Anyone else watching the Kyle Rittenhouse trial?

[mooray]

Kyle was better at playing soldier than everyone that's either dead, or has half their bicep missing.

 

[hanimmal]

i never saw the picture of him crying. fucking great lol. I guess kyle was better at "playing soldier in the streets" eh?

So yeah, now that you get your bullshit trolling out of the way.

He would have easily been able to shoot Rittenhouse and never did. So in shooting that guy there was no self defense. Rittenhouse was fleeing the scene of someone he shot to death while still armed and killed another person and shot a third because he was scared and was radicalized to think it was just fine for him to be carrying a AR outside of his home and even his state.

 

[BodegaBud]

The friend selling him the gun illegally I believe is the felony.

I wonder if the judge is going to allow the video of Rittenhouse saying he wished he had his AR to start blowing people away when he thought they were ripping off the CVS.

Would you be ok if some 17 year old kid from a different state went and stood outside projects somewhere with a gun and waited for someone to 'scare' him and started picking people off?

ps You never said, are you equally ok with the guy that killed the Trump supporter in Portland?

If a guy went to the projects and waited to shoot somebody that would be premeditated because his intent was to kill or maim. Now if he was armed walking by the projects and attacked them defended himself he would be justified in doing so. As far as the Trump supporter that was shot I’m not familiar with the case. If he was defending himself then he was defending himself but again it also comes down to intent. We are supposed to be unbiased in things like this or the whole system is fucked

 

[mooray]

If a guy went to the projects and waited to shoot somebody that would be premeditated because his intent was to kill or maim. Now if he was armed walking by the projects and attacked them defended himself he would be justified in doing so. As far as the Trump supporter that was shot I’m not familiar with the case. If he was defending himself then he was defending himself but again it also comes down to intent. We are supposed to be unbiased in things like this or the whole system is fucked

Unbiased, as in, where it's really easy to answer a simple question and not be dodgy because you don't want someone you like to look bad..? That kind of unbiased?

 

[Fogdog]

Minor in possession is not a felony. I think it was stupid for anyone to be out there that night after curfew. One thing that I think they will have to decide is intent. Did he go down there looking for a fight or was he really just trying to protect a business. There were a couple of times on the videos where people engaged him looking for a fight and he in one walked away and in another responded to somebody talking shit “ I love you too.” I don’t see intent or as someone else said “ Hunting” because he turned down the opportunity several times. People were throwing tear gas bombs on them, hurling rocks,lighting fires, ect and he never fired around until he was chased and another guy fired off rounds.

blah blah blah

The same mindless defense of Eric Chauvin came from goons like you when that trial was going down. I have no idea what the jury will decide but I know damn well that you don't have a clue about what happened in Kenosha. You are just parroting some right wing bullshit from the same sources who claim Trump won the election and the Jan 6 seditionists were peaceful patriots.

I didn't think the jury in the Chauvin trial would convict. I was wrong. Prosecutors had a strong case and made it. Seems that they are making as good of a case here. But I don't have any idea what the jury will decide.

Oh, and a skateboard makes a terrible axe. Just saying, if I were in the jury, Rittenhouse's attorney would have lost me there and then when he talked about him being in danger of decapitation from a skateboard. I'm getting used to your kind's histrionics. They don't concern me any more.

 

[Hiddengems]

Yeah weird how a little fascist coup keeps people worried

Jan 6 and an idiot no longer in office aren't winning campaign points, like it or not.
People were interested in local problems. Forcing national issues into every local race doesn't work.

 

[UncleBuck]

The issue is if it was self defense and I have been watching the trial and everything in my mind if I was on the jury so far would point to yes.

he shot the guy in the back in self defense?

ok retard

 

[UncleBuck]

That all sounds WAY too nuanced, logical and thought out. We pick a side and call people names here sir. You sure youre not a white supremacist righty or whatever?

logically shooting someone in the back in self defense. makes as much sense as a business that got DeStRoYeD!!!!11!!1 but is open right now

 

[hanimmal]

If a guy went to the projects and waited to shoot somebody that would be premeditated because his intent was to kill or maim. Now if he was armed walking by the projects and attacked them defended himself he would be justified in doing so.

What if they just said that they were there to 'defend' a park bench or something? Keep in mind they don't live there and came from out of state.

On a side note, I guess it would also be worth considering that people who are affiliated with the ones that Rittenhouse was LARP'ing with turned out to be the domestic terrorists that were shooting up the police headquarters and setting fire to the buildings that they were then conveniently 'protecting'.

https://www.rollitup.org/t/the-people-behind-the-violence-in-the-american-protests-of-george-floyd.1018871/post-16073611

As far as the Trump supporter that was shot I’m not familiar with the case. If he was defending himself then he was defending himself but again it also comes down to intent. We are supposed to be unbiased in things like this or the whole system is fucked

Yeah kind of funny that way.

It is a shame we won't get to know since Dear Leader tweeted about it and the radicalized cops shot him up for over a minute with their body cams off.

https://www.rollitup.org/t/anyone-else-watching-the-kyle-rittenhouse-trial.1065377/post-16628165

 

[BodegaBud]

One thing I don’t think a lot of people have pointed out is how many armed people actually chased and attacked him. Look in the background at the amount of people and the weapons some had. IMHO he showed tremendous restraint given the situation. When he is walking away after shooting you can hear people shooting at him from a distance. He actually gave the guy he shot in the arm a chance to gtfo even after running up on him. But the guy raised his gun towards Rittenhouse and got shot. It kind of reminds me of the OK corral. Rittenhouse was very lucky that night and things could of gone way different had he done any one thing differently.

 

[UncleBuck]

I’m just trying to look at it fairly.

LOL

 

[hanimmal]

One thing I don’t think a lot of people have pointed out is how many armed people actually chased and attacked him. Look in the background at the amount of people and the weapons some had. IMHO he showed tremendous restraint given the situation. When he is walking away after shooting you can hear people shooting at him from a distance. He actually gave the guy he shot in the arm a chance to gtfo even after running up on him. But the guy raised his gun towards Rittenhouse and got shot. It kind of reminds me of the OK corral. Rittenhouse was very lucky that night and things could of gone way different had he done any one thing differently.



View attachment 5023642View attachment 5023643

By fleeing the scene of someone he murdered?

 

[schuylaar]

No they didn't, the guy was right ontop of him and didn't shoot Rittenhouse even after getting shot himself. You are just making shit up now to pretend like this idiot kid should get off because he got spooked and started dropping bodies.

View attachment 5023637

if only he would've shot back; saved us all the time..totally justified.

 

[Fogdog]

Jan 6 and an idiot no longer in office aren't winning campaign points, like it or not.
People were interested in local problems. Forcing national issues into every local race doesn't work.

I know,

Employment AND wages are up. 2022 looks to be a very good year for working people.

I can totally understand why a Republican doesn't want that to happen right now.

 

[UncleBuck]

blah blah blah

The same mindless defense of Eric Chauvin came from goons like you when that trial was going down. I have no idea what the jury will decide but I know damn well that you don't have a clue about what happened in Kenosha. You are just parroting some right wing bullshit from the same sources who claim Trump won the election and the Jan 6 seditionists were peaceful patriots.

I didn't think the jury in the Chauvin trial would convict. I was wrong. Prosecutors had a strong case and made it. Seems that they are making as good of a case here. But I don't have any idea what the jury will decide.

Oh, and a skateboard makes a terrible axe. Just saying, if I were in the jury, Rittenhouse's attorney would have lost me there and then when he talked about him being in danger of decapitation from a skateboard. I'm getting used to your kind's histrionics. They don't concern me any more.

i hear it's legal to shoot someone in the back now as long as you find out later that they did some other unrelated crime in the past. thats called being nuanced and logical and not emotional and biased

 

[UncleBuck]

Jan 6 and an idiot no longer in office aren't winning campaign points, like it or not.
People were interested in local problems. Forcing national issues into every local race doesn't work.

dont care. we're not gonna stop talking about your fascism for any reason. learn to deal with your hurt feelings.

 

[BodegaBud]

Unbiased, as in, where it's really easy to answer a simple question and not be dodgy because you don't want someone you like to look bad..? That kind of unbiased?

Ok how am I being dodgy? You are giving me a possible scenario and I’m responding. The other guy I never heard of

 

[UncleBuck]

armed people actually chased and attacked him.

it's called apprehending an active shooter who just fatally shot someone in the back

 

[UncleBuck]

Ok how am I being dodgy?

do you think it's ok to shoot someone in the back as long as you find out later that they had committed some unrelated crimes in the past

 

[mooray]

Ok how am I being dodgy? You are giving me a possible scenario and I’m responding. The other guy I never heard of

I keep asking you the same question and you won't answer. That's how.