Fogdog
Well-Known Member
What you just wrote fits a classic fallacy of logic known a "strawman argument". Asking a leading question is not "talking scientifically".It's really not for the purpose of convincing anyone, I have no agenda behind what I'm saying, I'm putting the truth as I know it to be down for others to read and question for themselves, I won't be forcing a horse to drink water anytime soon.
If you want to talk scientifically about the virus I can do that too, my question to you is how does a virus that is deadly, suddenly differentiate itself from other similar viruses and remain contagious for a month at a time without any symptoms, and only effects people who are elderly or already diagnosed with a pre-existing conditions? Why suddenly at the beginning of 2020 do we have this type of perfect storm in the form of a deadly virus unknown to mankind, released in an almost theatrical manner?
If you want to "talk scientifically", first, don't quote your navel -- it's not a reliable source of information, second, use verifiable facts that pertain to your subject that confirms your claim, third, don't claim a WW2 Nazi program is responsible for creating a virus when the technology wasn't even invented until 50 or so years later. We didn't even know the structure of DNA back then, much less our own genome, much less the genome of coronavirus.
Here is an example of a scientific argument that supports the hypothesis that this virus is natural, recent and not out of a lab:
The proximal origin of SARS-CoV-2 - Nature Medicine
www.nature.com
Refute that, if you want. Specifically, where does this team of researchers get it wrong.