Nute company runs experiment that concludes you should use more nutes? -
it doesnt conclude that, again, confirmation bias. You have an idea in your head,, so your creating ways to try and make reality fit your idea. They simply conclude that flushed vs non flushed has no statistical differance (i.e slight differences may appear but nothing significant enough to make conclusions) in terms of chemical makeup. And their own feeding schedule recommends a "flush" at 8 weeks, or at the very least not adding nutrients, so there goes that thought.
Their final point is flushing is not needed, yet all of their results point to very little difference in 14 day and 0 day flush.
So why wouldnt you then? The 14 day flush even came in about 5grams heavier. -
5grams is in the realm of statistical error, not proof of anything one way or another. As for flushing, i could make the same kind of statement in reverse... why would you run copious amounts of water through the medium, or starve a plant for 2 weeks prior to harvest if it does nothing helpful?
And their taste test is a crock of shit. Who the hell cares what 'leading cannabis experts' think about the taste of weed. I dont particularly value the input into a scientific study of a bunch of stoned guys. -
You won't trust "a bunch of stoned guys" but you'll trust your stoned self or friends? Again, confirmation bias... regardless if they are experts or not, a blind taste test doesn't lie... everyone picks which weed they liked best, and you tally votes. Just because YOU don't like it, doesn't mean that majority of people feel the same way you do...
Ill stuck with my flush. Tastes and smokes better to ME. And i dont spend 2 weeks mixing nutes -
YOU can do whatever you want... thats the beauty of life brother... doesnt make it right though..
And on that note, I'll stop responding about it now... link says it all, no need for me to beat a dead, unflushed horse