Wisconsin Revolt

Who do you support in the Wisconsin Revolt?

  • Total voters
    118
UncleBuck said:
he never said you were a racist, genius. he said he found it interesting that you used the writings of a racist to support your point of view.

methinks thou doth protest too much. if you were truly secure in your non-racism, you wouldn't have shown that hair trigger reaction, indignation, and false accusation that he called you a racist.
Click to expand...

He then went on to say "There seems to be a underlying, prevailing theme in this politics forum that leans toward racist ideology. " So if we all lean towards racists ideology - that means we are racist.

Protests too much? Ok, lets try it with you. Uncle Buck is a child molester. If I walked up and said "You are a child molester" in a room full of people, how would you react? Yea, keep on with your accusations and justifications.
 
Carthoris said:
You are just a whiny bitch who dreams of communism and jerks off to mental images of having a 3some with Obama and Stalin. You are truly screwed in the head. xoxo The only thing lefties haven't said is the pie thing, and that was an analogy.
Click to expand...

mmmm, pie :)

wait, what?
 
Carthoris said:
He then went on to say "There seems to be a underlying, prevailing theme in this politics forum that leans toward racist ideology. " So if we all lean towards racists ideology - that means we are racist.

Protests too much? Ok, lets try it with you. Uncle Buck is a child molester. If I walked up and said "You are a child molester" in a room full of people, how would you react? Yea, keep on with your accusations and justifications.
Click to expand...

i didn't comment on that second part of what he said. i don't really see it the same way though. i've only ever seen a few outwardly racists/supremacists on this board, and maybe a few xenophobes, but that's all.

if you walked up and called me a child molester i might laugh. i wouldn't take a defensive position.

now if you said i fantasized about a gay three way with communists, i might get defensive, if ya catch my drift ;)
 
UncleBuck said:
he never said you were a racist, genius. he said he found it interesting that you used the writings of a racist to support your point of view.

methinks thou doth protest too much. if you were truly secure in your non-racism, you wouldn't have shown that hair trigger reaction, indignation, and false accusation that he called you a racist.
Click to expand...

Thank you for attempting to clarify the situation Uncle Buck, but your mediating is not necessary, nor is your instigating. Carne Seca and I are cool. I didn't realize you were such an effective pyschoanalyst, but I'm afraid I'll have to decline your services since I'm not interested in paying you and would never dream of putting that burden on others for a "service" I do not desire or need.

Although if I were to bother to give you advice I'd suggest working on your debate technique it seems a little heavy on the personal attacks and weak on the logic, consistency and argument buttressing. No need to reimburse me for the advice, consider that a freebie.
 
Carthoris said:
He then went on to say "There seems to be a underlying, prevailing theme in this politics forum that leans toward racist ideology. " So if we all lean towards racists ideology - that means we are racist.
Click to expand...

My point of view hasn't changed. I still feel that there is an agenda here. I jumped the gun on Rob Roy and I apologized publicly and privately.
 
Rob Roy said:
Thank you for attempting to clarify the situation Uncle Buck, but your mediating is not necessary, nor is your instigating. Carne Seca and I are cool. I didn't realize you were such an effective pyschoanalyst, but I'm afraid I'll have to decline your services since I'm not interested in paying you and would never dream of putting that burden on others for a "service" I do not desire or need.

Although if I were to bother to give you advice I'd suggest working on your debate technique it seems a little heavy on the personal attacks and weak on the logic, consistency and argument buttressing. No need to reimburse me for the advice, consider that a freebie.
Click to expand...

i wasn't mediating, i was sincerely trying to make sure you understood written words, as it seems you were not capable. someone simply pointed out that you used the argument of a supremacist and you inferred that he called you racist, which was not the case. way to defend yourself from an attack that never happened though.

since you were so kind to give me a freebie, i feel i should not mooch (like some people want to do) and would do well to return the favor. so to you i would say that your arguments would work a lot better if you used words the actual way they are defined, rather than in whatever way sounds good to you but does not actually use said words in their correct context.
 
UncleBuck said:
i didn't comment on that second part of what he said. i don't really see it the same way though. i've only ever seen a few outwardly racists/supremacists on this board, and maybe a few xenophobes, but that's all.

if you walked up and called me a child molester i might laugh. i wouldn't take a defensive position.

now if you said i fantasized about a gay three way with communists, i might get defensive, if ya catch my drift ;)
Click to expand...

lol, Im not even sure what to say.
 
Carne Seca said:
My point of view hasn't changed. I still feel that there is an agenda here. I jumped the gun on Rob Roy and I apologized publicly and privately.
Click to expand...

What kind of agenda? I don't think any of the things here affect blacks more than whites. Exactly what are you saying is racist?
 
newatit2010 said:
Glad to see the unions have enough to pay off federal judges
Click to expand...
State judge. This ruling merely takes the heat off the Secretary of State who has been dragging his feet publishing the law, which would make it effective. He was supposed to have done it already.

The judge says the passage of the law violated the state's open meeting laws, hence the (temporary) injunction until she makes a ruling; however long that will take. :roll:

Some might call this judicial activism, but I won't.

It will all get sorted out. The law will be enacted and Progressive fucktards will cry like pussies.

Maybe they will march again. That'll show us.
 
You bringing things up that happened decades and decades ago as defense of why we need unions now is pointless. It is like saying how good of a job a fire did at keeping your house warm before when the house is burning down now.
 
Carne Seca said:
It's nice to know that the rule of law is still in effect for Wisconsin.
Click to expand...

Even if they had given 24 hour notice, none of the democrats would of shown up. It is like a kid who quits playing because he doesn't like the score.

"The judge's decision does not prevent lawmakers from giving proper notice and reconvening the joint conference committee meeting in the coming days."

What this means is if it gets thrown out, they will just do it again and it will pass. This is the only option the democrats had to delay the bill, and now it is played out.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top