Interweb BS?
Could you even be bothered to read the article? It's not BS. It's interesting stuff. You're response is just bizarre.
The guy using baked pollen has a PhD., is Vice President of research at the University of Lethbridge, has 150 peer reviewed publications and 10 patents. He's involved in studies that they spend millions conducting. He's using baked flour so I don't know how you can call that interweb BS.
Like I asked. Did you bake the flour before you used it? Most flour is 10 - 14% moisture. So if you didn't bake it you stored your pollen with flour that contained moisture. Using flour is not BS. Flour is used to extend pollen for other plants as well. It's use is all over the place from Universities to just about every cannabis site or forum that has a topic on storing pollen.
I'm going take guidance from someone with a background in plant biotechnolgy and a plethora of other advanced topics than some dude on the interweb as you call it. The guy is doing research on the long term storage of cannabis pollen. Not just 18 months but theoretically indefinitely.
You're free to use whatever method you wish. But to go on about people making false claims and interweb BS is ridiculous. I've provided data based on a scientifically conducted study by people much smarter than you or me with regards to this subject.
Dr. Kovalchuk’s research studies genetic and epigenetic regulation of plant responses to stress, while also developing methods for improving plant transformation. As a researcher in epigenetics, epigenomics, bioinformatics, genetic engineering, plant biotechnology, and next generation sequencing, Dr. Kovalchuk has over 150 peer reviewed publications and holds ten patents.
www.uleth.ca