Abolish private healthcare insurance

mooray

Well-Known Member
Zero, I'm not a framer. Wood and other sharp objects? I don't know, because I don't pay ten grand to get xrays and have someone else take them out.

Okay, I'm out for the night. Got better things to do than argue with the Arkansas division of the Antifa Fan Club.
 

PJ Diaz

Well-Known Member
Im surprised that PJ doesnt know how sole traders work and thinks that people who choose to work this way are somehow not as good or successful as those that are employees or have employees.
I do know how they work, and I know that it's not always legal just because they do it.

I don't think that as a universal statement. I do think that someone who calls themselves a building contractor should either hire real employees to drive nails for them, or acquire some skills in their industry which will help to keep them from nailing their own finger.
 

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member
Any of us that have done manual things for a living have had to pull stuff out. Post that in a framers forum and see what they say about ol' UncleMary over there.
You can ask the fellow framers I work with

one guy put in a nail into his leg, shattered the bone, now has a titanium rod there

another gotlucky when the nail went through his thumb joint instead of shattering the bones

another had a siding nail through the hand, another stapled his hand doing tyvek

you seem all bitter about me getting the best of you. Get over it
 
Last edited:

ChiefRunningPhist

Well-Known Member
Contractors bid on a job, some specifics which may be inherent in the contract that they negotiate, but outside of that they don't get told how to do the job they've won the bid for.

In that case you're asking about we were hiring various types of stagehands, from scenic carpenters who brought their own tools, to "freelance" audio engineers. The problem is that these workers were given specific tasks, assignments, and working hours they were required to comply with. Therefore the IRS deemed they should have been employees. I don't know if the company ever got fined for it, as it was actually a governmental entity, and that part of the bureaucracy was outside of my pay class.
Fair enough, I disagree.


Here's some common jobs legally taxed as independent contractors...
 

PJ Diaz

Well-Known Member
this thread is for pj to get embarrassed
It is? LOL, I'm not the idiot who nailed my own finger because my business isn't successful to hire someone to do the dangerous work for me.

I made a clear decision over 10 years ago to not do anything work related as an independent contractor that is too dangerous.

I'm an independent contractor when I rent my gear out, but I'm an employee (covered by worker's comp) when I run that gear for clients.

It's awesome when I get paid union wages to run my own gear which I rented to the end client.
 

Lucky Luke

Well-Known Member
I do know how they work, and I know that it's not always legal just because they do it.

I don't think that as a universal statement. I do think that someone who calls themselves a building contractor should either hire real employees to drive nails for them, or acquire some skills in their industry which will help to keep them from nailing their own finger.
Why would anyone want employees for? I certainly dont, The more employees the more work you need to do. Plus more headache and paperwork.
You seem to be fixated on this "you have to hire people" thing to be legitimate...
 

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member
It is? LOL, I'm not the idiot who nailed my own finger because my business isn't successful to hire someone to do the dangerous work for me.

I made a clear decision over 10 years ago to not do anything work related as an independent contractor that is too dangerous.

I'm an independent contractor when I rent my gear out, but I'm an employee (covered by worker's comp) when I run that gear for clients.

It's awesome when I get paid union wages to run my own gear which I rented to the end client.
Fraudy McFraudster, you’ll be hard pressed to find any f who hasn’t shot themselves with a nail

mans no one buys that you have a business when you’ve already proven you don’t know how fica or workman’s comp work

just give up already
 

PJ Diaz

Well-Known Member
Some on that list are true independent contractors. Others could be independent contractors, depending on the specifics.

One job in your list that could go either way, depending on the specifics in Security Guard. If you get a contract as a Security Guard to keep a specific business secure, but you get to decide how you will do that, and what hours you will work to make the building secure, up to your client's standards, then yes it's an independent contractor. Conversely, if you're hired by a night club as a security guard, told when to show up, told how to engage with patrons, and not allowed to leave until you are released, then you should be considered an employee. If a business chooses to engage a worker in the second type of example, that would be illegal employment. Issuing a worker a 1099 in that case would be an IRS violation, as well as a Dept of Labor violation (though they don't really police such things unless a worker files a claim).
 

PJ Diaz

Well-Known Member
Why would anyone want employees for? I certainly dont, The more employees the more work you need to do. Plus more headache and paperwork.
You seem to be fixated on this "you have to hire people" thing to be legitimate...
This is exactly the point. You don't want legit employees because they cost more, so you call them independent contractors. You are in Aus as I recal, so I assume the laws may be different there. Here in the US we have laws to protect workers from this sort of abuse. It's pretty clear from the statements in this thread that most don't really understand the thin line that distinguishes the two.

The fact is that because this was been a widespread problem for years, exasperated recently by app based drivers (Uber, etc), California has recently passed a law (AB5) to further clarify the distinction between employees and independent contractors. Here is the text of the assembly bill itself:

 

Lucky Luke

Well-Known Member
This is exactly the point. You don't want legit employees because they cost more, so you call them independent contractors. You are in Aus as I recal, so I assume the laws may be different there. Here in the US we have laws to protect workers from this sort of abuse. It's pretty clear from the statements in this thread that most don't really understand the thin line that distinguishes the two.

The fact is that because this was been a widespread problem for years, exasperated recently by app based drivers (Uber, etc), California has recently passed a law (AB5) to further clarify the distinction between employees and independent contractors. Here is the text of the assembly bill itself:

No..i dont hire anyone to work with me or on a job. Employee or contractor. Its just me. Im a Sole Trader. an Independent contractor.
I dont get why u find it so hard to understand.
 

PJ Diaz

Well-Known Member
you’ve already proven you don’t know how fica or workman’s comp work

just give up already
You haven't proven anything of the sort. I've understood this distinction for decades. Lucky for me, I've never nailed my own finger however.
 

PJ Diaz

Well-Known Member
No..i dont hire anyone to work with me or on a job. Employee or contractor. Its just me. Im a Sole Trader. an Independent contractor.
I dont get why u find it so hard to understand.
Why is it hard for you to understand that to be an independent contractor in the US you legally have to fulfill a preponderance of criteria set forth by the IRS, and that many so-called "independent contractors" do not fulfill that set of criteria? In California, where I'm at there are even more stringent requirements than on the federal level. It's likely much different in Australia.
 

Lucky Luke

Well-Known Member
Why is it hard for you to understand that to be an independent contractor in the US you legally have to fulfill a preponderance of criteria set forth by the IRS, and that many so-called "independent contractors" do not fulfill that set of criteria? In California, where I'm at there are even more stringent requirements than on the federal level. It's likely much different in Australia.
Changing the subject again i see.
 

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member
You haven't proven anything of the sort. I've understood this distinction for decades. Lucky for me, I've never nailed my own finger however.
You literally had no idea how fica or workman’s comp worked

congrats on looking it up though I guess, fraudy McFraudster
 

Lucky Luke

Well-Known Member
For anyone reading this thread and have thought about being a Sole trader (independent contractor) dont listen to PJ.

You dont have to hire or subcontract people to work with you to be successful. In fact you can work less hours and make more money than being an employee in allot of cases. You set how much you want to earn. Tax system supports you as well. Its a great life.
You dont have to be dodgy like PJ suggest and anyone who is dodgy certainly isnt getting the hrly rates that a good reputation pays.
You are the salesman, the book keeper, receptionist and the shit kicker. Buck stops with you and no one is your boss.
 

PJ Diaz

Well-Known Member
You literally had no idea how fica or workman’s comp worked
Your making a statement does not make it true, and repeating it over and over does not make it any truer.

Sorry, I made a mistake thinking that you are an illegitimate day laborer, which is why I mentioned worker's comp and tax dodging. It was an apparently incorrect assumption I made when I saw that you had such low level skills using power tools. It's also very common in your industry. That fact that you attempt to avoid that fact just shows that you are not being completely truthful.
 
Top