of course losers like you would. You have nothing to stand on when spouting your idiotic positions so you make things up about the other person in order to make yourself look better and then lie about it a few posts later. Men don't do this.
Herman Cain 2012
- Thread starter beardo
- Start date
determined to adhere? This clown was for the bailouts, is all for the Fed, and wants to deny Muslims positions in government. Yea he's all for following the constitution the question is which countries Constitution?He confused the founding documents. People do it all the time.
However, I can forgive that because I believe he is determined to adhere to the Constitution.
And as a bonus, at least he knows what fucking YEAR it is.
UncleBuck
Well-Known Member
i think i will vote for herman cain just to piss off parker. not that it matters, my state will likely be solid blue anyway.
what smells like aspercreme?
Carne Seca
Well-Known Member
hmm... I've been gay for quite a while.. I didn't know it had a smell...
UncleBuck
Well-Known Member
would it be insensitive to suggest smegma?hmm... I've been gay for quite a while.. I didn't know it had a smell...
i kid, i kid.
londonfog
Well-Known Member
make sure you register with the repukes so you can vote in their primary...I just did mine this week past...Obama will get my vote in the general election but for the repuke primary I think I will vote for Pizza...phuck Ron Paul
Johnnyorganic
Well-Known Member
I am assuming you are referring to TARP? I don't recall that Cain was in favor of the bailouts. I would be happy to review any evidence to indicate otherwise.
Yes, he supports a Federal Reserve Bank and has given solid reasons why a nation needs one. He has also said he would not oppose an audit of the Fed.
He has since walked back those comments, and said he would consider a Muslim for a position.
*Kenya.
*The joke answer is in keeping with the foolish question.
Johnnyorganic
Well-Known Member
Any of you on the opposition have any comment on this?
Herman Cain Omitted Twice in GOP Oddsmaking
It is from Newsbusters, but the facts are incontrovertible.
Herman Cain Omitted Twice in GOP Oddsmaking
It is from Newsbusters, but the facts are incontrovertible.
UncleBuck
Well-Known Member
that is interesting, especially since he probably has the best odds of the entire pack of clowns the right has running.
no voting history to hang him by, "real world" experience, and gets high marks on his speeches.
that is not to say i would endorse cain due to some tings he has said, but i think he has the best shot. he's been climbing the polls.
Johnnyorganic
Well-Known Member
You may want to think twice about that.
Seriously.
I know vote-rigging like this goes on all the time with the goal of upending the opposition.
But, if you identify with a party during its primary, you ARE that party.
Which is why I do not vote in the primary of any party.
I'm just saying.
londonfog
Well-Known Member
Yawnnnn...sorry..Pizza..Freedom..and by the way not against the law to vote in another parties primary..I will vote in the repuke primary to make sure they put forth a good candidate ...gotta love this country...Pizza and Freedom
some states you can only vote in your parties primary.
well of course TARP was a bailout. Any idiot knows that. Going to change the meaning of the word to fit your agenda? Go into politics.
solid reasons? like devaluing the dollar? like how we were the closest to being out of debt when we didn't have a central Bank?"
which time did he say he was for an audit or is "not opposed"?This prick didn't want any truths to come out that would hurt his thieving buddies in the Fed. This big government twat flip flops so much he makes Romney look like a piker.
[video=youtube;uiAkeFJXwUk]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uiAkeFJXwUk[/video]
The audit revealed-
"Over $10 trillion was given to the Federal Reserve and member banks and trillions more went to foreign banks. This information was disclosed thanks to the bill introduced by Congressman Ron Paul (R-Texas) which proposed making the Federal Reserve transparent and subject to audits but the final version had been stripped down.
"The foreign banks took advantage of this opportunity to dump their toxic assets on the Fed including Deutsche Bank for $300 billion, Credit Suisse for $290 billion for a total of over $1 trillion."
http://consciouslifenews.com/audit-reveals-fed-bailout-of-foreign-banks-cost-trillions/113655/
only a complete idiot would believe a back a candidate who first says no to muslims than says the opposite is a worthy candidate. Muslim bashing is okay to some. He's a repugnant prick for saying what he said.
your foolish answers reveal your head is up your ass on this one J O. How well did having a two faced prick for president work out the last couple of times?*Kenya.
*The joke answer is in keeping with the foolish question.
Johnnyorganic
Well-Known Member
I did not render a judgment either way. I simply stated that you might want to thing twice about it.
And I do not recall stating it was against the law.
If you stand with the Republicans during their Primary, you become a Republican until the next Primary rolls around.
Which will give your tendency to call them 'Repukes' a whole new meaning.
If you truly support Candidate Cain, fine. Cross Party lines on Primary day.
However, I suspect you truly do not support him and only seek to interfere in Republican Party business.
Either way, I really don't care.
I will not be participating the Primaries. I have not participated in a party Primary since 1992, when I voted in the New York State Republican Primary.
But thanks in part to the antics of a certain tin-foil wearing asshat on this thread; I did just make a big, fat campaign contribution to Candidate Cain.
Johnnyorganic
Well-Known Member
So the fact that you knew it makes you an idiot by your own admission.
Maybe YOU should go into politics.
Mr. Cain said he would not oppose an audit in a radio interview of a third-tier nationally syndicated talk-show host who I do not particularly care for and do not listen to as a rule. However, I made a point of catching the interview. It was about three weeks ago.
Your offering from the Neal Boortz show was great! He made conspiracy-theory losers look like a bunch of idiots (there's that word again).
And thank you for exposing me to Conscious Life News. A media outlet I was heretofore unaware of.
I especially enjoyed the articles on Channeling. Lord Metatron sure knows his shit.
And what was in the article that proves anything we don't already know?
Banks transfer money? Heavens to Betsy!
The Fed already conducts internal audits? That confirms what Mr. Cain said on the Boortz show.
And only a complete idiot would not allow any room at all for a candidate to restate a position, or even change positions once shown the error of the original position.
Then that makes two of us; with key difference. Mine is a very tight fit.
Yours, on the other hand, is like a fucking warehouse. Your head rolls around in your rectal cavity like a marble in an empty shoebox. That's a good thing because there is ample room for your tin-foil hat...
and the gerbil.
londonfog
Well-Known Member
Question if you really don't care...why comment.??? I will vote in the repukes primary to assure they put forth a good candidate..as you see they do have quite a few losers in the race...What I'm doing is allowed...Ron Paul thinks its our right to deny people into a place of business for any reason, so he is a NO GO....by the way if you support Cain why not help him in the primary..I did not render a judgment either way. I simply stated that you might want to thing twice about it.
And I do not recall stating it was against the law.
If you stand with the Republicans during their Primary, you become a Republican until the next Primary rolls around.
Which will give your tendency to call them 'Repukes' a whole new meaning.
If you truly support Candidate Cain, fine. Cross Party lines on Primary day.
However, I suspect you truly do not support him and only seek to interfere in Republican Party business.
Either way, I really don't care.
I will not be participating the Primaries. I have not participated in a party Primary since 1992, when I voted in the New York State Republican Primary.
But thanks in part to the antics of a certain tin-foil wearing asshat on this thread; I did just make a big, fat campaign contribution to Candidate Cain.
Johnnyorganic
Well-Known Member
I am perfectly capable of offering an analysis of the effects of particular actions without having any interest whatsoever whether those actions are taken or not.
If I have an opinion, it is MY prerogative to determine whether or not I share it; not yours.
I already explained why I do not participate in primaries. I do not wish to self-identify as a Republican; an issue with which you apparently have no problem.
I support Cain monetarily, which helps him now. Moreover, I will not have to sully my good name by putting a big, fat 'R' behind it.
Which is more than I can say about your plan.
