Occasio Cortez, New Green Deal visionary?

Unclebaldrick

Unclebaldrick

Well-Known Member
Bugeye said:
And it was given out to NPR and other news outlets in a different format. So now it looks like she said it or her team is beyond incompetent.
Click to expand...
Even if it was, it doesn't make them incompetent. I don't think you are quite informed enough to realize how far the idiot Trump has lowered that bar. Politically naive, but not incompetent.
 
Fogdog

Fogdog

Well-Known Member
Bugeye said:
She was hacked! LOL
Click to expand...
Does not pass the sniff test.

Do you really think she'd say "Economic security for people who are unwilling to work?" In a FAQ about her resolution that does not say anything about it?

I get that you'd like to think she's dumb. Most old men tend to dismiss young attractive women as dumb. But really, she didn't beat one of the more powerful Democrats in the House by being dumb and lucky. That's what your propaganda machine is churning out.

So, thanks for the laugh nazi boi.

 
Bugeye

Bugeye

Well-Known Member
Fogdog said:
Does not pass the sniff test.

Do you really think she'd say "Economic security for people who are unwilling to work?" In a FAQ about her resolution that does not say anything about it?

I get that you'd like to think she's dumb. Most old men tend to dismiss young attractive women as dumb. But really, she didn't beat one of the more powerful Democrats in the House by being dumb and lucky. That's what your propaganda machine is churning out.

So, thanks for the laugh nazi boi.

Click to expand...
OK, maybe NPR is fake news. Hold onto that thought! Never let it die! We don't want your precious ego to hurt. LOL
 
Fogdog

Fogdog

Well-Known Member
Bugeye said:
OK, maybe NPR is fake news. Hold onto that thought! Never let it die! LOL
Click to expand...
I never said that. I even said that NPR got it wrong when they said carbon neutral in ten years. The final draft submitted to Congress said 30 years, which is still a tall order. They posted that document on their site and should have known better.

You, on the other hand keep making me laugh. Along with everybody else.

 
Bugeye

Bugeye

Well-Known Member
Fogdog said:
I never said that. I even said that NPR got it wrong when they said carbon neutral in ten years. The final draft submitted to Congress said 30 years, which is still a tall order. They posted that document on their site and should have known better.

You, on the other hand keep making me laugh. Along with everybody else.

Click to expand...
Oh, you're right Fogdog, I just made that stuff up out of the clear blue and just got lucky by finding numerous sources that also made up the same crazy shit that I did. Nothing fucked up about you!
 
Fogdog

Fogdog

Well-Known Member
Bugeye said:
Oh, you're right Fogdog, I just made that stuff up out of the clear blue and just got lucky by finding numerous sources that also made up the same crazy shit that I did. Nothing fucked up about you!
Click to expand...
You should try reading a post before making shit up. I gave you a link to the specific document that was submitted to Congress but you just kept flailing about posting stuff from everything but.

I even warned you that if you didn't post from that exact document you'd be laughed at.

Your melt down was spectacular when I started laughing at you. And now everybody is.
 
Bugeye

Bugeye

Well-Known Member
Fogdog said:
You made shit up about the ten years. You have no credibility to lean on, you have to prove what you said is true. I went through the resolution and find no reference to "provide for able people unwilling to work" anywhere or in any form. Where does it say that in Cortez's resolution that the New Green Deal? Cite the page and paragraph number on that page where it says anything remotely like that in this document:

https://apps.npr.org/documents/document.html?id=5731829-Ocasio-Cortez-Green-New-Deal-Resolution

You like to talk in circular logic. Another logical fallacy that I guess you think is clever but actually proves you wrong. Any response other than a cited page number and paragraph number on that page that says something like what you claim will be laughed at.

Because liars lie.
Click to expand...
Uh, I didn't make anything up and asking me to reference a document that has now been stripped of the details I spoke to is kind of pathetic.
 
Unclebaldrick

Unclebaldrick

Well-Known Member
Fogdog said:
You should try reading a post before making shit up. I gave you a link to the specific document that was submitted to Congress but you just kept flailing about posting stuff from everything but.

I even warned you that if you didn't post from that exact document you'd be laughed at.

Your melt down was spectacular when I started laughing at you. And now everybody is.
Click to expand...
Frankly, I find him far too dumb to be really funny. It is more of a sad, condescending laugh.

 
Fogdog

Fogdog

Well-Known Member
Unclebaldrick said:
Frankly, I find him far too dumb to be really funny. It is more of a sad, condescending laugh.

Click to expand...
Each to their own. I'm at the laugh out loud stage with him. He can't admit he was wrong and so keeps digging in deeper. You know what they say about "when you realize you are digging yourself into a hole. First, is stop digging."

LOL
 
Bugeye

Bugeye

Well-Known Member
Fogdog said:
Each to their own. I'm at the laugh out loud stage with him. He can't admit he was wrong and so keeps digging in deeper. You know what they say about "when you realize you are digging yourself into a hole. First, is stop digging."

LOL
Click to expand...
Wow, is your timing off tonight or what?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top