One More Reason To Hate Ron Paul

hanimmal

Well-Known Member
Toss in gay rights and lose conspiracy theories about the Fed and I would vote for him too. I don't mind small government folks, but why fight the one agency that actually makes us billions every year?
 

blazin256

Well-Known Member
Toss in gay rights and lose conspiracy theories about the Fed and I would vote for him too. I don't mind small government folks, but why fight the one agency that actually makes us billions every year?
meanwhile, we're TRILLIONS in the hole...
 

Parker

Well-Known Member
There are some things I like about ron paul and some things I don't, but his cult like following and the fact that he's so much of an ideologue do bother me. Ironically, those are the things those very people think of obama and his supporters. It's all a matter of perspective, I suppose.
The problem is not him or his supporters. The problem is people like you think the Constitution can be played with. The rules don't matter.
 

hanimmal

Well-Known Member
meanwhile, we're TRILLIONS in the hole...
They make us billions all the while siphoning off trillions behind your back.
Here we go again, did I just waste my time figuring out how much all these trillions in debt actually cost us? There really is nothing disputing the importance of central banks and the wealth of nations.

The whole idea that somehow I am more poor because I decided to get a house is backwards logic. I may pay out a lot and be in a deficit (loan counts against the wealth I have as paid for) but in reality (if you like having your own home) I am living far better than I would have if I had not bought the house and decided to stick it out in an apartment for the 20 years it would take to put enough aside and buy it outright.
 

NoDrama

Well-Known Member
There really is nothing disputing the importance of central banks and the wealth of nations.
What was the Wealthiest nation in 1912? Did that nation have a Central bank?

Answers: USA. NO.

Point: You don't need a central bank to be the Wealthiest nation that ever existed.
 

MexicanWarlord420

Active Member
so whites gather and they're called a hate group. meanwhile, a black group gathers, and they're standing up for their rights. makes sense. what EXACTLY do you know about the kkk? ill tell you what you know. you only know what you're told. you only know history as it was written, not how it happened.

excerpt of the 1911 encyclopedia article of the kkk:

"The various causes assigned for the origin and development of this movement were: the absence of stable government in the South for several years after the Civil War; the corrupt and tyrannical rule of the alien, renegade and negro, and the belief that it was supported by the Federal troops which controlled elections and legislative bodies; the disfranchisement of whites; the spread of ideas of social and political equality among the negroes; fear of negro insurrections; the arming of negro militia and the disarming of the whites; outrages upon white women by black men; the influence of Northern adventurers in the Freedmen's Bureau and the Union League in alienating the races; the humiliation of Confederate soldiers after they had been paroled - in general, the insecurity felt by Southern whites during the decade after the collapse of the Confederacy."
http://www.1911encyclopedia.org/Ku_Klux_Klan

if this is the roots of the group why does everyone think they were "lawless" and only out to lynch them some black folks? if you were a slave and tomorrow you didn't have to slave anymore, what would you do? couldn't just go to the unemployment office. was it the kkk that was lawless? or the other way around?
believe what you want. but ill be damned if i ever let being proud to be white be equated to being a hate group. sure you got your more extreme "sects" but that rings true with every single established group that exists now and has existed. that doesn't mean we should view the extremist side as the total history of the whole group.



its called a metaphor. doesn't have to equate to anything.
Yo man are you like in the KKK or just a sympathizer?
 

blazin256

Well-Known Member
no im in the group that tries to wade through all the propaganda spoon fed crap and looks for the real truth. the reason the kkk existed wasn't to lynch any and all colored folk. just as much as the reason for the civil war wasn't to free the slaves.
lets ask encyclopedia freakin britannica if that was a biased article.
 

abe23

Active Member
Uh huh, same with all the propaganda about the nazis. Really, they were just trying to defend the german people from jews and bolshevism...:roll:
 

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member
i must have missed that edition of encyclopedia britannica.
scroll down to the bottom of the page of the neo-nazis you are defending, check out what book they suggest. trusting your laziness, i also c&p'ed it right here for you...

http://www.americannaziparty.com/about/index.php

Each of us must decide just how far we will let the situation in America deteriorate, before we decide to take action to correct it. If you have had enough, and are willing to join the ranks of your ancestors who forged this land from a wilderness teeming with savages, and to keep it from returning to that state, we urge you to become involved. For your children's sake, if not for your own. For White WORKER Power!

Rocky J. Suhayda - Chairman, American Nazi Party
[email protected]

Download Adolf Hitler's masterpiece Mein Kampf HERE.

do you see now why i, as a jew, would have slight problem (to use massive understatement) with ron paul not refusing to accept funding from these racist anti-semites and saying that they too deserve a voice?
 

StonedBlownSkiller

Well-Known Member
Im not defending anybody but Ron Paul not being a jew might be why he doesnt feel the threat or the offense that a jew would. Im not racist or prejudice but I do believe that people of all comings should have just as much voice as anybody else. Everybody has the choice to listen and adknowledge or not. Politicians need money coming from somewhere and Im certain there are some getting it from worse people than an organized white party. I also dont believe they are just teaching hate. They are saying whites should also be proud and honor their heritage. We have to honor everybody elses ways in America. Why should our own be forgotten?
 

budsmoker87

New Member
i have a bigger problem with the gov't coming up with this "too big to fail" bullshit lie and robbing the country to give to corporations (fascism) under the threat that "if we don't steal your money to give it to AIG, fannie and freddie, goldman sachs, meryl lynch, etc. then the whole financial system will collapse"


i really can't see why your upset about something so trivial
 

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member
Im not defending anybody...
yes you are. you do so in the next sentence. FAIL

but Ron Paul not being a jew might be why he doesnt feel the threat or the offense that a jew would.
I do believe that people of all comings should have just as much voice as anybody else.
even people who want you to read mein kampf and support neo-nazism?

Politicians need money coming from somewhere and Im certain there are some getting it from worse people
than we should find out who is taking money from worse people and condemn them for it as well. that is no excuse to look the other way when other politician like ron paul take money from the american nazi party or its supporters who are holocaust deniers

...than an organized white party...
nice euphemism for nazis, goebbels.

I also dont believe they are just teaching hate.
your beliefs are laughable then. read their website.

They are saying whites should also be proud and honor their heritage...Why should our own be forgotten?
go ahead and be proud. honor your heritage. don't be forgotten.

but don't preach white power and deny the holocaust.

that was a hefty sack of FAIL there.
 

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member
i really can't see why your upset about something so trivial
i would not describe an influential politician with hordes of followers stating that neo-nazis who advocate reading mein kampf deserve a voice as 'so trivial'.

would you call the holocaust trivial?

because that all originated with an influential politician with hordes of followers who gave nazis a voice and advocated the reading of mein kampf.

i guess i am just being silly...trying to learn the lessons of history.
 

budsmoker87

New Member
everybody deserves a voice...if you censorship certain people/views, then guess what...you don't have a free society


it's that simple
 

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member
everybody deserves a voice...if you censorship certain people/views, then guess what...you don't have a free society


it's that simple
simple is as simple does.

they have a voice.

they don't lose their voice if a politician refuses to accept their racist, holocaust denying, mein kampf reading money.

is that simple enough for you to understand?
 

budsmoker87

New Member
was responding to THIS question fool...


i would not describe an influential politician with hordes of followers stating that neo-nazis who advocate reading mein kampf deserve a voice as 'so trivial'.

would you call the holocaust trivial?
 
Top