Let's talk about guns. . . . . .

Biden to Nominate Anti-Second Amendment Judge Merrick Garland for Attorney General

Garland’s anti-Second Amendment position is clear from his record. Garland does not believe the Second Amendment protects an individual right to keep and bear arms.
 
doublejj said:
Biden to Nominate Anti-Second Amendment Judge Merrick Garland for Attorney General

Garland’s anti-Second Amendment position is clear from his record. Garland does not believe the Second Amendment protects an individual right to keep and bear arms.
Click to expand...
Shocker.
 
doublejj said:
Biden to Nominate Anti-Second Amendment Judge Merrick Garland for Attorney General

Garland’s anti-Second Amendment position is clear from his record. Garland does not believe the Second Amendment protects an individual right to keep and bear arms.
Click to expand...
JHFC, it doesnt fucking matter what he believes! The USSC is what matters, and they're not doing shit about guns, just like the pusssies in Congress. But you go right ahead and inflame yourself anyway.
 
injinji said:
When I posted on tractorbynet, there was an English farmer who posted on there. He had to go down to the police station once a year (if my memory is correct) to renew the license for his rifle. No big deal.
Click to expand...



Now, English are being told to wear a mask during sex or to jack off.

This ISN'T YOUR WEAPON, This ISN'T YOUR GUN. No big deal?
 
doublejj said:
Biden to Nominate Anti-Second Amendment Judge Merrick Garland for Attorney General

Garland’s anti-Second Amendment position is clear from his record. Garland does not believe the Second Amendment protects an individual right to keep and bear arms.
Click to expand...
Can you elaborate JJ. I’m not seeing anti 2nd amendment positions, just IMO, warranted legislation re handguns and automatic weapons but that is only a quick read, I’m sure you all are more up to date than I.
 
doublejj said:
Biden to Nominate Anti-Second Amendment Judge Merrick Garland for Attorney General

Garland’s anti-Second Amendment position is clear from his record. Garland does not believe the Second Amendment protects an individual right to keep and bear arms.
Click to expand...
Until 2008 the Supreme Court held the position that the 2nd Amendment meant that A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms shall not be infringed.
 
doublejj said:
he has battled the NRA for years.....not that that's a bad thing. I quit the NRA decades ago
Click to expand...
As he should and yes good for you. The NRA is no longer the true representative of responsible gun ownership. So what was your point? Do you honestly think he wants to abolish the 2nd or clarify what it was meant to address.
 
doublejj said:
change is coming....
Click to expand...
I personally would love to not see guns in our state capital ever again in the hands of crazy potential domestic terrorists.

Screen Shot 2021-01-09 at 2.46.18 PM.png


But I am not holding my breath for Biden to be able to do anything about that.

And if he does, it is still on Trump for causing it to happen after months of egging on these radicalized assholes to the point something has to be done for the safety of our citizens.
 
I’m hoping for responsible gun ownership. IMO there is no reason to have carry laws for handguns. No reason to allow high cap mags. Huge reasons for training and licensing. I live in a country with a completely different mindset where people don’t think they require a gun stuck in their waist to protect them so I’m not really suited for this debate.
 
Jimdamick said:
I sucked with long bows. I never attained the strength needed to hold the string long enough for a good/clean shot.
I'm a compound guy.
PSE all the way :)

View attachment 4782605
Click to expand...
When I was a kid, my father had a recurve bow. I couldn't hold it really, let alone string it or use it.

I've always wanted to get a bow and learn to use it.

Man, there's so many things I wanted to do in life that I never got around to doing. Most of them the simple things.
 
doublejj said:
Biden to Nominate Anti-Second Amendment Judge Merrick Garland for Attorney General

Garland’s anti-Second Amendment position is clear from his record. Garland does not believe the Second Amendment protects an individual right to keep and bear arms.
Click to expand...


If individuals have no right to keep and bear arms, they couldn't possibly have given that right to anyone in the government who alleges to be their representative.

Since Government DOES keep and bear arms, and will need guns to disarm people, Merrick Garland must believe that Government is the source of rights and that "nongovernment people" are subjects, to be ruled. Sounds like a full blown Commie. Gee, what a surprise.
 
Rob Roy said:
If individuals have no right to keep and bear arms, they couldn't possibly have given that right to anyone in the government who alleges to be their representative.

Since Government DOES keep and bear arms, and will need guns to disarm people, Merrick Garland must believe that Government is the source of rights and that "nongovernment people" are subjects, to be ruled. Sounds like a full blown Commie. Gee, what a surprise.
Click to expand...
it's just to bad the republicans couldn't come up with a better candidate for president....choices have consequences.....
 
doublejj said:
it's just to bad the republicans couldn't come up with a better candidate for president....choices have consequences.....
Click to expand...


Voting and choices are polar opposites though.

Voting for anyone to rule you, self evidently, is not about choices, but it does come with consequences.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top