CrackerJax
New Member
Like I said... no reading comprehension ...
He IS KENYAN PROOF INCLUDED
- Thread starter TreesOfLife
- Start date
CrackerJax
New Member
show hom3's post... cmon show it
JustAnotherFriedDay
Well-Known Member
Wow. This ones good.
I know you were talking to cracker. But don't say things like LOL@You. It's pointless.
Education doesn't equal experience. Do you know what education is?
Education is book smarts, left brain. Experience is street smarts, right brain. That's what I'm talking about, and I'm not going to call you a fucktard like you did me, because name calling is a clear signal of low self-esteem, which is simply negative emotional energy. I really feel the emotion coming from you using the word fucktard.
Lastly, I sit here and post all day? Look at my post count. Look at my join date. Now look at yours.
I had 60 posts (which were all in toke n talk) before I returned to this forum to get high and discuss some politics. Look how many I have now.
Stop making yourself look like a fool.
Edit: Brain fart on my part, thought you were talking about me. Yah, Cracker does post a lot. Point still remains.
IAm5toned
Well-Known Member
ok then, do what i did, take the pic from the origianal post, and zoom in on it yourself... you dont even have to zoom in, you can see it with the naked eye!That only works if your sitting at my living room table with the proposed original. The pictures you post could be photo-shopped.
ChChoda
Well-Known Member
But the original post you posted is still a posted picture of a picture of the original paper posted on the web.
ChChoda
Well-Known Member
I'd love to read his thesis, if he even had to do one.He can base all he wants(I think he might).
He'll lose everyone else.... he's losing the middle as we type this. How's a long drawn out ordeal with him keeping Cheshire going to get him votes.
No, it's all or nothing, he knows that much. If his true BC comes out OR his true college admissions... he's cooked..
CrackerJax
New Member
Yes, but that's CLASSIFIED!! Imagine that.. a college thesis classified.. oops, wait.... no one can find it.
doobnVA
Well-Known Member
Here is the original statement by hom36grown, and redivider's quote of home36grown's statement (which you falsely attributed to redivider himself)
doobnVA
Well-Known Member
Sorry about the fucktard thing. I barely meant it at all.
Talking to CrackerJax IS pointless, which is why I have essentially given up debating anything with him and choose instead to LOL@Him.
Experience, when talking about reading comprehension, is experience reading and comprehending. Education is book smarts, right? And you READ books, right? Do you see where I'm gong with this?
it irritates me to no end when someone who has NO IDEA what they're talking about most of the time attacks MY comprehension ability. In CJ's case, it's projection, I know.
JustAnotherFriedDay
Well-Known Member
Too much effort involved in an uncontrollable two man argument is now resulting in you just bashing each other.
You guys must both be really bored. You go to such great lengths to discredit each other sometimes.
You guys must both be really bored. You go to such great lengths to discredit each other sometimes.
doobnVA
Well-Known Member
just trying to point out to CJ that my "lack of reading comprehension" is actually HIS OWN that's he's trying to project onto me. I think I've illustrated my point quite clearly. Of course, he'll skim over my posts and continue to insist that he's always right.
CrackerJax
New Member
Again, ur just digging urself deeper. If u read carefully and s-l-o-w-l-y... U will see that all of my points were not directed at the bold type.
holey Moley, ur slow.
holey Moley, ur slow.
JustAnotherFriedDay
Well-Known Member
I hope you didn't even barely mean it. If you really did it all it is is an attempt to diminish me in some way, which has no effect whatsoever, because opinions others have of me are of no matter to me.
You and CJ share the same opinion, that debating with each other is pointless. If so, then stop. But I believe it does have a point, it provides entertainment for you both.
Book smarts doesn't necessarily mean reading. It's organized information by the left brain. By experience I wasn't referring to reading comprehension, although it seems you were. Yes, experience with reading will allow you to comprehend better.
I was referring to experience as street smarts and flexibility.
Lacking education means you are too confused and scattered about the topic (what you would consider CJ to be with politics)
Lacking experience means you are too narrow and inflexible with the topic.
(what I consider you to be with politics)
Again, its all opinions, but if you can't integrate others ideas into your own, you really are selling yourself short.
CrackerJax
New Member
Street smarts = common sense.
Lib's are in short supply, hence the need for an intervention by strangers (govt.) to help them out.
Lib's are in short supply, hence the need for an intervention by strangers (govt.) to help them out.
JustAnotherFriedDay
Well-Known Member
And common sense is a result of experience.
Example,
Would you ever have the common sense to know that approaching a woman you are trying to attract by saying "Hey, what's up?" won't work if you didn't have the experience of rejection with that approach multiple times?
THAT EXPERIENCE would cause you to be more flexible and open (because you realize you were incorrect and/or unsuccessful) and with those two new found strengths you might decide to go get an education on attracting women.
People need to have a proper balance between there book smarts and street smarts in order to be truly successful with whatever ideas they are trying to convey.
CrackerJax
New Member
But you can see by some of the economic posts that some don't possess it at all.
JustAnotherFriedDay
Well-Known Member
Indeed. And you can also see the lack of education in people who just don't know what they are talking about (as far as facts go, not opinion).
doobnVA
Well-Known Member
NO, but the first sentence was, which is what I'm referring to. When I pointed out that the bold WASN'T redivider's statement at all, you insisted you weren't "in error", even though you were.
Seriously, can you NOT admit you were wrong even once when it's obvious that you were?
You have a problem.