No problems here sputnik, and I didn't take offense to your views. It's just that when you suggested that the revolt only happened because of western plots, i felt I had to disagree. I have been following these events closely, and have seen how one thing led to the next, and it seemed, to me at least, that they have happened in an organic manner, rather than any kind of pre-conceived plot.
I will also note that gadaffi wasn't an enemy of western countries in recent years, and much of what he has in terms of weaponry was supplied by the US and europe, in exchange for cooperation regarding oil trade. He was a "friendly dictator", and it wouldn't be in the interests of the west to organise a revolt in this manner. I do however share your opinion that whoever replaces him is likely to be a corporate pawn, since I doubt the western elites will just sit back and let events unfold without interference, although from what I have been seeing the Libyans are well aware of this fact, and for many of them the revolt is as much about freeing themselves from western imperialism as it is about freeing themselves from dictatorial rule.
I disagree with your statement that libyans don't have the capacity to govern themselves, and have any kind of problem with "modern communication technologies". From what I have observed, they can use social media platforms very effectively, as a tool for organisation and change, moreso than most of us in the west are able or motivated to do. As for self-governence, they have been doing it for years, with people's committees etc. It's just that now, they may actually be able to achieve changes, without fear of death or arrest if they rock the boat.
Regarding what you saw on TV, it is probably unwise for you to infer anything from a single clip on TV regarding an event as complex as this. As for the actual content you referred to, does the fact that many signs were written with the same pen mean anything? I would suggest that maybe one person in the group pictured was writing all the signs whilst others were doing other things. The fact that it was a small group, or that some of them were covering their faces or wearing shades doesn't seem significant either, when you bear in mind that people are being massacred for protesting. Also, where was this video that you saw actually shot? Somewhere densely populated, or in a small town or village?
I would be more convinced of your theory if you had observed something like multiple protests in entirely seperate locations, but with the same faces appearing in many of them (as happened with the media coverage of the "liberation" of Baghdad).