NewGrowth
Well-Known Member
Yeah but it moisturizes, and you have heard how hot it is in hellI have always had a good complexion....
I took yer pepsi!
Yeah but it moisturizes, and you have heard how hot it is in hellI have always had a good complexion....
I took yer pepsi!
Hayduke bows in acceptance. Keeps all but the truly insane from reading them!BIGGEST multi-quote in RIU history.
I read it.....Yeah but it moisturizes, and you have heard how hot it is in hell
Hayduke bows in acceptance. Keeps all but the truly insane from reading them!
I have to be careful with those multi quotes... if the light in my office hits me at the wrong angle while I'm reading them i spas out.... ggaagagagumdrops.
So that "guy" finally got the hammer eh? I'm shocked...SHOCKED!!
Well guys and dolls I'm heading off to sugarplum land.
Nighty nite. smokem and sleep tight.
out. (yawn)
Thread dead?.... Welp, let's tally 'em up!
46.5% "believers"
to
53.5% "non-believers"
did that damned greenfinger dude get banned......finally?Ok... 40 more pages... 40 more votes... 1 infraction for mocking the guy who got banned... and now we have a new total.
46% BELIEVERs
54% NON BELIEVERS
Just about the same despite the more votes.
I'd be curious to know what percentage of those 46% are God believers but not religion believers.
Yes. I totally agree. I also knew (figured) if I put an option on there for the tons of other options that it would make the poll question too "easy" on some folks.Yes, well I posted earlier and this is no slight upon you IC but the question you started with is wide open to interpretation. Of course trying to pin the specifics down would make Sisyphus cringe.
out.
Atheists, when you say God, you are referring to that which you think does not exist. This is not the same God that believers refer to, how can it be?
Agnostics, when you speak of God, you are speaking of a subjective creation of your mind, that is expected to act according to your view of the world and cosmos.
When believers speak of God, it is from an objective point of view. That we are subject to a Creator, which smashes the ego with reality, and builds you up according to truth.
It is a human transgression that tortures his own children as if they were ants. God is love, and part of that parental love is giving a child freedom to make his/her own mistakes, after and sometimes before the child is necessarily ready... and always before the parent is ready. Parents know what I mean. God is not subject to our will, we are subject to God's will. Even if you do not believe God will let you live with your decision, but remember when you suddenly realise God exists, it is not your will that puts you at His side, and if you deny He has a will what can you expect to inherit.
Atheists, when you say God, you are referring to that which you think does not exist. This is not the same God that believers refer to, how can it be?No it is the same god. Sure he/she/it may look different cuz it is an image created either personally or adopted from another interpretation. We are not talking about greek gods or something completely different, and again you are not special, no special powers of insight
Agnostics, when you speak of God, you are speaking of a subjective creation of your mind, that is expected to act according to your view of the world and cosmos. No again we are talking about the same "idea" You have the correct definition within context of "subjective", unfortunately since you believe, you are speaking subjectively. Actually since Agnostics don't really know (true fence sitters) they are actually being more "objective", as they really do not have an opinion one way or another (Objective [in this case] is defined as not influenced by personal feelings or prejudice, unbiased).
When believers speak of God, it is from an objective point of view. That we are subject to a Creator, which smashes the ego with reality, and builds you up according to truth. Which of the 22 definitions of "objective" are you using here? Not one of the first 5...
When Earthists speak of the earth it smashes the ego with reality. This is real. This is important. The Earth is that which provides, protects and holds us close. Sh!tting on her because you believe this to be temporary is the ultimate false prophecy, and the belief that some imaginary dude has given humans dominion over all that the Earth holds close is the ultimate display of "ego".
It is a human transgression that tortures his own children as if they were ants. God is love, and part of that parental love is giving a child freedom to make his/her own mistakes, after and sometimes before the child is necessarily ready... and always before the parent is ready. Parents know what I mean. God is not subject to our will, we are subject to God's will. Even if you do not believe God will let you live with your decision, but remember when you suddenly realise God exists, it is not your will that puts you at His side, and if you deny He has a will what can you expect to inherit. Saying we are subject to god's will contradicts "it is a human [...] as if they were ants". And if humans are torturing god's children, and he/she/it does nothing (yea yea in this world blah blah) then he/she/it IS subject to the will of man.