Russian Sanctions 2022 or Cashing in Putin's Plunder

hanimmal

Well-Known Member
Why? We have 50 + 1. We can bring the 400 forward and pass; make things happen because this unconstitutional 'deal' is not what the framers intended..why? because it doesn't work..dems are just too afraid to do anything without the others' consent.

That makes Schumer a cuck.
Sure doesn't. It is how it works. 48 Democrats are on board, 2 are not. Shit we were lucky that Georgia worked so hard to get Biden and the Democrats the ability to get anything done by electing 2 Democratic senators last year or we would be completely screwed right now.


TIME TO LEAD OR LET SOMEONE WHO WILL! I'm talking to you Democrats.

Citizens want movement; things to happen to take their minds off the current..a reason we lose the Midterms when we hold both chambers..citizens don't show because they think it's a waste of time..nothing happens- like right now..as more states go to 100% mail like Colorado that should change.
Yeah by voting in more Democrats is what I said that you asked 'why'.

Do you really think that a Republican senator is going to change the filibuster rules for anything good?
 

schuylaar

Well-Known Member
Sure doesn't. It is how it works. 48 Democrats are on board, 2 are not. Shit we were lucky that Georgia worked so hard to get Biden and the Democrats the ability to get anything done by electing 2 Democratic senators last year or we would be completely screwed right now.


Yeah by voting in more Democrats is what I said that you asked 'why'.

Do you really think that a Republican senator is going to change the filibuster rules for anything good?
The filibuster is unconstitutional and why our three separate but equal does not work and frankly, divisiveness is good politicking.
 

printer

Well-Known Member
The filibuster is unconstitutional and why our three separate but equal does not work and frankly, divisiveness is good politicking.
If most of the representatives were middle of the road and there was not the polaration that now exists the idea of the filibuster is not bad. But we do not live in that world now.
 

schuylaar

Well-Known Member
I remember when senators on opposite sides worked together to get stuff done, but then you had to elect a black man, not even an American.
No skirting my question, eh? Nice try:lol:

FTW This ain't Uncle Joe's Senate anymore and he found that out rather quickly, sadly.
 

printer

Well-Known Member
No skirting my question, eh? Nice try:lol:

FTW This ain't Uncle Joe's Senate anymore and he found that out rather quickly, sadly.
OK, before they tried to toss out Bill Clinton. I think things started to go south from there but then the Tea Party and then Trump put the last nail in the coffin.
 

schuylaar

Well-Known Member
Not a bad read.
What Caused the Bronze Age Collapse?
In a matter of decades, though, that thriving culture underwent a rapid and near-total collapse. After 1177 B.C., the survivors of this Bronze Age collapse were plunged into a centuries-long "Dark Ages" that saw the disappearance of some written languages and brought once-mighty kingdoms to their knees.

But what kind of catastrophic event could have triggered such a sudden and sweeping downfall?
It's likely that the simultaneous demise of so many ancient civilizations wasn't caused by a single event or disaster, but by a "perfect storm" of multiple stressors—an epic drought, desperate famine, roving marauders, and more—that toppled these interdependent kingdoms like dominos, according to Eric Cline, author of 1177 B.C.: The Year Civilization Collapsed.

Before the Fall
The author refers to this process as “globalization,” which seems a bit misleading given that the circuits of communication and exchange were regional, not worldwide. In any case, it had effects that can be traced in the layers of scattered archeological digs: commodities and artwork characteristic of one society catch on in another, and by the start of the 12th century a real cosmopolitanism is in effect. At the same time, the economic networks encouraged a market in foodstuffs as well as tin — the major precious resource of the day, something like petroleum became in the 20th century.

But evidence from the digs also shows two other developments during this period: a number of devastating earthquakes and droughts. Some of the cities that collapsed circa 1177 may have been destroyed by natural disaster, or so weakened that they succumbed far more quickly to the marauding Sea Peoples than they would have otherwise. For that matter, it is entirely possible that the Sea Peoples themselves were fleeing from such catastrophes. “In my opinion,” writes Cline, “… none of these individual factors would have been cataclysmic enough on their own to bring down even one of these civilizations, let alone all of them. However, they could have combined to produce a scenario in which the repercussions of each factor were magnified, in what some scholars have called a ‘multiplier effect.’ … The ensuing ‘systems collapse’ could have led to the disintegration of one society after another, in part because of the fragmentation of the global economy and the breakdown of the interconnections upon which each civilization was dependent."

This had the multiplier effect as far as China in written language.



It literally changed the world and thought to be the basis of Egyptian Plagues; they can be traced back to shift in weather patterning caused by this massive eruption.

I see nothing else during the Bronze Age of this magnitude..if you ever want to talk about Bronze Age Bog People- I'm your girl!
 
Last edited:
Top