so republicans need to ask themselves....Is Biden really that bad?Or Kamala could nominate her buddy Gavin Newsom as VP...
View attachment 5214438
It doesn’t matter bro. We could elect the most moderate younger, still white, male, and they’ll still find some stupid shit to bitch about even though their own party, and their leaders if in power, will do nothing that helps them. It’s all bad these days.so republicans need to ask themselves....Is Biden really that bad?
Seeing as how we've dropped below marginal, bringing us back up to at least the margin should be an obvious benefit. I'm not sure why you would ask such an obtuse question, especially considering the that you've intimated that you are working to make it "ok again" yourself. I'd call "ok" one step above marginal, so we're not too far apart on that, yet you choose to question me as if we have polar-opposing views. It seems to me that you are just digging for a debate, where perhaps one doesn't naturally occur. As far as the process, you know as well as I do, that it's not some simple answer, but of course it begins with policy changes which favor individuals rather than corporations.
Wow that old Geezer Biden 'seems' so out of touch and old (even though anyone who actually pays attention and watches his entire speeches can easily see he is all there). Maybe we should vote for the other party, what are they up to?
why would they do that? Harris wouldn't have won the election, and NO ONE voted for Hillary or Michelle Obama...what would the profit be for democrats?If the republicans win the majority in Nov, Biden could immediately resign and let Kamala become president & she could nominate Hillary for VP....or maybe Michelle Obama.
why would they do that? Harris wouldn't have won the election, and NO ONE voted for Hillary or Michelle Obama...what would the profit be for democrats?
Biden isn't a supreme court judge, where retiring at an opportune time ensures your party getting to pick your replacement.
and if he's still as mentally active and aware as he is now, why replace him? he's getting shit done.
Right, that's what we need in the Democratic party, more out of touch elitists. I swear, Kamala always has that same "I'm high on antidepressants right now" look on her face. Gavin sends his kids to private school, because he doesn't trust the public school system in the state he governs.Or Kamala could nominate her buddy Gavin Newsom as VP...
View attachment 5214438
President Biden would not be that cruel or that craven.why would they do that? Harris wouldn't have won the election, and NO ONE voted for Hillary or Michelle Obama...what would the profit be for democrats?
Biden isn't a supreme court judge, where retiring at an opportune time ensures your party getting to pick your replacement.
and if he's still as mentally active and aware as he is now, why replace him? he's getting shit done.
I don’t think it was sarcasm.
I think anyways, when you check out the third post he made about that.
I wouldn't worry about asking Republicans that, you'd be better off to ask independents and fringe democrats.so republicans need to ask themselves....Is Biden really that bad?
fixed.Right, that's what we need in the Democratic party, more out of touch elitists. I swear, Kamala always has that same "I'm high on antidepressants right now" look on her face. Gavin sends his kids to private school, because he doesn't trust the public school system in the state he governs.
no: because he can afford to give his kids a premium education in institutions that are not compelled to dance to the Republican tune. It isn’t Democrats who have gutted the public school system. It’s the chickens of long-term culture war coming home to roost. Look at the cosponsors list. Almost monolithically Republican. One Democrat, from Ohio.Right, that's what we need in the Democratic party, more out of touch elitists. I swear, Kamala always has that same "I'm high on antidepressants right now" look on her face. Gavin sends his kids to private school, because he doesn't trust the public school system in the state he governs.
Which "Republican Tune" are kids in California schools forced to dance to? Also, why can't California public schools provide that same premium education? California spends over $13k per kid in public school education, which is just about on par with private school costs in the state.no: because he can afford to give his kids a premium education in institutions that are not compelled to dance to the Republican tune. It isn’t Democrats who have gutted the public school system. It’s the chickens of long-term culture war coming home to roost.
I posted it; NCLB is national.Which "Republican Tune" are kids in California schools forced to dance to? Also, why can't California public schools provide that same premium education? California spends over $13k per kid in public school education, which is just about on par with private school costs in the state.
no...i must have missed the last post, or replied before i saw it...
I think anyways, when you check out the third post he made about that.
You pointed out that there was only one Democratic co-sponsor, but failed to mention that the bill passed with overwhelming bi-partisan support. That seems a bit dishonest on your part.I posted it; NCLB is national.