the media and pundits should be held responsible for the consequences of their broadcasted opinions

cannabineer

cannabineer

Ursus marijanus
PJ Diaz said:
No, to those who can view the world through unbiased lenses, it's quite apparent. The fact that you even use that moniker is clear evidence of your biases.
Click to expand...
We have two political parties. Racism and its attendant social ills are to be found almost exclusively in the one that went rogue. You must be using the “proven-liar” right-wing press.
or vids, and many vids lie! Thats why it is necessary to use principled center-of-spectrum wire services, notably AP and Reuters. “Media bias fact check” is a useful tool that reveals a drop in reliability as a service is more to the right. It’s the GQP for a reason! I mean, MTG! The worst the Ds can show is a couple of aisle-crossing opportunists.
 
PJ Diaz

PJ Diaz

Well-Known Member
cannabineer said:
We have two political parties. Racism and its attendant social ills are to be found almost exclusively in the one that went rogue. You must be using the “proven-liar” right-wing press.
or vids, and many vids lie! Thats why it is necessary to use principled center-of-spectrum wire services, notably AP and Reuters. “Media bias fact check” is a useful tool that reveals a drop in reliability as a service is more to the right. It’s the GQP for a reason! I mean, MTG! The worst the Ds can show is a couple of aisle-crossing opportunists.
Click to expand...
We have more than two political parties. You are stuck in your own self-constructed paradigm.
 
MICHI-CAN

MICHI-CAN

Well-Known Member
PJ Diaz said:
We have more than two political parties. You are stuck in your own self-constructed paradigm.
Click to expand...
We have political prostitutes and those not invited to the party.
As we orally fellatio eachother instead of saying apply the laws as already written. Sherman anti-trust would start us and Clinton's FCC declarations be rescinded.????? Keep pricking eachother. Plenty of fodder to be served.
 
Popop

Popop

Well-Known Member
Roger A. Shrubber said:
wtf is that? a link to a bullshit "mini-documentary" from glenn greenwald? tucker carlson's frequent guest?....that's proof to you?...¿
i won't say greenwald is stupid, far from it, but he is biased, so your proof is the opinion of one biased person?
Click to expand...
Holy smokes....open your blinds guy

Wow
 
cannabineer

cannabineer

Ursus marijanus
PJ Diaz said:
Why? The House of Representatives doesn't count?
Click to expand...
Between the two chambers there is only one: Cortes from California. Three others identify as independent i. e. no affiliation.

This does not diminish my perception that third-party electees are a fluke. We have effectively two parties that have separated like cheap ketchup: Reason and Treason.
 
HGCC

HGCC

Well-Known Member
To those ends, I think the argument that choosing the lesser of two evils is still evil is bullshit. It's a binary decision, sitting on the sidelines making a moral vote that doesn't have a chance at actually winning or being implemented is the same as not having a view.
 
cannabineer

cannabineer

Ursus marijanus
HGCC said:
To those ends, I think the argument that choosing the lesser of two evils is still evil is bullshit. It's a binary decision, sitting on the sidelines making a moral vote that doesn't have a chance at actually winning or being implemented is the same as not having a view.
Click to expand...
Though I am impressed that Cortes, a true socialist, got in.
 
PJ Diaz

PJ Diaz

Well-Known Member
HGCC said:
To those ends, I think the argument that choosing the lesser of two evils is still evil is bullshit. It's a binary decision, sitting on the sidelines making a moral vote that doesn't have a chance at actually winning or being implemented is the same as not having a view.
Click to expand...
That's seriously one of the dumbest things that I've ever heard. It's pretty clear that you feel forced to vote for a lessor evil, and that's exactly what the political system wants the populus to believe.
 
HGCC

HGCC

Well-Known Member
We don't agree on lots man, it is what it is. I absolutely compromise my ideals for the greater good as it were. Most of us aren't in places where anything else would be at all viable.

That 51st district in CA wasn't what I was expecting, it does have unique features though. I like to see far left candidates in solid blue areas. Various people make the point that the left candidates don't win and can't get stuff done, that's valid, I think running in safe areas is the only way they can build a track record.
 
cannabineer

cannabineer

Ursus marijanus
HGCC said:
We don't agree on lots man, it is what it is. I absolutely compromise my ideals for the greater good as it were. Most of us aren't in places where anything else would be at all viable.

That 51st district in CA wasn't what I was expecting, it does have unique features though. I like to see far left candidates in solid blue areas. Various people make the point that the left candidates don't win and can't get stuff done, that's valid, I think running in safe areas is the only way they can build a track record.
Click to expand...
I want that insurrectionist out of district 23.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top