is this the middle ages?

[Rob Roy]

actually the female was saying NO !!!!! Don't !!!!! STOP !!!!!!
That sir is called rape. So now you are a rapist as well ?

It was a hypothetical story, embellish as you wish, but please don't masturbate furiously to images in your mind of me, I'd feel a little dirty if you did that again.

 

[UncleBuck]

It was a hypothetical story, embellish as you wish, but please don't masturbate furiously to images in your mind of me, I'd feel a little dirty if you did that again.

I remember you once told a “hypothetical” story about paying children for sex except you called that exchange consensual

 

[londonfog]

It was a hypothetical story, embellish as you wish, but please don't masturbate furiously to images in your mind of me, I'd feel a little dirty if you did that again.

Well please keep your hypothetical rape stories to yourself. Bad enough we have to deal with you being molested as a child, now you think it is normal

 

[londonfog]

I remember you once told a “hypothetical” story about paying children for sex except you called that exchange consensual

I still remember when his argument was some 12 year olds are mature for their age

 

[Rob Roy]

OMG
House is not open to the public
Store is open to public.
You can't be this stupid

So you're not rebutting that in both cases the property is owned by one party ?

You're not rebutting that a characteristic of property is the owner decides what to do with it ?



No, I'm not that stupid. You're barking up the wrong tree again and straw manning the argument. Try to stay with it. I know it's hard, well in your case maybe it's soft, but you know what I mean.

 

[Rob Roy]

Well please keep your hypothetical rape stories to yourself. Bad enough we have to deal with you being molested as a child, now you think it is normal

You thought about my muscular sweaty hairy ass didn't you? I knew it.

 

[londonfog]

So you're not rebutting that in both cases the property is owned by one party ?

You're not rebutting that a characteristic of property is the owner decides what to do with it ?
No one


No, I'm not that stupid. You're barking up the wrong tree again and straw manning the argument. Try to stay with it. I know it's hard, well in your case maybe it's soft, but you know what I mean.

and one property is open to the public.
the other is not.
I have a home.
I have a cleaners and laundromats.
No customer washes or drops clothes off at my home.

 

[londonfog]

You thought about my muscular sweaty hairy ass didn't you? I knew it.

Naw I was thinking of your beautiful sweet mother and the pain she must go through knowing she has a son like yourself

 

[Rob Roy]

Do you honestly think the same rules apply to a house as they do to a store you stupid racist bitch?

When you say rules, what do you mean? Do you mean the things that people who don't own your property have decided you'll do with your own property as if they owned it ?

Are you saying you'd be fine if I came to your property and started making rules about how you'd use it ?

Okay let's play that game.

Rob Roy - Hey Uncle Buck !!!

Uncle Buck - What you @#$%&!!! racist pedo !!???

Rob Roy - New rule, you gotta clean your bathroom better, c'mon man.

 

[Rob Roy]

and one property is open to the public.
the other is not.
I have a home.
I have a cleaners and laundromats.
No customer washes or drops clothes off at my home.

So in both cases who is the owner, you or somebody else ?

 

[Rob Roy]

Naw I was thinging of your beautiful sweet mother and the pain she must go through knowing she has a son like yourself

Stop it, you're gonna make me cry.

 

[UncleBuck]

So you're not rebutting that in both cases the property is owned by one party ?

You're not rebutting that a characteristic of property is the owner decides what to do with it ?



No, I'm not that stupid. You're barking up the wrong tree again and straw manning the argument. Try to stay with it. I know it's hard, well in your case maybe it's soft, but you know what I mean.

A store and a house are both property but in one case the owner wants people to come in and buy stuff

Unless of course the owner is you and the shopper is black

 

[londonfog]

Stop it, you're gonna make me cry.

Well try to be a better man and son

 

[UncleBuck]

So in both cases who is the owner, you or somebody else ?

In one case the owner wants people to come in and buy stuff

 

[londonfog]

So in both cases who is the owner, you or somebody else ?

what is your point

 

[Rob Roy]

A store and a house are both property but in one case the owner wants people to come in and buy stuff

Unless of course the owner is you and the shopper is black

Your last sentence is inaccurate and your first sentence leaves out relevant information.

In the store scenario, if a person wants to discriminate, they want SOME people to come in, but not others. Sometimes I pity your painful attempts to make an argument.

 

[UncleBuck]

Your last sentence is inaccurate and your first sentence leave out relevant information.

In the store scenario, if a person wants to discriminate, they want SOME people to come in, but not others.

You left out that you want to discriminate and kick people out because they’re black

 

[Rob Roy]

what is your point

My point is you can't force an unwilling neutral person to use his property as you wish and against his wishes and be having a serious conversation about applying "equal rights",

Violating a persons property right is in opposition to respect for another persons rights.

Therefore, what you are arguing isn't respect for another persons rights, you are arguing for ways you find acceptable to violate them.

 

[londonfog]

You left out that you want to discriminate and kick people out because they’re black

Has he ever told you how you POLITELY request for blacks not to come in a store.

 

[londonfog]

My point is you can't force an unwilling neutral person to use his property as you wish and against his wishes and be having a serious conversation about applying "equal rights",

Violating a persons property right is in opposition to respect for another persons rights.

Therefore, what you are arguing isn't respect for another persons rights, you are arguing for ways you find acceptable to violate them.

how are you being violated Rob Roy. Who is abusing you.