what sort of proof we talkin here? i'd like to see it, please. until then we're going with the "you don't accuse people of snitching unless you have definitive proof" rule. that this sort of talk is going on in a bc grower's journal would break jody's heart.
all due respect, beans, but i know the man personally (have since i was a teen), and i find that allegation hard to stomach, especially since he's still rotting in an american jail.
the man ain't no slouch.
while i can't imagine that he would put another grower in jail to save his own ass, my personal judgements on his personality/loyalty aside, he wouldn't have given up the goods without looking out for his own; hypothetically (and this is not to suggest i think him capable of snitching, not even an iota) AT THE VERY LEAST he'd have cut a deal so he'd be serving the rest of his sentence up here. AND, had he given up the goods, i imagine your over-extended corrective system couldn't have gottem him off your hands *fast *enough to come rot in jail on OUR buck once they got what they wanted from him. if that's in fact what they wanted from him, and not to conveniently stifle his vocal politicism (which is what i and most bc cannabis folks believe). if what they wanted was a list of smalltime american growers, they'd've attacked the other local seedbanks the same way they did him. but they didn't, did they?
thank you for the perspective, though. it's hard for me to see all of what he's being put through in there as anything less than punishment for NOT singing for his dinner, and it feels good to have put it into words. (again, if you have proof that shows otherwise.... )
and, no offense, the sort of quota-filling growers the federalis are looking for, generally don't have to buy seeds from seedbanks.
[/rant]
sorry, touchy subject.....