Supreme Court will argue on the phone in real time about releasing Trump's taxes May 12-13.

Fogdog

Fogdog

Well-Known Member
father nature said:
I am offering you a personal apology. I went after you personally about your links. That is unacceptable. I have a deep loathing for people that post personal attacks on a forum because they disagree..disagree on a topic is fine but personal attacks makes you a scumbag...and that was me. We are on completely different sides of the isle but we're all entitled to our own opinion. Sorry...I came here for weed not for personal attacks....peace
Click to expand...
Shouldn't the law apply whether Democrat or Republican? The only reason this is a political issue is because Trump made it one.

I'll even extend a hand of bi-partisanship by assuring you that I want Trump to have a fair trial, just like I would for anyone else who committed fraud and violated campaign financing laws.
 
Fogdog

Fogdog

Well-Known Member
codster25 said:
Haha K ya stereotypical racist.
Click to expand...
By mischaracterizing what he said and then repeating the falsehood, you aren't doing any different than the "canuk" does in this forum.

However, Canuck is only considered a derogatory term in the US. AND, isn't a racist term in any way.

Your ignorance is on the level of white racists but I'm not saying you ARE a white racist. I'm just saying you seem as ignorant as one.
 
codster25

codster25

Well-Known Member
Fogdog said:
By mischaracterizing what he said and then repeating the falsehood, you aren't doing any different than the "canuk" does in this forum.

However, Canuck is only considered a derogatory term in the US. AND, isn't a racist term in any way.

Your ignorance is on the level of white racists but I'm not saying you ARE a white racist. I'm just saying you seem as ignorant as one.
Click to expand...
To each there own, still seems a little ironic if not hipocritical in my opinion considering we are speaking about the same person who reports this type of behavior.
 
S

spek9

Well-Known Member
father nature said:
I dont think ANYONE should have their tax returns made public. That is private information that should stay private. Everyone looks for the best way to save money on their taxes otherwise they;re an idiot.

Anyone who feels differently feel free to post YOUR tax return right here on this forum and we'll make it go viral....didn't think so. We are all entitled to privacy no matter what job you have
Click to expand...
When I pay taxes in the USA, I expect to be able to know exactly where those dollars are going. The sitting President of the USA is a known cheat and fraud, so why shouldn't I have access to see his financial records?

It's clear that his properties are earning due to him being in the seat he is, so why don't I have the right to ensure that he's not personally gaining?

When someone is in a position to direct the use of MY money, I deserve the right to know what that money is being spent on.

I know... it's hard to understand financial due diligence when you are un-or-underemployed and don't pay taxes, but I digress.
 
codster25

codster25

Well-Known Member
spek9 said:
When I pay taxes in the USA, I expect to be able to know exactly where those dollars are going. The sitting President of the USA is a known cheat and fraud, so why shouldn't I have access to see his financial records?

It's clear that his properties are earning due to him being in the seat he is, so why don't I have the right to ensure that he's not personally gaining?

When someone is in a position to direct the use of MY money, I deserve the right to know what that money is being spent on.

I know... it's hard to understand financial due diligence when you are un-or-underemployed and don't pay taxes, but I digress.
Click to expand...
careful when all else fails in defeating you In a debate, they will resort to calling you a spy, Russian bot etc.
 
Fogdog

Fogdog

Well-Known Member
codster25 said:
To each there own, still seems a little ironic if not hipocritical in my opinion considering we are speaking about the same person who reports this type of behavior.
Click to expand...
You don't understand what the word hypocritical means, much less how to spell it. It's not really a matter of "each there (sic) own" either (the word is their, not there, ignoramus). The fact is, Canuk is not a racial or racist term in any way. You can say or believe whatever you like but don't claim there are any facts behind your opinion.
 
codster25

codster25

Well-Known Member
Inn
Fogdog said:
You don't understand what the word hypocritical means, much less how to spell it. It's not really a matter of "each there (sic) own" either (the word is their, not there, ignoramus). The fact is, Canuk is not a racial or racist term in any way. You can say or believe whatever you like but don't claim there are any facts behind your opinion.
Click to expand...
I meant to each there own in regards to opinion and don’t care much about a spelling mistake as I type on my cellphone.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top