Bagginski
Well-Known Member
I guess he’d be okay w/ being treated as livestock…slaves were actually farmed for sellable offspring - or as Thomas Jefferson put it, for “their increase”. They were also in demand as sexual objects (forbidden of course to white women), so ‘gentlemen’ - perhaps a Senator Graham ancestor? - had a private playground in which to indulge their more…male proclivities without getting called names like faggot, queer, or Senator Graham.
Truly, enslavement of Africans ennobled even the lowest white man
Interesting, thinking of the new guy…those attitudes are learned early, typically from family members…he’s probably never actually *thought* about slavery - new-world, British-aristocrat created, economically-driven, color-coded, African chattel slavery (and mass kidnappings) in particular - in his entire life.
So many go through life, thinking they’re thinking…when all they’re doing is listening to old ‘tapes’ of things they’ve heard, & rolling them around in their heads while listening to Hanky & Quarrelsome
Truly, enslavement of Africans ennobled even the lowest white man
Interesting, thinking of the new guy…those attitudes are learned early, typically from family members…he’s probably never actually *thought* about slavery - new-world, British-aristocrat created, economically-driven, color-coded, African chattel slavery (and mass kidnappings) in particular - in his entire life.
So many go through life, thinking they’re thinking…when all they’re doing is listening to old ‘tapes’ of things they’ve heard, & rolling them around in their heads while listening to Hanky & Quarrelsome
Last edited:
