Where did they say it is a total waste of time?So now you want to play the semantics game. Fine, it serves no purpose. Does that make you feel better. You know what I meant, why do people just want to argue.
citation
COVID-19 ARCHIVED WEBPAGE
This historical page is not up to date. Find the latest on COVID-19.www.cdc.gov
"Masks may not be necessary when you are outside by yourself away from others, or with people who live in your household."
It is normal in some parts of the world, mostly where it is so incredibly polluted people need them due to such poor air quality. That is not the case here in Canada. Perhaps it's because I am so tired from working in Covid hell. I have 74 active patients in the building I am sitting in at this moment. Perhaps its seeing these people makes you feel like no place is safe or masks are normal when neither is true. Outside on your own is perfectly safe and as such feels like a small piece of normal. The fact that it bothers me should not bother you. I don't go up to people and tell them what to do and I don't accept people telling me how I should feel about things. You are free to do what you like and I am not going to try to stop you however I deserve the same respect.
Fuck you can barely think, much less write it down!
You were shaming the man for saying it is an extreme position to wear a mask alone outside, in the context of the pandemic, not allergies.
Interesting how you completely ignore the point that the risks are shown to be occurring 100x more often that the CDC has speculated. The point you chose to argue is a different (yet parallel) point all together. However to that point, are you expecting that every person with a food allergy will have an anaphylactic reaction???Do you ever question the stupid shit you think matters because you seem to really want to believe that people should stay unsafe because you have allergies.
Now it is early, and I am not even a couple sips into my coffee.
But 52,805 (employees) *.02(the percent of that group that had a allergic reaction = 1056 people had allergic reactions.
And in that group of 52,805, 4,000 people had 'significant allergies to food and medications', while only 1056 had a reaction to the vaccine according to the part you posted. 4000>1056. Basically meaning a quarter of the people you would expect to have issues with the vaccine actually did.
You know what, talking to you is the waste of time. I told you what I meant by that, you are just being an idiot.
You’re 3 what? 3 Years old? 3 IQ points short of 50? A 3 time convicted felon?
I'm in Canada too and in a rural location, NS, we recently cracked down to control covid cases until enough folks are vaccinated. Alberta recently topped all the American states and is now #1 for infection rates in North America. Ontario is in a state of crises and Doug Ford freaked out as did the premier of Alberta. We will be masked up for while, I see a lot of mask compliance where I live, but not too many people wearing them outside, unless required or traveling in groups. If you are alone without a mask outside and away from other people, no one will bother you.
This makes no sense. If the spike protein was being spread, then that would mean the vaccine immunity is being spread without the need to get the shot! We do realize that the vaccines use the spike protein (without using the actual virus at all) to cause our own natural immune system to begin fighting the process that the virus uses to invade our cells, before ever encountering the virus. I am not a virologist so I am gonna need a citation.
Math is not my strong point, could you help me figure out the percentage of people that had an adverse reaction?
OK, so then explain yourself. What did you mean when you were making a hash of the English language?
.016% of all injections resulted in an adverse reaction.
The fashion or health and safety measures others take to protect themselves from anything, should not be subject to criticism. Not wearing a mask might be subject to such criticism, depending on the circumstances, like here in Canada where the pandemic is raging in many places and local officials are panicking and freaking out. Our vaccination rate is a fraction of the American rate and only a 3rd of Canadians have received one dose. I won't get my second Pfizer until August 7th. Let's just say that 80% protection may cause many asymptomatic cases or sniffles and greatly increased community spread to the unvaccinated, including children.
Awww... you spoiled the surprise.
Yep, I'm quite aware of that, and it is indeed a possibility. If you look in the Pfizer documents for how they ran their clinical trials, they were clearly concerned about that possibility as well, because they put requirements for contact tracing of any person that a vaccinated person in the test trial came in contact with. The one thing we haven't seen however is the result of those tracings.
Here's the thing though.. Doctors aren't reporting all (most) of the reactions, even when they seem them in their own office. This has been shown time and time again.
That is a responsible way to do things. I have been vaccinated. I wear a mask, face shield and gown half the time at my work. I wear a mask when indoors among people, I wear a mask when outside among people. I wear a mask everyplace it will serve a purpose. I totally agree with that.