))))))))
If there is no camera, then you need to draw))))) Savages!))))
You don't know this, but I know everything, Bro!
There is not even a hint of the photo))))
Proskudin-Gorsky
first color photos 1905 ..........
Are you kidding about the cameras?
View attachment 4654579View attachment 4654580View attachment 4654581View attachment 4654583
Free news photographers and other independent people photographing real events like the imposed famine in the Ukraine. Here read this book and educate yourself to your own history, another thing lost under totalitarian governments
Robert Conquest, Harvest of sorrow
The Harvest of Sorrow: Soviet Collectivization and the Terror-famine is a book by British historian
Robert Conquest, published in 1986. It was written with the assistance of historian
James Mace, a junior fellow at the Ukrainian Research Institute, who, following the advice of the director of the Institute, started doing research for the book.
[1]
The book deals with the collectivization of agriculture in 1929–31 in
Ukraine and elsewhere in the USSR under Stalin's direction, and the
1932–33 famine which resulted. Millions of peasants died due to starvation, deportation to
labor camps, and execution. Conquest's thesis was characterized as "the famine was deliberately inflicted for ethnic reasons"
or that it constituted genocide.[2][3]:507
According to
David R. Marples, the book was generally well received, but also served as an indicator of divisions in Western scholarship on the subject.
[3]:507
Largely accepting his thesis was Geoffrey A. Hosking, who wrote that "Conquest’s research establishes beyond doubt, however, that the famine was deliberately inflicted there [in Ukraine] for ethnic reasons—it was done in order to undermine the Ukrainian nation". Peter Wiles of the London School of Economics, stated that "Conquest had 'adopted the Ukraine exile view [on the origins of the famine of 1932–1933], and he has persuaded this reviewer'".
[3]:507
Craig Whitney in a
New York Times book review stated: "The eyewitness testimony may be reliable, but far more debatable is the thesis that the famine was specifically aimed as an instrument of genocide against the Ukraine. The clear implication of this book is that the author has taken the side of his Ukrainian sources on this issue, even though much of his evidence does not support it well".
[3]:508
Alexander Nove, while generally praising the book, noted: "That the majority of those who died in the famine were Ukrainian peasants is not in dispute. But did they die because they were peasants, or because they were Ukrainians? As Conquest himself points out, the largest number of victims proportionately
were in fact Kazakhs, and no one has attributed this to Stalin's anti-Kazakh views".
[3]:508
Later scholarship has been divided on the question as well. Marples states: "Hiroaki Kuromiya notes that those who examine the famine from a general Soviet perspective downplay any specific Ukrainian factor,
while specialists on Ukraine generally support the concept of a genocidal famine".[3]:508
Awards[edit]
The Harvest of Sorrow won Conquest the
Antonovych prize in 1987, and the
Shevchenko National Prize in 1994.
