Wouldn't it be ironic if a bunch of armed cracker Trump secessionists led to a real and permanent assault weapons ban?

blu3bird

blu3bird

Well-Known Member
Rob Roy said:
Any form of "gun control" which is enforced by armed agents of the state is ironic.

If guns are outlawed, what's left of free speech, will become extinct too.
Click to expand...
I'm pretty sure only assault rifles is what they want to restrict/outlaw

You can keep your shotgun or hunting rifles and still have free speech

I don't know about you, but I don't need an assault rifle to speak freely
 
Rob Roy

Rob Roy

Well-Known Member
blu3bird said:
I'm pretty sure only assault rifles is what they want to restrict/outlaw

You can keep your shotgun or hunting rifles and still have free speech

I don't know about you, but I don't need an assault rifle to speak freely
Click to expand...
What is an "assault rifle" ?

Why is the restriction of them, using soldiers / militarized police armed with "assault rifles" to effectuate it, not ironic?

You have a "guard dog", a nice medium sized docile old animal. I have 4 vicious well trained 200 pound face ripping guard dogs. I tell you to shut up, will your dog protect you against my dogs ? Your dog will be torn apart like a stuffed animal. That is how you will you loose free speech. Now go lie down!

1571914585088.png
 
blu3bird

blu3bird

Well-Known Member
Rob Roy said:
What is an "assault rifle" ?

Why is the restriction of them, using soldiers / militarized police armed with "assault rifles" to effectuate it, not ironic?

You have a "guard dog", a nice medium sized docile old animal. I have 4 vicious well trained 200 pound face ripping guard dogs. I tell you to shut up, will your dog protect you against my dogs ? Your dog will be torn apart like a stuffed animal. That is how you will you loose free speech. Now go lie down!

View attachment 4412076
Click to expand...
You're smart enough to know what an assault rifle is, Rob. Let's not split hairs over that

Freedom of speech is a right, I know you'll agree with that

Rights come with responsibilities, I don't know if you agree with that, it's just the way it is though

So if I speak freely and responsibly, why would you tell me to shut up and have your dogs attack me?

If I don't exercise responsibility with my speech, I can understand being attacked
 
Rob Roy

Rob Roy

Well-Known Member
blu3bird said:
You're smart enough to know what an assault rifle is, Rob. Let's not split hairs over that

Freedom of speech is a right, I know you'll agree with that

Rights come with responsibilities, I don't know if you agree with that, it's just the way it is though

So if I speak freely and responsibly, why would you tell me to shut up and have your dogs attack me?

If I don't exercise responsibility with my speech, I can understand being attacked
Click to expand...
That's just it, I wouldn't attack you. My example was an example, meant for you to extrapolate.

Apparently you are okay with some people having assault rifles and following thru with threatening to attack anybody that isn't designated as privileged to have an assault rifle though.

If some people are "allowed" to have something that you aren't allowed to have, you don't have the same rights. If you don't have the same ability to defend your rights as the people trying to strip you of your rights....you will lose other rights. It's not a possibility....it's an inevitability.
 
kgp

kgp

Well-Known Member
Never gonna happen. They tried it once. Good thing we still have folks in congress that love the constitution more than sensitive snow flakes that are more likely to get hit by a car then get shot with an "assault rifle". Which is not an assault rifle at all. Its a semi auto just like most other guns. Assault rifle is defined as any gun with a selector switch. Coming from a cracker who knows what hes talking about.
 
Justin-case

Justin-case

Well-Known Member
kgp said:
Never gonna happen. They tried it once. Good thing we still have folks in congress that love the constitution more than sensitive snow flakes that are more likely to get hit by a car then get shot with an "assault rifle". Which is not an assault rifle at all. Its a semi auto just like most other guns. Assault rifle is defined as any gun with a selector switch. Coming from a cracker who knows what hes talking about.
Click to expand...
AR-15' stands for assault rifle fifteen
 
kgp

kgp

Well-Known Member
Justin-case said:
That was just the first one, the rest stand for assault rifle fifteen. Might as well stand for kid killer fifteen, because that's what the violent right uses them for.
Click to expand...
There are 5 to 10 million in america. If you do the math, 173 mass shooting deaths caused by ar15's in a decade. Lets go low and say 5 million, thats a 0.0000346 % chance an ar15 will be used to kill anyone, even lower if your talking about kids, and if you deduct the suicide rates its way less.

1700 people were murdered with knives or sharp object in the same time frame. If no one was ever murdered by a knife again, it would take 100 years for ar15's to catch up to the amount of deaths caused by knives.

327 million people in the USA, so basically you will have better odds of being struck by lighting. 490 people got struck by lighting in 10 years.
 
Last edited:
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top