How do these Social based countries keep doing it?

Rob Roy said:
So an armed person in Australia, who left people alone, but refused to "give up his guns" and comply with an arrest, would not be killed by Australian police ?

If you don't have a death penalty why are your police armed ? Why does Australia have a military ?
Click to expand...

They gave them up because it was a logical thing to do. Comparing anywhere and the USA is futile.
 
On another note why are some Americans so scared that they need a gun for protection? Protection from what? Most end up shooting themselves with it...
Are people that afraid to sleep in their own home or walk down their street thinking some bogey man is going to come get them?

I shoot from time to time and have done since I was a kid but a gun has never made me feel safer. Are Aussie just more confident or is it education or? Is it our social beliefs?
 
Lucky Luke said:
On another note why are some Americans so scared that they need a gun for protection? Protection from what? Most end up shooting themselves with it...
Are people that afraid to sleep in their own home or walk down their street thinking some bogey man is going to come get them?

I shoot from time to time and have done since I was a kid but a gun has never made me feel safer. Are Aussie just more confident or is it education or? Is it our social beliefs?
Click to expand...
LOL IT is a societal difference. Because we do not get it either.
 
Buddha2525 said:
Not all of us are brainwashed into believing liberal gun banning politicians do so for your own good, Lizzie Borden.
Click to expand...
Speaking of being brainwashed into believing, tell us more about this Jewish supremacism you and klan leader David duke believe in
 
Lucky Luke said:
what banning? I thought we covered that already....

Im off to do some work..have a great day all.
Click to expand...

That wasn't to you, it was to Lizzie Borden who believes everyone should own an axe to chop up evil doers, and only the police state is qualified as being moral enough to even look at a gun.
 
Lucky Luke said:
On another note why are some Americans so scared that they need a gun for protection? Protection from what? Most end up shooting themselves with it...
Are people that afraid to sleep in their own home or walk down their street thinking some bogey man is going to come get them?

I shoot from time to time and have done since I was a kid but a gun has never made me feel safer. Are Aussie just more confident or is it education or? Is it our social beliefs?
Click to expand...
American gun ownership is correlated with racism
 
Buddha2525 said:
That seems to me like a ban. Because I'm against guns being used for anything but personal protection. So if I were to try to obtain a gun they'd prevent me gun ownership on the basis of their draconian "non-gun ban" gun banning legislation for the real use of a gun.
Click to expand...
Are you cool with Trump threatening to shoot rock throwing refugees seeking asylum at the border?

"We used to have rocks thrown at us all the time in Afghanistan, but firing back was a fucking war crime." - USMC Corp.
 
scumrot derelict said:
Are you cool with Trump threatening to shoot rock throwing refugees seeking asylum at the border?

"We used to have rocks thrown at us all the time in Afghanistan, but firing back was a fucking war crime." - USMC Corp.
Click to expand...

Buddhists don't throw rocks to get their message across.

blog2.jpg
 
Lucky Luke said:
They are armed with Tasers, batons, pepper spray (?) and a side arm in case they are threatened or attacked by deadly force or to stop someone using deadly force.
Its the courts job to pass sentence not law enforcement.

The military? LOL
Click to expand...

So, if a person who isn't granted permission to be armed, remains armed, but they behave peacefully if they aren't attacked, the armed police will leave them alone and let them keep their weapons ?
 
Rob Roy said:
So, if a person who isn't granted permission to be armed, remains armed, but they behave peacefully if they aren't attacked, the armed police will leave them alone and let them keep their weapons ?
Click to expand...
Can you even give an example of a person not granted permission to be armed ? People are not granted permission. They lose their rights to bare arms. Big difference my weirdo hypocrite moocher
Do you wish a person who rapes a child of 12 years old to have a firearm ?
 
Rob Roy said:
So, if a person who isn't granted permission to be armed, remains armed, but they behave peacefully if they aren't attacked, the armed police will leave them alone and let them keep their weapons ?
Click to expand...
No they would be questioned or even arrested and have their gun confiscated. Its not that hard to understand.

Why would you want a person roaming around armed for? I'd want them Questioned and action taken. We don't want the huge amount of mass shootings America gets.
 
londonfog said:
Can you even give an example of a person not granted permission to be armed ? People are not granted permission. They lose their rights to bare arms. Big difference my weirdo hypocrite moocher
Do you wish a person who rapes a child of 12 years old to have a firearm ?
Click to expand...



bear-arms.jpg
 
Lucky Luke said:
No they would be questioned or even arrested and have their gun confiscated. Its not that hard to understand.

Why would you want a person roaming around armed for? I'd want them Questioned and action taken. We don't want the huge amount of mass shootings America gets.
Click to expand...

So if a person who is behaving peacefully has weapons, and another person with a badge comes to them and threatens them...who is the aggressor ?

If the peaceful, but civilly disobedient person refused to give up his weapons, would your police shoot them?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top