natrone23
Well-Known Member
I agree whether we like it or not Al Qaeda is at WAR with the United States. They must be hunted down wherever they are. Either goverments turn them over or we will come and make a visit ourselves.
where do you growers here stand politically? conservative or a liberals?
- Thread starter \m/ \m/
- Start date
I agree whether we like it or not Al Qaeda is at WAR with the United States. They must be hunted down wherever they are. Either goverments turn them over or we will come and make a visit ourselves.
CrackerJax
New Member
That's exactly right Nat. It takes both sides agreeing on a peace, not one.
We must crush them till they cry Uncle. Or Allah, ... or whatever. But we want lots of crying....
We must crush them till they cry Uncle. Or Allah, ... or whatever. But we want lots of crying....
Mr.GreenJeans
Well-Known Member
Hmmm.....So you think that whether or not someone grows/smokes weed affects their political ideology?????? What planet are you from? Or have you just lived a very sheltered life? Do you REALLY think ONLY liberals smoke weed????? Now THAT is ignorant!!!!!!
LOTS of so-called "conservatives" smoke weed dude!!! Just because someone smokes it doesn't mean they are a liberal moron out of touch with the reality of the world around them (like those hippy scumbags I grew up around in the 60's --- the media has massively romanticized the whole 60's thing. I was there, and the true "hippies" were usually [not always, of course] the lowest, dirtiest form of scum in society. Unfortunately, now they are in political power and virtually run the mainstream media!).
That's like thinking that if someone dresses professionally and works in the corporate world 60+ hours a week and is successsful they don't smoke. LOTS of upper management corporate-types smoke weed for stress reduction --- plus they just like getting high like everyone else!!. They're just not lazy-ass long-haired college kids with no solid direction or ambition in life (although most of us WERE at one point in our lives, but then we grew up!!!!!).
There is absolutely nothing hypocritical about ANYONE smoking or growing pot unless they are a cop, a judge, or a DEA agent (And trust me, LOTS of them smoke pot too!!!!).
No intent to flame here, I just don't understand your statement/position/point of view on this.
I guess your last sentence there pretty well summed it up --- "I guess some people are just ignorant". And before you go getting all pissed off be sure you undertstand the definition of ignorance -- it has nothing to do with intelligence or common sense and to point out someones ignorance is not in any way insulting. We are ALL ignorant about some issues -- that's just the way of the world.
Just $.02 worth from a conservative, Limbaugh listening (occassionally -- I really prefer Neal Boortz)), ultra pro-military, "Republican" square asshole who grows really good weed and has smoked more pot than any dozen little college-age punks ever will combined (lol)!!!
GOOD thread though, dude!!!+rep!!
It's pretty interesting to see the warped perceptions and fucked-up stereotypes that a lot of the people here have. And I thought it was the Liberals that were supposed to be open-minded!! Very interesting read from a psychological viewpoint, indeed!!
Mr.GreenJeans
Well-Known Member
Do you remember the beloved Clinton administration? They had absolutely NO problem with using government/military force against innocent U.S. Citizens within our country who were deemed "subversive" (Ruby Ridge and the Branch Davidians at Waco, TX are 2 of the most obvious examples, but definitely not the only ones!).
The "war" (which by definition it is not, because you cannot have a declaration of war against an ideology) against those who would use terrorism as a tool against us knows NO boundaries or national borders, nor should it!!! Hunt them down and exterminate them and all who support and harbor them wherever they may be, whether it is in the middle-east, Europe, Asia, or within our own borders. If other nations have an issue with that then all they need to do is get the bastards themselves and turn them over to us. Otherwise they are knowingly assisting the terrorists and should be treated as terrorists themselves!!
Kill 'em all, let Allah sort 'em out!!!!!
CrackerJax
New Member
Here's a taste of Islam for all you sympathizers of it. Be very glad your daughter isn't living in a Islamic nation.
=================================================================
The Sickness of Islam: Virgins Must be Raped Before Execution
July 20, 2009, 9:09 pm — Angus Dei But, of course, you can’t have sex without being married, so you have to marry them, rape them, and then you can execute them. The girls – we’re talking about teenagers here – might resist though, so you might have to drug them too.
“He said he had been a highly regarded member of the force, and had so “impressed my superiors” that, at 18, “I was given the ‘honor’ to temporarily marry young girls before they were sentenced to death.”
In the Islamic Republic it is illegal to execute a young woman, regardless of her crime, if she is a virgin, he explained. Therefore a “wedding” ceremony is conducted the night before the execution: The young girl is forced to have sexual intercourse with a prison guard – essentially raped by her “husband.”
“I regret that, even though the marriages were legal,” he said.
Why the regret, if the marriages were “legal?”
“Because,” he went on, “I could tell that the girls were more afraid of their ‘wedding’ night than of the execution that awaited them in the morning. And they would always fight back, so we would have to put sleeping pills in their food. By morning the girls would have an empty expression; it seemed like they were ready or wanted to die.”
I will not be satisfied until Islam is utterly destroyed and removed from the face of the earth forever. It is an intrinsically evil religion.
============================================================================================================
That craziness aside.... they are executing teenage girls over there for practically anything.
Barbaric.....
=================================================================
The Sickness of Islam: Virgins Must be Raped Before Execution
July 20, 2009, 9:09 pm — Angus Dei But, of course, you can’t have sex without being married, so you have to marry them, rape them, and then you can execute them. The girls – we’re talking about teenagers here – might resist though, so you might have to drug them too.
“He said he had been a highly regarded member of the force, and had so “impressed my superiors” that, at 18, “I was given the ‘honor’ to temporarily marry young girls before they were sentenced to death.”
In the Islamic Republic it is illegal to execute a young woman, regardless of her crime, if she is a virgin, he explained. Therefore a “wedding” ceremony is conducted the night before the execution: The young girl is forced to have sexual intercourse with a prison guard – essentially raped by her “husband.”
“I regret that, even though the marriages were legal,” he said.
Why the regret, if the marriages were “legal?”
“Because,” he went on, “I could tell that the girls were more afraid of their ‘wedding’ night than of the execution that awaited them in the morning. And they would always fight back, so we would have to put sleeping pills in their food. By morning the girls would have an empty expression; it seemed like they were ready or wanted to die.”
I will not be satisfied until Islam is utterly destroyed and removed from the face of the earth forever. It is an intrinsically evil religion.
============================================================================================================
That craziness aside.... they are executing teenage girls over there for practically anything.
Barbaric.....
Mr.GreenJeans
Well-Known Member
Nothing some well-placed tactical nukes won't take care of!!!!!!!!!!!!
CrackerJax
New Member
The problem is ... I can't see Obama having the balls for that.
Now if Al Queda gets a tactical nuke ... I think you can guess whose balls are bigger.
The stakes are that high...... some don't see it.
Now if Al Queda gets a tactical nuke ... I think you can guess whose balls are bigger.
The stakes are that high...... some don't see it.
Mr.GreenJeans
Well-Known Member
Then they are not only idiots, they are completely blind!!!! The Islamofascists want nothing but the total eradication of the Western world and will do all they can with the means available to them. Too many Americans seem to think that the rest of the world operates by Judeo-Christian principles/ethics. They couldn't be more wrong.
CrackerJax
New Member
In the end, liberals think everyone will return a kindness ... they won't. No country provides more aid outside its borders than the USA, but it is rarely appreciated, and then only by friendly nations. Unfriendly nations simply take advantage of it.
Mr.GreenJeans
Well-Known Member
Kindness = Weakness in the eyes of many, if not most, of the worlds cultures.
But hard-core leftists liberals just don't seem to understand that.
But hard-core leftists liberals just don't seem to understand that.
Murfy
Well-Known Member
i think mohammed was Satan he started islam to spite and destroy the teachings of Christ
he picked the the yo-yo's out of the group to present it to-and it took
knowing that one day it would lead to global war and the Armageddon
their entire religion is a mess it teaches violence and non tolerance at every turn-who else does this-satanists?
cj is right these people are READY!
i'm ok though every one knows"a country boy can survive"
he picked the the yo-yo's out of the group to present it to-and it took
knowing that one day it would lead to global war and the Armageddon
their entire religion is a mess it teaches violence and non tolerance at every turn-who else does this-satanists?
cj is right these people are READY!
i'm ok though every one knows"a country boy can survive"
CrackerJax
New Member
Weakness begets violence ... every time.
The modern day liberal is the global definition of weakness.
Carter=weak
Reagan=strong
Clinton = weak
Bush=strong
Obama=weak
Next Pres=???
Notice a pattern? After a period of USA weakness, someone needs to step up and fight the battles built up from the preceding weak President.
It's not that the Republican Presidents are war mongers, they aren't.
It's because our opponents have become emboldened enough from the previous President to represent a threat to our security.
Obama will bring us violence..... if he's not careful.
The modern day liberal is the global definition of weakness.
Carter=weak
Reagan=strong
Clinton = weak
Bush=strong
Obama=weak
Next Pres=???
Notice a pattern? After a period of USA weakness, someone needs to step up and fight the battles built up from the preceding weak President.
It's not that the Republican Presidents are war mongers, they aren't.
It's because our opponents have become emboldened enough from the previous President to represent a threat to our security.
Obama will bring us violence..... if he's not careful.
CrackerJax
New Member
It would have been redundant ... my point is clear enough. My point is quite valid and true as well.
Obama may surprise me, but so far .... no. He is falling into foreign policy sand traps everywhere. Anyone heard from Hillary lately? Or has she fallen into a black hole? Dang, I bet she knows now how bad she is messed up politically. She never should have taken that post. It's ruining her credibility.
Obama may surprise me, but so far .... no. He is falling into foreign policy sand traps everywhere. Anyone heard from Hillary lately? Or has she fallen into a black hole? Dang, I bet she knows now how bad she is messed up politically. She never should have taken that post. It's ruining her credibility.
CrackerJax
New Member
My criteria is that after an entire year, Hillary has not one success, and has been embarrassed and or laughed at by major nation players. It's been one roll back of expectations after another. In one year, the foreign policy lay in shambles..... that's my criteria.
No one wants to be linked to a failed administration. No one wants to be linked to a President who comes in with such one sided power and BLOWS it.
Failure is an orphan in politics, and if Hillary was a bit smarter, she would have left the stage entirely. She will sink with the administration. She knows it now. And it is sinking.
No one wants to be linked to a failed administration. No one wants to be linked to a President who comes in with such one sided power and BLOWS it.
Failure is an orphan in politics, and if Hillary was a bit smarter, she would have left the stage entirely. She will sink with the administration. She knows it now. And it is sinking.
hanimmal
Well-Known Member
So I ask:
And you come back with:
Well hell, I feel bad for Carter for having a weak Hillary, and poor old Bill for having to be married to a weak person.
Seriously do you stop to read what your writing sometimes? Or is it really you are just bored and decide to try to pick a argument?
