that's why i love @bk78 for his superior troll game over King. king will make a post like i had a big mac for lunch today and bk will troll him with something like i bet the big mac tasted better under led lights. lol. RIU makes me laugh daily!Oh ya , same here. King has always been good to me, that dont mean i dont see through some of his threads/motives lol
I read his first post and seen where this was headed lol
Yeah I don't disagree with any of that. Just trying to offer a counter-point in regards to long term cost savings. When I finally upgrade my system I plan on a combo of LED and CMH.As I understand it, the problem of lumen drop off was initially caused by putting too much current through them, and most fixtures these days are set to run a bit below maximum to increase efficiency and lifespan.
As to having to get a new fixture, if you're buying the same level of quality light 5 1/2 years later, the price will have dropped. If you're buying a diy kit, you should be able to change the individual diodes yourself too, which would bring down the cost further. I read one thread where a guy refurbished a Chinese blurple with quality chips and it did great.
If you're using HID to grow weed you're not wrong, but refusing to admit that there are alternatives which could be just as good is close minded.
View attachment 4433752
if i had more space, a bare bulb 315 cmh hung vertically in between 4 plants and QBs that covered the whole ceiling. bam!Yeah I don't disagree with any of that. Just trying to offer a counter-point in regards to long term cost savings. When I finally upgrade my system I plan on a combo of LED and CMH.
Lots of guys are going that way. I've only seen one guy who had tried it say it sucked, and a bunch of others said it was great.Yeah I don't disagree with any of that. Just trying to offer a counter-point in regards to long term cost savings. When I finally upgrade my system I plan on a combo of LED and CMH.
that's why i love @bk78 for his superior troll game over King. king will make a post like i had a big mac for lunch today and bk will troll him with something like i bet the big mac tasted better under led lights. lol. RIU makes me laugh daily!
1 1k de puts out about the same ppfd as 4 x 315s....which puts out about the same ppfd is 2 x 600s as far as tested data goes. So not a bad comparison as far as it’s concerned. 2 680s, regardless of efficiency is closer to 1500 watts than it is to 1k, so you looking more like 1 x 1k and 1.5 x 315s which would put your output somewhere between 2400-3000umol. I don’t know how much light those 680s actually put out, but at the point you have that much light in that much space, the issue becomes more space than light. Gpw/sq’ is probably a better way to look at it imo, but watt for watt, in the hands of a capable grower, all the systems you described(if not comparing 1300 watts to 1500 because that’s an extra 200 watts which is an additional pound under the circumstance you described with those 680s.Green light penetrates the canopy. I never mention red and blue, or a blurple. Daylight spectrum 3000k to 3500k leds have plenty of green.The did grow on the space station with red and blue. Dont know why they didn't take a green one with um.ll You could check out The bc blonds 5.1 pound grow on youtube. Uses two 680 gamechangers. Slowly ramping up the lights going 50% power til week 3 then 75% til week 5. You want to do the math with the changes and tell me the grams per watt, and if you can match that with 2 600w or 4 315's?
Light is absorbed or turns to heat. Sort of why light efficiency/spectrum is important. 70% efficient means 30% is put out pretty much as just heat as far as I understand.Light is heat - the more light the hotter it gets.
Eventually those with leds realise their light dosent spread and saturate the room or tent which is why you need to compensate for a lesser environment.
You openly stated led destroys cmh - wasnt refering to heat though were you, 5.1 yeild, cmh hps cant do etc etc.
On point. Leds in cold climate can be shit for efficiency when you need to add a power heavy heater/hvac. Throw in a bunch of hids and your heat problem is solved by adding more light. Some like efficiency swaps here. Just because your light is efficient, doesn’t mean your room is.Ever grown in a cold basement?
I've said it many times, the best light is the one that best fits your situation.
Why hps do well with “shitty” spectrum = ppfd output. At this point, 1k still wins in amount of useable light put out, which translate to penetration additionally. I’m personally into the cmh/de combo, seems to do great in my space. That said, I also run leds.You cant handle the discussion, ive given answers - Start with why led spectrum makes hps spectrum look shit but yet hps does pretty darn well.... Explanations please??????
Its all good trolling and copy pasting led rubbish but if you ever hope to deal with higher discussion then you will address the stuff thats already at hand and not revert back to.led troll default.
Light is absorbed or turns to heat. Sort of why light efficiency/spectrum is important. 70% efficient means 30% is put out pretty much as just heat as far as I understand.
Why hps do well with “shitty” spectrum = ppfd output. At this point, 1k still wins in amount of useable light put out, which translate to penetration additionally. I’m personally into the cmh/de combo, seems to do great in my space. That said, I also run leds.
Leds are fine, but like any other light, they have pros AND cons. There is also such thing as too much light, and I’ve found if I’m over 1100umole, I have feeding problems and it’s much harder to keep the plants healthy. I’m into using whatever works though...so I have a lot of convos.Its easy to find on this thread and everyother - leds claim superior light everything and 30% bigger yeilds for same watts over hps
Leds are fine, but like any other light, they have pros AND cons. There is also such thing as too much light, and I’ve found if I’m over 1100umole, I have feeding problems and it’s much harder to keep the plants healthy. I’m into using whatever works though...so I have a lot of convos.
Grow consistency.You would expect hps to be dead by now as well but seems to be as strong as ever - wtf happened there?
Here's why we dont use hps much anymore.Well that was the purpose of the thread, im finding light levels for each stage and that most of the info and light charts have me too close at times and working in ppfd or umols gives me a better scale.
Leds are great lights, their history and attitude here let alone failings to discuss why that shitty hps spectrum they were meant to kill does so darn well less than reputable.
Some suggested i was inviting led argument... this just one in many environment threads where im trying to pin exact numbers down and ive done the same for wind speed recently amongst one or two other topics like temps. Ive seen research labs grow other plants using all this data and just wanted to get to that level and also work out the set for mj.
I see seedlings at 100-200umols but this is just taken from base info and leaves a 4x24w t5 unit let alone 250w hps pretty high above jusr to achieve such low level. So is this why seedlings can do so well in windows but bum out under lights.
I grow but i have so.much fine detail ahead
I do not want a dead even ppfd or spread. What i showed is how I like it for 2 reasons. 1) overlap would be higher then centerOn paper led rocks but in reality it cant match its paper data - is that a spectrum problem? Historically thats always been a stumbling block.
Im all for leds becomoling the best light but i just cant see it yet.
Personally its a non issue, i just hated how led posters hated on everyone else and thought there was a better way to co-exist.
Id also.like to see an even ppfd over the whole tent from leds, different voltages to each diode maybe idk but theres more they could push than just the basic models