On the Impeachment Front ... Help Needed

WillieNelson

Well-Known Member
I didn't say they weren't crooks, but when Clinton gized on a dress we all knew about. The stain was confirmable, credible. Newspapers won't run information that is wrong or false. And before you give me the "media is rigged" bullshit speach, the BBC more nuertral than US news and even they don't buy this crap.

When we post links you just ignore them or say they're just bullshit.

Thats because they are. If the Times or the Post ran any of this crap , I would belive you. If the sites you gave me didn't have links to impeachment nonsense, I would belive you. Unbiased means nuetral. None of links are close to neutral. I don't think we should be in Iraq. I think that we are there for many horrible reasons. I also think we are wasting time trying to call for impeachment without a smoking gun. I might be a capitalist, but I am not a war monger.
 

ccodiane

New Member
I know ... but the point is to make some noise ... let them know we know they are both and pay for ... that's the point.
Maybe if we all bang pots and pans together, say, around, 10 am Eastern time on a certain day next week, they might finally realize we are serious and then they'll listen. It's worth a shot guys! Just pick a day and then we'll all tell 10, er, 4?, friends to join in. You do have 4 friends don't you?
 

ccodiane

New Member
According to you, there are none. When we post links you just ignore them or say they're just bullshit. Me thinks you are a joker. Pull that head out and open your eyes. Them boys in DC are crooks.
The problem with lib sources is numbskulls like these two can write an article, and other libs will sight it as a source. If anyone calls them on it, they will just throw ten more sources at you, without even taking up the argument that their last source was a confirmed blithering idiot. "Lets just move on."
 

GrowRebel

Well-Known Member
you actually believe that anyone that commits a crime will be indicted Huhhh? Jails???? What an idiot!!!
I better clarify for the small bushies mentality ... everyone that commits a crime is NOT indicted ... if that were true all the members of the illegitimate bush regime would be in jail back in 2000 ... there are plenty of War criminals still running around free ... what a dumbass ... :neutral:
 

GrowRebel

Well-Known Member
Maybe if we all bang pots and pans together, say, around, 10 am Eastern time on a certain day next week, they might finally realize we are serious and then they'll listen. It's worth a shot guys! Just pick a day and then we'll all tell 10, er, 4?, friends to join in. You do have 4 friends don't you?
How bout you bang your hollow head ... that will make an echo sound as well ... :-|
 

ccodiane

New Member
I better clarify for the small bushies mentality ... everyone that commits a crime is NOT indicted ... if that were true all the members of the illegitimate bush regime would be in jail back in 2000 ... there are plenty of War criminals still running around free ... what a dumbass ... :neutral:
Thanks gul rebal. I hope you straightened that out for yourself.
 

GrowRebel

Well-Known Member
I didn't say they weren't crooks, but when Clinton gized on a dress we all knew about. The stain was confirmable, credible. Newspapers won't run information that is wrong or false.
Man you are so out of touch with reality ... Newspapers run information that is wrong and false all the time ... like the WMD lie ... when they KNEW it was false ... NYT did an article saying they were sorry about the lie (ie withholding news that countered claim of WMD), then turned around and started lying again ...


And before you give me the "media is rigged" bullshit speach, the BBC more nuertral than US news and even they don't buy this crap.
Oh they don't?
McGovern urges Bush's impeachment

Should George Bush be impeached over Iraq?

... and let's not forget this wonderful piece by BBC ...
BBC Documentary ... Bush STOLE 2004 Election

Thats because they are. If the Times or the Post ran any of this crap , I would belive you.

No you won't ...
NYT:Push for Impeachment


NYT on Impeachment

So start making up an excuse for not believing ... bushies think they are really good at it ... :roll:



I also think we are wasting time trying to call for impeachment without a smoking gun. I might be a capitalist, but I am not a war monger.
Holding public officials accountable for war crimes is NEVER a waste of time ... only for those that support war criminals ... :-|



:neutral:
 

GrowRebel

Well-Known Member
Yeah ... it is pretty typical of us liberals to slam you with the FACTS ... we are good at that ... too bad you aren't ...
 

ccodiane

New Member
Then what's the standard retort of liberal women, if thats what you mean by don't have one. "My vagina is smaller than your vagina!"??? Please, I'm curious!!!:mrgreen::mrgreen::mrgreen:
 

Wavels

Well-Known Member

Hey GR did you even bother to read this specious nonsense that you pasted as some type of effort by the NYT to print THEIR OWN reasons as to why Bush should be impeached?

The first link is to a story about San Francisco city supervisors passing a pro impeachment resolution…hahaha

And the second link is about Vermont Senators doing the same thing…even more laughable…hahaha!

If the NYT could possibly come up with any quasi objective rationale for impeachment based upon any real evidence they most certainly would have done so!!
Yikes!
 
Top