Was Biden a good choice or was he the only choice?

hanimmal

Well-Known Member
I know you didn't say you worshipped Hillary. Didn't mean to imply that. As far as my opinion on 2016 I think I'm in good company but you're allowed your opinion.


You do understand that a large part of the attack on our society was to radicalize people who would otherwise vote Democrat against Clinton right?

Screen Shot 2021-12-10 at 4.25.33 PM.png

If I was you and you still feel this strongly about it, I would double check the things that are important to you (about disliking her) on the AP news to make sure you are not still caught up in the propaganda.
 

SmichiganOG

Well-Known Member
lulz

I read that bit of fluff and much more informative articles too., such as this one:


The optics on this scandal are terrible. Political opponents to the established Democratic Party leaders had a field day. But I knew when you started spouting the extreme propaganda lines from Clinton's most extreme critics where you were going. I knew that I owned you.

Hillary Clinton's campaign agreed to rescue the DNC after they ran out of money. In exchange for keeping the DNC on life support and saving the Democratic Party the embarrassment of a public bankruptcy they gave the money with strings attached. It was legal. It was sure as hell sketchy. If one wants to point out that Hillary Clinton was embroiled in sketchy but legal scandals, I'd agree.

What else is said about this scandal is nobody was hurt. Bernie wasn't even using funds from the DNC. He had agreed to pay the DNC a certain amount to use DNC infrastructure, which he used but didn't pay for. He broke an agreement with the DNC and "Clinton's controlled DNC" just looke the other way.

Clinton did not control DNC's funds, she controlled her campaign's funds. Donna Brazille said so. You can take things out of context and pull a sentence out that looks like you are speaking truth. In context and in Brazille's own words, she described a sketchy but legal and reasonable funding mechanism to keep the DNC running during the primary.

I just owned you, bitch. Go make me a sammich.
You said she didn't say it. She said it. But you own me? You're a half step from being a Trumper. Sure you don't want to build a wall and have Mexico pay for it? There's always been corruption on both sides. Post Trump the GQP has lost control. Fact is you don't own shit. Always get this irascible When others don't agree with you? What a snowflake. Ashamed we're in the same political party.
 

SmichiganOG

Well-Known Member
You do understand that a large part of the attack on our society was to radicalize people who would otherwise vote Democrat against Clinton right?

View attachment 5044213

If I was you and you still feel this strongly about it, I would double check the things that are important to you (about disliking her) on the AP news to make sure you are not still caught up in the propaganda.
It's past history. She's out of the running. In any case, since Jimmy Carter it's been a case of voting for the less crooked crook.
 

Fogdog

Well-Known Member
You said she didn't say it. She said it. But you own me? You're a half step from being a Trumper. Sure you don't want to build a wall and have Mexico pay for it? There's always been corruption on both sides. Post Trump the GQP has lost control. Fact is you don't own shit. Always get this irascible When others don't agree with you? What a snowflake. Ashamed we're in the same political party.
she did not say it.

She said Clinton gave the DNC money with strings attached that gave the a lot of influence on how the money was spent. What you are doing is jumping to a conclusion that is convenient to a story you are spinning.

Otherwise known as lying.
 

SmichiganOG

Well-Known Member
You do understand that a large part of the attack on our society was to radicalize people who would otherwise vote Democrat against Clinton right?

View attachment 5044213

If I was you and you still feel this strongly about it, I would double check the things that are important to you (about disliking her) on the AP news to make sure you are not still caught up in the propaganda.
she did not say it.

She said Clinton gave the DNC money with strings attached that gave the a lot of influence on how the money was spent. What you are doing is jumping to a conclusion that is convenient to a story you are spinning.

Otherwise known as lying.
Nope. Never lied. Article after article states That Brazile said Clinton took over the DNC but like most Trumpers it's you putting the spin on it. It was still unethical. Incidentally, lying isn't illegal either, but it is unethical. But since you take this so seriously, you win tiger! Feel better now? Ever question the donors to TCF?
 

CatHedral

Well-Known Member
Nope. Never lied. Article after article states That Brazile said Clinton took over the DNC but like most Trumpers it's you putting the spin on it. It was still unethical. Incidentally, lying isn't illegal either, but it is unethical. But since you take this so seriously, you win tiger! Feel better now? Ever question the donors to TCF?
The simple fact that you call that user a Trumper kills the rest of your argument.
 

SmichiganOG

Well-Known Member
The simple fact that you call that user a Trumper kills the rest of your argument.
It's really only so important. He's calling me a liar when a good many articles state exactly what I Said. In that regard he's convinced that he's right when he isn't. Maybe I'm using the wrong label but to me that's what Trumpers are all about.
 

CatHedral

Well-Known Member
It's really only so important. He's calling me a liar when a good many articles state exactly what I Said. In that regard he's convinced that he's right when he isn't. Maybe I'm using the wrong label but to me that's what Trumpers are all about.
The trouble with “a good many articles” is that that no longer means diddly. There are so many publishers of untruth these days. So it would be needful to have links for all these many articles.
 

Fogdog

Well-Known Member
Nope. Never lied. Article after article states That Brazile said Clinton took over the DNC but like most Trumpers it's you putting the spin on it. It was still unethical. Incidentally, lying isn't illegal either, but it is unethical. But since you take this so seriously, you win tiger! Feel better now? Ever question the donors to TCF?
nope. You are lying.

Brazille never said what you claim and we are just revisiting the very point where you departed from the truth. Clinton did not take over the DNC and Brazille never said that. I posted a very good facts filled article that explains the whole thing. But maybe you are not lying and are simply unable to read past what you want the words to say.
 

SmichiganOG

Well-Known Member
The trouble with “a good many articles” is that that no longer means diddly. There are so many publishers of untruth these days. So it would be needful to have links for all these many articles.
Okay. He enjoys being irascible Way too much. He's the little bitch.
 

Antidote Man

Well-Known Member
there is way, way too much truth out there for any one mind to grasp. this, obviously, includes sifting out whats false. Go on, try it. I dare you.
 
Top