Should rollitup.org replace 'Marijuana' with 'Cannabis'?

engineeredweed

Well-Known Member
Ok I personally think that they should as

'Marijuana' is a dirty word that has been

used to vilify cannabis for many decades.

What do you people think about the issue?

I think we should also have a sitewide vote.


:weed:
 

First Time Growin

Active Member
Yes! marijuana is a bad word, change it

MARIJUANA is DANGEROUS. Pot is NOT harmful
to the human body or mind. Marijuana does NOT pose a threat to the general public. Marijuana is very much a danger to the oil companies, alcohol, tobacco industries and a large number of chemical corporations. Various big businesses, with plenty of dollars and influence, have suppressed the truth from the people.

The truth is if marijuana was utilized for its vast array of commercial products, it would create an industrial atomic bomb! Entrepreneurs have not been educated on the product potential of pot. The super rich have conspired to spread misinformation about an extremely versatile plant that, if used properly, would ruin their companies.
Where did the word 'marijuana' come from? In the mid 1930s, the M-word was created to tarnish the good image and phenomenal history of the hemp plant...as you will read. The facts cited here, with references, are generally verifiable in the Encyclopedia Britannica which was printed on hemp paper for 150 years:
* All schoolbooks were made from hemp or flax paper until the 1880s; Hemp Paper Reconsidered, Jack Frazier, 1974.
* It was LEGAL TO PAY TAXES WITH HEMP in America from 1631 until the early 1800s; LA Times, Aug. 12, 1981.
* REFUSING TO GROW HEMP in America during the 17th and 18th Centuries WAS AGAINST THE LAW! You could be jailed in Virginia for refusing to grow hemp from 1763 to 1769; Hemp in Colonial Virginia, G. M. Herdon.


http://www.illuminati-news.com/marijuana-conspiracy.htm for more awesome facts being cited with references and even the conspiracy behind marihuana first being thrown into American consciousness to slander the good word of hemp
 

engineeredweed

Well-Known Member
I'll cosponsor this suggestion. I try not to refer to bud as marijuana for all those reasons already.

It's Cannabis: the miracle plant.
Yeah I agree, the word marijuana carrys too

many negative connotations with it. It infact

suprises me that this site uses the word

even in the browser bar. Some words carry

negative energy and this is one of them.
 

Woodstock.Hippie

New Member
[youtube]K9WorIM0RhA[/youtube][youtube]YFIh8PGUOCQ[/youtube]

Witnessing a ganjajillion ginormous piles of legal marijuana is a special kind of in-your-face language that marijuana haters really understand at a very deep, spiritual level.

:hump:
:peace:
 

Dirty Harry

Well-Known Member
This is who evers site and he/she can choose to call it what ever he/she wants...But in talking to people about this, I do use the word cannabis instead of marijuana. When some people here the word marijuana, I can see them recoil as they only know what reefer madness told them. Call it cannabis, they are not used to that word (or never heard of if) and are more open to discussion.

IMHO of course.
 

engineeredweed

Well-Known Member
Good point dirty harry and a I like your thinking! Surely whoever runs this site wouldnt approve of the negative connotations that come with the word marijuana? Besides why not use the proper name?
 

gogrow

confused
at least it presents a valid argument.....

THE CONSPIRACY


Andrew Mellon became Hoover's Secretary of the Treasury and Dupont's primary investor. He appointed his future nephew-in-law, Harry J. Anslinger, to head the Federal Bureau of Narcotics and Dangerous Drugs.

Secret meetings were held by these financial tycoons. Hemp was declared dangerous and a threat to their billion dollar enterprises. For their dynasties to remain intact, hemp had to go. These men took an obscure Mexican slang word: 'marihuana' and pushed it into the consciousness of America.


MEDIA MANIPULATION


A media blitz of 'yellow journalism' raged in the late 1920s and 1930s. Hearst's newspapers ran stories emphasizing the horrors of marihuana. The menace of marihuana made headlines. Readers learned that it was responsible for everything from car accidents to loose morality.

Films like 'Reefer Madness' (1936), 'Marihuana: Assassin of Youth' (1935) and 'Marihuana: The Devil's Weed' (1936) were propaganda designed by these industrialists to create an enemy. Their purpose was to gain public support so that anti-marihuana laws could be passed.

Examine the following quotes from 'The Burning Question' aka REEFER MADNESS:


  • a violent narcotic.
  • acts of shocking violence.
  • incurable insanity.
  • soul-destroying effects.
  • under the influence of the drug he killed his entire family with an ax.
  • more vicious, more deadly even than these soul-destroying drugs (heroin, cocaine) is the menace of marihuana!
Reefer Madness did not end with the usual 'the end.' The film concluded with these words plastered on the screen: TELL YOUR CHILDREN.

In the 1930s, people were very naive; even to the point of ignorance. The masses were like sheep waiting to be led by the few in power. They did not challenge authority. If the news was in print or on the radio, they believed it had to be true. They told their children and their children grew up to be the parents of the baby-boomers.

On April 14, 1937, the Prohibitive Marihuana Tax Law or the bill that outlawed hemp was directly brought to the House Ways and Means Committee. This committee is the only one that can introduce a bill to the House floor without it being debated by other committees. The Chairman of the Ways and Means, Robert Doughton, was a Dupont supporter. He insured that the bill would pass Congress.

Dr. James Woodward, a physician and attorney, testified too late on behalf of the American Medical Association. He told the committee that the reason the AMA had not denounced the Marihuana Tax Law sooner was that the Association had just discovered that marihuana was hemp.

Few people, at the time, realized that the deadly menace they had been reading about on Hearst's front pages was in fact passive hemp. The AMA understood cannabis to be a MEDICINE found in numerous healing products sold over the last hundred years.

In September of 1937, hemp became illegal. The most useful crop known became a drug and our planet has been suffering ever since.

Congress banned hemp because it was said to be the most violence-causing drug known. Anslinger, head of the Drug Commission for 31 years, promoted the idea that marihuana made users act extremely violent. In the 1950s, under the Communist threat of McCarthyism, Anslinger now said the exact opposite. Marijuana will pacify you so much that soldiers would not want to fight.

Today, our planet is in desperate trouble. Earth is suffocating as large tracts of rain forests disappear. Pollution, poisons and chemicals are killing people. These great problems could be reversed if we industrialized hemp. Natural biomass could provide all of the planet's energy needs that are currently supplied by fossil fuels. We have consumed 80% of our oil and gas reserves. We need a renewable resource. Hemp could be the solution to soaring gas prices.
 

HoLE

Well-Known Member
Ok I personally think that they should as

'Marijuana' is a dirty word that has been

used to vilify cannabis for many decades.

What do you people think about the issue?

I think we should also have a sitewide vote.

:weed:
ok,,,replace marijuana with cannabis,,,,so your going to take away the pot,,,and put back the pot,,,
call it what ya want,,I'm smokin some:hump:
 
Top