I know you don't mean that...lol...demand creates jobswe have to keep cutting taxes on the top 10%. they don't have enough money and they NEED these tax cuts so they can keep creating jobs.
companies that have employees or if they do hire, should get a tax credit. Rich people with no employees and don't plan on getting some then I say go ahead and tax the shit out of themwe have to keep cutting taxes on the top 10%. they don't have enough money and they NEED these tax cuts so they can keep creating jobs.
Yeah because that has nothing to do with the Recession which really should be called the Second Great Depression. Nope, It has to be those damn illegals.with 1 in 7 people on food stamps now, taxpayers are having trouble keeping up with the demand.
NEW YORK (CNNMoney.com) -- The use of food stamps has increased dramatically in the U.S., as the federal government ramps up basic assistance to meet the demands of an increasingly desperate population.
The number of food stamp recipients increased 16% over last year. This means that 14% of the population is now living on food stamps. That's about 43 million people, or about one out of every seven Americans
In some states, like Tennessee, Mississippi, New Mexico and Oregon, one in five people are receiving food stamps. Washington, D.C. leads the nation, with 21.5% of the population on food stamps.
No one person or group of people is the complete problem. You shouldn't be so shallow minded.Yeah because that has nothing to do with the Recession which really should be called the Second Great Depression. Nope, It has to be those damn illegals.
I don't know if your comment was directed at me or someone else, but in my particular case, it does contribute to driving down wages. I'm in a Union and about six or seven years ago we were trying to negotiate a raise for our forklift drivers. The company said that our forklift drivers were already making more than the forklift drivers from several nearby companies. Those nearby companies were like the one I described. Ones that only hire illegals so they can treat them like shit and pay them very little because they know that these guys will never turn them in out of fear and most can't quit because good companies won't hire illegals.driving down wages for everybody else??
what's driving down wages is something called the bottom line. which says that if the company isn't making billions upon billions in profit... then it's not performing up to par.
also driving down wages is worker's reduced ability to unionize and the continued push by republicans to take away unions ability to negotiate a greater share of corporate profits for its workers.
FACT.
If you are in a Union then you know why Unions are also trying to Organize the IllegalsI don't know if your comment was directed at me or someone else, but in my particular case, it does contribute to driving down wages. I'm in a Union and about six or seven years ago we were trying to negotiate a raise for our forklift drivers. The company said that our forklift drivers were already making more than the forklift drivers from several nearby companies. Those nearby companies were like the one I described. Ones that only hire illegals so they can treat them like shit and pay them very little because they know that these guys will never turn them in out of fear and most can't quit because good companies won't hire illegals.
I agree with you on the other reasons why wages are low in this country.
wow. I am more right than I had realized at firstdriving down wages for everybody else??
what's driving down wages is something called the bottom line. which says that if the company isn't making billions upon billions in profit... then it's not performing up to par.
also driving down wages is worker's reduced ability to unionize and the continued push by republicans to take away unions ability to negotiate a greater share of corporate profits for its workers.
FACT.
thank you for the lack of vagueness.wow. I am more right than I had realized at first
Your article was funded by this groupIf you haven’t figured it out by now, public sector unions are not the friend of the taxpayer. Now, this isn’t saying that all union members deserve your contempt, but pretty much all union officials do. They are in it for their own money and power. Way down the line are their concerns about their union members, and if they are teachers unions, students don’t even show up on the radar. Americans are finally awakening to the truth by witnessing the protests in Madison, WI. As Democrat senators flee the state to avoid casting a vote on rolling back union benefits and their collective bargaining rules, Americans can see that that party is now being run by the unions, not the other way around. They want to raise taxes on you so they can keep their power, so Wisconsin taxpayers get to pay for the scene in Wisconsin this past week. Wisconsin isn’t the only state where this is coming to a forefront. This is from Steve Malanga at the Wall Street Journal.
…public-sector unions especially have become the nation’s most aggressive advocates for higher taxes and spending. They sponsor tax-raising ballot initiatives and pay for advertising and lobbying campaigns to pressure politicians into voting for them. And they mount multimillion dollar campaigns to defeat efforts by governors and taxpayer groups to roll back taxes.
Early last year, for example, Oregon‘s unions spearheaded a successful battle to pass ballot measures 66 and 67, which collectively raised business and income taxes in the state by an estimated $727 million annually. Led by $2 million from the Oregon Education Association and $1.8 million from the Service Employees International Union (SEIU), unions contributed an estimated 75% of the nearly $7 million raised to promote the tax increases, according to the National Institute on Money in State Politics.
So you are against the constitutional Right of Free assembly?When they organize—merely as an interest group, quite apart from formal collective bargaining—they have several more immense advantages. By leveraging their numbers and resources, their organizations can become major players in politics.
Agree..I come from a family of teachers and they are one of the most underpaid professions that does so much for the world...unions don't just represent public workers.
they also represent PRIVATE ENTERPRISE.
and you think class size and teacher's pay doesn't tie into the overall class experience for a student....
then i don't know... it does...
less students per classroom, generally, the better the class performs, on average. and teachers pay for a LOT of their own teaching supplies out of pocket, so more money they have, the better experience the students receive.
my sister is a 11 year veteran of the public school system. she teaches 9th and 10th graders chemistry and biology. she's out there on the front lines every day with 14-16 year olds and doesn't even make 40k per year.