DIY-HP-LED
Well-Known Member
I think you need to explain that for us mere mortalsThat metric clearly shows the strict lockdown killing more people than the virus.
I think you need to explain that for us mere mortalsThat metric clearly shows the strict lockdown killing more people than the virus.
And you know this by the accurate testing carried out by the States? Try harder, I thought you were better.South Korea had a higher percentage of its population infected at its height than the US does now.
And you know this by the accurate testing carried out by the States? Try harder, I thought you were better.
As this article explains it...I think you need to explain that for us mere mortals
there were more than 8,000 non-coronavirus deaths reported within NYC from March 11-April 13. For comparison, the city health department confirmed there were 5,167 deaths during that same time span last year — meaning there would've been a sudden, nearly 66 percent spike in deaths unrelated to the pandemic year-over-year, which would be unheard of.
I shudder to think of how bad it would be without NYC lockdown....scarryAs this article explains it...
NYC Reports Thousands of Additional Deaths, City Toll Tops 10K Despite Signs of Hope
New York’s daily death toll surged back near 800 Tuesday, a day after falling below 700 for the first time in a week, while its coronavirus caseload surpassed 200,000, according to the state’s Department of Health. Still, Gov. Andrew Cuomo pointed to signs of optimism as total hospitalizations...www.nbcnewyork.com
Trump* is such a pussy for a King.Yeah poor trump......
Coronavirus: Trump retweets threat to fire Dr Fauci who said US response cost lives
Dr Anthony Fauci said fewer people would have died if Trump administration had announced isolation measures earlier
Trump retweets call to fire Fauci who said US virus response cost lives
It’s not clear whether retweet was a vague threat, but Donald Trump has fired several prominent public servants over the last few weeks.www.scmp.com
All It explains is that more people died of the virus than reported ....... possibly. You provide no proof just hypothesis that match your your thinking.... it sounding more like the gateway drug argument lol.As this article explains it...
NYC Reports Thousands of Additional Deaths, City Toll Tops 10K Despite Signs of Hope
New York’s daily death toll surged back near 800 Tuesday, a day after falling below 700 for the first time in a week, while its coronavirus caseload surpassed 200,000, according to the state’s Department of Health. Still, Gov. Andrew Cuomo pointed to signs of optimism as total hospitalizations...www.nbcnewyork.com
No.All It explains is that more people died of the virus than reported ....... possibly. You provide no proof just hypothesis that match your your thinking.... it sounding more like the gateway drug argument lol.
there were more than 8,000 non-coronavirus deaths reported within NYC from March 11-April 13. For comparison, the city health department confirmed there were 5,167 deaths during that same time span last year — meaning there would've been a sudden, nearly 66 percent spike in deaths unrelated to the pandemic year-over-year, which would be unheard of.
Where does it say the deaths were proven to be unrelated? FFS you are one stubborn SOB LOL.lol
66% spike in deaths unrelated to the pandemic year over year, which would be unheard of...
In the article you are having trouble reading. I even included a link to it. Please, no name calling. You accused me of doing this, which I hadn't, then you started calling names. It's uncouth.Where does it say the deaths were proven to be unrelated? FFS you are one stubborn SOB LOL.
Let me know if you still can't understand it.there were more than 8,000 non-coronavirus deaths reported within NYC from March 11-April 13. For comparison, the city health department confirmed there were 5,167 deaths during that same time span last year — meaning there would've been a sudden, nearly 66 percent spike in deaths unrelated to the pandemic year-over-year, which would be unheard of.
These things are not mutually exclusive. It actually strengthens my point overall.From your article
“may be wildly under-reporting the number of COVID-19 deaths.”
Nope it doesn’t lol.These things are not mutually exclusive. It actually strengthens my point overall.
Yes, it does. They're underestimating covid stats and you are clearly willing to question official tallies of deaths, yet you're quick to rebuke my questioning of the rationale when I except official stats.Nope it doesn’t lol.
Nope, I’m just questioning your saying it proves everything and I’m saying it proves nothing but carry on. Night RalphYes, it does. They're underestimating covid stats and you are clearly willing to question official tallies of deaths, yet you're quick to rebuke my questioning of the rationale when I except official stats.