cannabineer
Ursus marijanus
how are they under contested airspace?Chaney's move fast. Halliburton can prove you wrong.
how are they under contested airspace?Chaney's move fast. Halliburton can prove you wrong.
I'll bet you they have or can get anything (through one or more of their subs) to protect their "What's good for Halliburton is good for America". Seeing how they shouldn't be getting a tax credit this year, it's the least they can do to recoup the loss.how are they under contested airspace?
now class, who here can tell me when non-national warfare began?I'll bet you they have or can get anything (through one or more of their subs) to protect their "What's good for Halliburton is good for America". Seeing how they shouldn't be getting a tax credit this year, it's the least they can do to recoup the loss.
good, Germans are lpg junkies, cut them the fuck off and watch them puke and shit on themselves during withdrawal...they'll either be stronger for it, or they'll fucking die...but same answer as a real junkie, better they fucking die than "live" like that...under putin's thumb, enabling his war on freedomNo stocking up for winter.
Russia cuts gas through Nord Stream 1 to 20% of capacity
Russia’s Gazprom on Wednesday halved the amount of natural gas flowing through a major pipeline from Russia to Europe to 20% of capacity. It’s the latest Nord Stream 1 reduction that Russia has blamed on technical problems but Germany calls a political move to sow uncertainty and push up prices amid the war in Ukraine.
The Russian state-controlled energy giant announced Monday that it would slash flows on the Nord Stream 1 pipeline that runs to Germany because of equipment repairs. It’s raised new fears that Russia could completely cut off gas that is used to power industry, generate electricity and heat homes to try to gain political leverage over Europe as it tries to bolster its storage levels for winter.
Nord Stream’s network data and the head of Germany’s network regulator, Klaus Mueller, confirmed the reduction.
“Gas is now a part of Russian foreign policy and possibly Russian war strategy,” Mueller told Deutschlandfunk radio.
Natural gas prices have surged on Europe’s TTF benchmark to levels not seen since early March and are nearly six times higher than they were a year ago. Soaring energy prices are fueling record inflation, squeezing people’s spending power and heightening concerns that Europe could plunge into recession if it does not save enough gas to get through the cold months.
That fear led EU governments on Tuesday to agree to reduce natural gas use to protect against further Russian supply cuts.
The draft law aims to lower demand for gas by 15% from August through March with voluntary steps. If there aren’t enough savings, mandatory cuts would be triggered in the 27-nation bloc.
Russia, which has reduced or cut off natural gas to 12 EU countries since the war, insists that the new drop-off through Nord Stream 1 is because maintenance is needed on a turbine for a compressor station and another turbine sent for repairs in Canada isn’t yet back in place. It has said the paperwork for the return of the latter turbine has raised questions about Western sanctions.
European leaders and analysts say the reductions are a pretext to try to divide EU countries and elevate prices.
“As before, we see no technical cause” for the cuts, German government spokeswoman Christiane Hoffmann said in Berlin, adding that “from our point of view, there is nothing standing in the way of transporting the turbine to Russia.”
“What we are seeing here is actually a power play, and we won’t let ourselves be impressed by that,” she added.
Gazprom’s latest move “seems to support our view that recent Russian cuts in flows are a purposeful deterioration in gas trade due to geopolitical escalations,” James Huckstepp, manager for Europe, Middle East and Africa gas analytics at S&P Global Commodity Insights, said in a research note Tuesday.
“That being the case, it increases our skepticism around Russian imports in the months ahead,” Huckstepp said.
Russia recently has accounted for about a third of Germany’s gas supplies. The government said last week that the drop in gas flows confirmed that Germany can’t rely on Russian deliveries, announcing that it would step up its gas storage requirements and take further measures to conserve supplies.
Russia cuts gas through Nord Stream 1 to 20% of capacity
BERLIN (AP) — Russia’s Gazprom on Wednesday halved the amount of natural gas flowing through a major pipeline from Russia to Europe to 20% of capacity. It’s the latest Nord Stream 1 reduction that …thehill.com
same reason it's a long shot a car will explode if you shoot the gas tank...it's designed not to. you can shoot a block of c4 with a rifle all day, and you'll just get a chunk of c4 with a lot of holes in it. impact isn't a reliable trigger, you need a detonation of a certain strength, to set most modern explosives off.How did the solid fuel in this rocket not ignite! Usually it would burn like Hell and considering the damage, it's surprisingly intact, there even appears to be solid fuel left!
UKRAINE DESTROYS THE PRAISED RUSSIAN S-300 AIR DEFENSE SYSTEMS || 2022
I believe these days they can break down heavier hydrocarbons into lighter fractions and also turn lighter fractions into heavier fuel to an extent during refining. More jet fuel as opposed to gasoline for future applications say.Even if our fossil carbon fuel use zeroes, we will still be pulling petroleum out of the ground. It is literally the starting material for the 20th Century*. There’s centuries of supply for manufacture, and we won’t run out ‘til the price of Kuiper tholeiitic tar (delivered) drops below oil’s.
Coal tar gets the Best Supporting Oscar for the second half of the 19th. But cars and aircraft would be expensive to fuel. Petroleum fixed that. Until the Otto motor became widely used, the light naphtha fraction from oil was waste. The motor turned oil’s liability (lotsa light hydrocarbon) into a feature, and the rest …
This shit burns, it does not explode normally and once lite is damn near impossible to put out.same reason it's a long shot a car will explode if you shoot the gas tank...it's designed not to. you can shoot a block of c4 with a rifle all day, and you'll just get a chunk of c4 with a lot of holes in it. impact isn't a reliable trigger, you need a detonation of a certain strength, to set most modern explosives off.
They can do a lot in Europe with energy efficiency measures, insulation and mass conversion to heat pumps could dramatically reduce demand for NG. Gasoline is easier to bring in via tanker and over the next decade demand for that should steadily diminish in Europe. Resistance heating is 100% efficient, 1 watt in 1 watt of heat out of the baseboard, however heat pumps using ground water loops give 5 watts of heat for every watt of electricity they use and regular heat pumps are 3X more efficient. Winters in Europe are generally milder than in North America and it was only in recent decades that most people in England had central heating, so heat pumps should work out there. Just doing those kinds of things could dramatically reduce demand for NG over the next few years. The automotive industry is getting ready to replace most of the car models with EVs, as soon as better batteries arrive and they are.good, Germans are lpg junkies, cut them the fuck off and watch them puke and shit on themselves during withdrawal...they'll either be stronger for it, or they'll fucking die...but same answer as a real junkie, better they fucking die than "live" like that...under putin's thumb, enabling his war on freedom
https://www.statista.com/statistics/232302/number-of-dwellings-in-england/They can do a lot in Europe with energy efficiency measures, insulation and mass conversion to heat pumps could dramatically reduce demand for NG. Gasoline is easier to bring in via tanker and over the next decade demand for that should steadily diminish in Europe. Resistance heating is 100% efficient, 1 watt in 1 watt of heat out of the baseboard, however heat pumps using ground water loops give 5 watts of heat for every watt of electricity they use and regular heat pumps are 3X more efficient. Winters in Europe are generally milder than in North America and it was only in recent decades that most people in England had central heating, so heat pumps should work out there. Just doing those kinds of things could dramatically reduce demand for NG over the next few years. The automotive industry is getting ready to replace most of the car models with EVs, as soon as better batteries arrive and they are.
Production rates of heat pumps can increase to meet demand and government initiatives can do a lot to stimulate this. Just converting to renewables won't do the job and reducing demand is the most logical solution for now and into the future. If there is a market in a capitalist society, the capacity to meet it will rapidly evolve and that includes contractor businesses that retrofit homes for increased energy efficiency.https://www.statista.com/statistics/232302/number-of-dwellings-in-england/
https://www.statista.com/statistics/767493/number-housing-france/
https://www.bbsr.bund.de/BBSR/EN/publications/AnalysenKompakt/Issues/ak-08-2021-dl.pdf?__blob=publicationFile&v=2
around 100 million separate homes in just those three countries...
https://www.statista.com/statistics/739745/heat-pumps-in-operation-eu/
it took them over 7 years to implement a 15% increase.
there are about 200 million separate dwellings in the E.U.
if a 15% increase took 15 years, a 50% increase should take about 50 years or so...
account for added government incentives, and you might take as much as five to seven years off of that.
around 180 million heat pumps are produced annually, worldwide...of course, the rest of the world will need supplied out of that too, so it would only take...4 or 5 years to get enough units...of course, every 5 to 10 years they will update equipment, make improvements, change regulations, so there's no point in buying more at one time than can be installed in one year....
then there is the retrofitting...not an easy task in a modern home, it's actually impossible in most homes built before 1900, you cannot install the correct type of insulation, and there is no space for the heating ducts...if the home is suitable for retrofitting, and you have all your materials on hand, it's still a week to ten day procces to get everything in place and working properly. that means a skilled crew with materials on hand can do 3 or 4 houses a month. how many crews are there doing this, and what are there levels of skill? i'm guessing that on average, they will be able to retrofit two or three houses a month per crew...
i'm not trying to jump on the bash D.I.Y. train, but you have to start thinking about the associated logistics to these "solutions"...you can't just get everyone in the EU that can actually use one, equipped with heat pumps in less than 15 years, and that's a conservative estimate