is this the middle ages?

londonfog

londonfog

Well-Known Member
Rob Roy said:
Non sequitur. I can't "support" or not support whether another person is capable of consenting to something or whether they do consent to something or not.

Other people either can or cannot consent, other people either do or do not consent, consent is individual and is affixed to them and their ability and choice to consent is independent of me and other people.


.
Click to expand...
If you knew your neighbor was fucking under age children, you would do what...NOTHING as you once said.
 
Grandpapy

Grandpapy

Well-Known Member
Rob Roy said:
Non sequitur. I can't "support" or not support whether another person is capable of consenting to something or whether they do consent to something or not.

Other people either can or cannot consent, other people either do or do not consent, consent is individual and is affixed to them and their ability and choice to consent is independent of me and other people.
Click to expand...
Yes you can. Just tell them you live in Canada.

Welcome to the land where a new 'slapping law' means beating your partner is no longer a criminal offense.
https://www.bbc.co.uk/bbcthree/article/0dd0ab91-145a-4137-bf87-28d0498c8d56

If your Boyfriend/Girlfriend is beating you, get him to bring down here for a beating, we'll protect you and prosecute him.

It's ok to come out of the shadows.
 
Rob Roy

Rob Roy

Well-Known Member
londonfog said:
If you knew your neighbor was fucking under age children, you would do what...NOTHING as you once said.
Click to expand...
Except, my neighbor is dead now. That's another story for another time though.

Can you define what you mean when you say "underage children" ?
 
Rob Roy

Rob Roy

Well-Known Member
Grandpapy said:
Yes you can. Just tell them you live in Canada.

Welcome to the land where a new 'slapping law' means beating your partner is no longer a criminal offense.
https://www.bbc.co.uk/bbcthree/article/0dd0ab91-145a-4137-bf87-28d0498c8d56

If your Boyfriend/Girlfriend is beating you, get him to bring down here for a beating, we'll protect you and prosecute him.

It's ok to come out of the shadows.
Click to expand...

If you allow a government to define what is and isn't "criminal behavior" you'll find some things that are legal but are real crimes, and some things which are illegal and not crimes at all.

It's okay to come out of the shadows and admit that governments aren't based in anything approaching rationality.


“The real hopeless victims of mental illness are to be found among those who appear to be most normal. “Many of them are normal because they are so well adjusted to our mode of existence, because their human voice has been silenced so early in their lives, that they do not even struggle or suffer or develop symptoms as the neurotic does.” They are normal not in what may be called the absolute sense of the word; they are normal only in relation to a profoundly abnormal society. Their perfect adjustment to that abnormal society is a measure of their mental sickness. These millions of abnormally normal people, living without fuss in a society to which, if they were fully human beings, they ought not to be adjusted.” ― Aldous Huxley, Brave New World Revisited
 
Rob Roy

Rob Roy

Well-Known Member
tangerinegreen555 said:
A classic Rob Roy Moore question.
Click to expand...
So you don't think it's a good idea to seek clarity / definition when a person makes an assertion ?

In this case, "underage" is a legal variable depending on which plantation the persons involved are in. Also, there seems to be some contention what "consent" means and how it is actually provided and who can provide it, under which circumstances etc.

I know that you will consider my concerns and respond with an on point definition of what you feel underage is and why.
 
tangerinegreen555

tangerinegreen555

Well-Known Member
Rob Roy said:
So you don't think it's a good idea to seek clarity / definition when a person makes an assertion ?

In this case, "underage" is a legal variable depending on which plantation the persons involved are in. Also, there seems to be some contention what "consent" means and how it is actually provided and who can provide it, under which circumstances etc.

I know that you will consider my concerns and respond with an on point definition of what you feel underage is and why.
Click to expand...
What fucking year is it? 1820?
 
Rob Roy

Rob Roy

Well-Known Member
londonfog said:
You were underage when you were molested as a child. I suggest you check your laws in your state, but at your age I would leave anything under AARP qualified alone.
Click to expand...

My point was, you used a term, "underage" which is variable depending on location / legal jurisdiction. It's entirely appropriate on my part to get clarity from you as to your meaning, isn't it? If you are going to make statements and then run from defining what you meant, it's not conducive to an amicable discussion or debate.

Your flippant reply and the preceding remarks from the various hyaenas in the posts above shows a lack of sincerity in pursuing the topic on an intellectual basis, rather, it seems the hyaenas are simply interested in making unfounded base accusations. When people do that, it often means they are ill equipped to argue their point and instead resort to innuendo and ad hominin attacks. Which of course is a poor reflection on them. Tsk Tsk.

Now, lets examine your post. You said I was underage when I was molested. That's just a variation of "do you still beat your wife" ?

Not bad, but you could have been more subtle and built up to it. Or been more original, here let me demonstrate, " hey London, so sorry to hear your childrens DNA came back indicating you couldn't possibly be their father..." See, how it grabs the reader, but also offers opportunity to expand the conversation?
 
UncleBuck

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member
Rob Roy said:
My point was, you used a term, "underage" which is variable depending on location / legal jurisdiction. It's entirely appropriate on my part to get clarity from you as to your meaning, isn't it? If you are going to make statements and then run from defining what you meant, it's not conducive to an amicable discussion or debate.

Your flippant reply and the preceding remarks from the various hyaenas in the posts above shows a lack of sincerity in pursuing the topic on an intellectual basis, rather, it seems the hyaenas are simply interested in making unfounded base accusations. When people do that, it often means they are ill equipped to argue their point and instead resort to innuendo and ad hominin attacks. Which of course is a poor reflection on them. Tsk Tsk.

Now, lets examine your post. You said I was underage when I was molested. That's just a variation of "do you still beat your wife" ?

Not bad, but you could have been more subtle and built up to it. Or been more original, here let me demonstrate, " hey London, so sorry to hear your childrens DNA came back indicating you couldn't possibly be their father..." See, how it grabs the reader, but also offers opportunity to expand the conversation?
Click to expand...
P
E
D
O
P
H
I
L
E
 
londonfog

londonfog

Well-Known Member
Rob Roy said:
My point was, you used a term, "underage" which is variable depending on location / legal jurisdiction. It's entirely appropriate on my part to get clarity from you as to your meaning, isn't it? If you are going to make statements and then run from defining what you meant, it's not conducive to an amicable discussion or debate.

Your flippant reply and the preceding remarks from the various hyaenas in the posts above shows a lack of sincerity in pursuing the topic on an intellectual basis, rather, it seems the hyaenas are simply interested in making unfounded base accusations. When people do that, it often means they are ill equipped to argue their point and instead resort to innuendo and ad hominin attacks. Which of course is a poor reflection on them. Tsk Tsk.

Now, lets examine your post. You said I was underage when I was molested. That's just a variation of "do you still beat your wife" ?

Not bad, but you could have been more subtle and built up to it. Or been more original, here let me demonstrate, " hey London, so sorry to hear your childrens DNA came back indicating you couldn't possibly be their father..." See, how it grabs the reader, but also offers opportunity to expand the conversation?
Click to expand...
You claimed to have been molested at 12 by an older person. I have always asked do you think 12 is old enough to consent to sex with an adult. I say not and hell no.
You have said that some 12 year olds are more mature than others. I still say not and hell no
The child cannot consent and the adult should be put in jail. Why do you argue that 12 is too young...and why do you feel you need someone to tell you the lowest age you can fuck a girl. You are a sicko
 
Budley Doright

Budley Doright

Well-Known Member
londonfog said:
You claimed to have been molested at 12 by an older person. I have always asked do you think 12 is old enough to consent to sex with an adult. I say not and hell no.
You have said that some 12 year olds are more mature than others. I still say not and hell no
The child cannot consent and the adult should be put in jail. Why do you argue that 12 is too young...and why do you feel you need someone to tell you the lowest age you can fuck a girl. You are a sicko
Click to expand...
Again it’s a fools folly to engage. His assertion that the age of consent is a variable depending on the country/social edict is correct but that does not make it right or acceptable in this or your country. We have, by virtue of living here, agreed to a virtual contract to abide by the laws of this/your country. Don’t have to agree but you sure have to abide by them or face, yes forced compliance. This, by the nature of the social contract of being a citizen is not forced upon you, as you are free to seek change, or find a location that is more fitting to your needs like fucking a 12 year old. I will not engage with him as he will not, in a coherent way, explain the workings of his vision, just keeps spouting slavery shit. Here’s a senario for the readers. 12 year old, mature for her/his age comes to you and says “dad, Rob next door says it’s ok to let him touch me because it feels really nice, I agree so he now touches me a lot.” Rob’s response if he is true to his convictions says “well that’s great hon, as long as you agree to it, I’m down with that”. Does this all sound like a perfect world of free choice and the end of a forced to comply, utopian world? No, it sounds like a world where I would put a bullet in Robs brain and feel really good about doing it, and yes I would spend a good part of the rest of my life forcefully incarcerated, still feeling good about it.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top