financial Hotline for fast breaking news."
(Additional reporting by Samuel P. Jacobs in Manchester, Iowa; Editing by David Lindsey and Eric Walsh)
 

deprave

New Member
LoL yea we have been over it repeatedly, first off Ron Paul didn't actually write that, secondly its not even that racist or even true, Ron Paul actually did vote for MLK day, its partially because of Ron Paul that we have MLK day. MLK being one of Ron Paul's biggest heroes, he has given many speeches about MLK.

Not only did he not even write that but he didn't even read it till over a decade later when it was brought up, Minorities overwhelmingly support Ron Paul as they should... not just because he sticks up for them time and time again in both his actions and words, not just because he wants to end the drug war effectively crippling racism and pardoning non-violent criminals from prison, but because Ron Paul's philosophy is effectively the farthest anti-racist that you can be, only anarchist are more anti-racist then Ron Paul.

Let me give it to your straight, The Republican's don't like Ron Paul, The Democrats don't like Ron Paul, the people LOVE Ron Paul. Dr Paul is a threat to both parties. President of the NAACP and other black leaders have pledged their support for Ron Paul repeatedly and they claim Ron Paul is not a racist.
 

bigbillyrocka

Well-Known Member
This was from a report about 4 hours ago. either way, thought it was interesting. I For one am for him and dont hold judgement of ones past only ones present.
 

deprave

New Member
either way, he didn't even write it, that alone makes it irrelevant, add to the fact that his actions, his words, and philosophy actually make it impossible for him to have wrote such a thing....It is really quite silly...

and yes this has been coming out a lot lately because Ron Paul is in 1st place and 2nd place in many states, Republican's are scared to death of Ron Paul and Democrats just like to call Republican's racist, but yeah this has been re-hashed over and over for decades, there is plenty of documentation covering this and its not new at all. Ron Paul has been elected 10 times since this came out.
 

bigbillyrocka

Well-Known Member
Well theres always something in someones past thats either true or not that come out at this time of year (every 4). Some a fallacy, some true. Just proves what people are willing to spin to lead people astray. amazing really.
 

bigbillyrocka

Well-Known Member
im not against paul. i just wanted to see what people thought about this spin. i happened to read it earlier and thought, "hmm i wonder what the good people at RIU think?"
 

RyanTheRhino

Well-Known Member
Well theres always something in someones past thats either true or not that come out at this time of year (every 4). Some a fallacy, some true. Just proves what people are willing to spin to lead people astray. amazing really.
This is up there with Obamba not having a birth certificate smear
 

deprave

New Member
its sad this is the only "Dirt" they have on Ron Paul lmao, people aren't buying this, this is only good for Ron Paul because he is getting attention.
 

bigbillyrocka

Well-Known Member
its sad this is the only "Dirt" they have on Ron Paul lmao, people aren't buying this, this is only good for Ron Paul because he is getting attention.
Exactly! They say (and im a firm believer in) that even bad attention is good attention.
 

massah

Well-Known Member
LOL Gingrich and Romney digging at straws now to try and make shit up about Paul eh? Lawl...if you can't find something bad about someone in their past...make it up...typical dirty politics as usual :D
 

bigbillyrocka

Well-Known Member
Right? shit, ive got nothing in my past but if i were to run for president id make shit up about myself! hahaha also, id tell the truth about Marijuana since it ISNT BAD....
 

NoDrama

Well-Known Member
That isn't Ron Paul's signature in that PDF link, its just a stamp. No one put a pen to paper to do that.

Check it out...

Ron Paul fake signature.png or
Please note how different the letters are, especially how the "P" has a loop at the bottom and does not connect to the main body, also note how the "U" and the "O" are squished. Handwriting analyst I am not, but I play one on TV.

Basically a 3rd grader could have put the RP signature on just about anything.
 

RyanTheRhino

Well-Known Member
I don't really see how the war on drugs is racist other than minority statistics . It's not like a certain race is focrced to smoke trees.
However I believe people should not go to jail for non violent crimes. Only theif & violence
 

bigbillyrocka

Well-Known Member
I don't really see how the war on drugs is racist other than minority statistics . It's not like a certain race is focrced to smoke trees.
However I believe people should not go to jail for non violent crimes. Only theif & violence
im not religious whatsoever but Amen...
 

Smirgen

Well-Known Member
Ron Paul endorsed Cynthia McKinney in 2008.

Ron Paul praised Martin Luther King Jr. throughout his entire political career.

Ron Paul spent his entire political career fighting the war on drugs, with the black community being one of it's biggest group of victims. He gave a speech against the war on drugs and it ended with roaring ovation by a crowd of mixed colors, INCLUDING blacks.

Ron Paul offered his own money to start a collection pot in congress to pay for a medal specifically for Rosa Parks only to be rejected by the entire house leaving him to be the ONLY ONE willing to use his own money, and not the taxpayers', to fund this award?

Ron Paul built and maintained a medical practice that served patients for free if they couldn't afford it.. INCLUDING BLACK PEOPLE.


^^Not the actions of a racist IMO.

P.S. Welcome to the politics section of RIU Bigbillyrocka.
 

deprave

New Member
I don't really see how the war on drugs is racist other than minority statistics . It's not like a certain race is focrced to smoke trees.
However I believe people should not go to jail for non violent crimes. Only theif & violence
Its racist cause it enables cops to be racist and search people just cause they don't like the color of their skin.
 

deprave

New Member
Let me be a little more specific, its racist because some prosecutors in the south raid black projects to be the hero and "kick the niggers out of town", they plants drugs on them and send them to jail..things like this are fairly well documented.
 
Top