vertise
Well-Known Member
So your opinion of someones need for MMJ should mean more than a doctors?
(What does this even mean. You are saying that someones need for medical marijuana should mean more then a doctors need for mmj)
What kind of jobs are you refering to? Your words are vague, trying to evoke sympathy for some non-existant people you just made up...and how the heck are the white collar types more affected than blue?
(Any and all company's can legaly deny ANY marijuana user a job. Medicinal or not. However, under prop 19, in order to deny a marijuana user employment the employer must accurately prove his/her use of weed will affect performance. Which tech cannot be done until that person performs such job. )
This makes absolutely no sense, and you probably cant establish this with any credibility. And yes, this is ALL ABOUT THE WEED. If it wasn't why are you here?
(Not all about weed, i do not know if you are responding to something i said on another thread. The voters that make up most of the yes' are most likely none growers. The bill is the perfect compromise for growers/smoker/none marijuana users. Try thinking of a bill that would be supported by all different mindsets. Not just yours.)
(What does this even mean. You are saying that someones need for medical marijuana should mean more then a doctors need for mmj)
What kind of jobs are you refering to? Your words are vague, trying to evoke sympathy for some non-existant people you just made up...and how the heck are the white collar types more affected than blue?
(Any and all company's can legaly deny ANY marijuana user a job. Medicinal or not. However, under prop 19, in order to deny a marijuana user employment the employer must accurately prove his/her use of weed will affect performance. Which tech cannot be done until that person performs such job. )
This makes absolutely no sense, and you probably cant establish this with any credibility. And yes, this is ALL ABOUT THE WEED. If it wasn't why are you here?
(Not all about weed, i do not know if you are responding to something i said on another thread. The voters that make up most of the yes' are most likely none growers. The bill is the perfect compromise for growers/smoker/none marijuana users. Try thinking of a bill that would be supported by all different mindsets. Not just yours.)