Aussie Growers Thread

yummy fur

Well-Known Member
yep same crappy ones i use. just dont get any water around the top and it will last for ages. thats the biggest difference witht the expensive ones. all the extra effort that goes into making them waterproof etc.
Ha, I dropped mine in the tank a few days ago, I whipped it out pretty quickly. It survived this!
 

giglewigle

Well-Known Member
Storage. Always keep your pH electrode moist. ... If 4 M KCl is not available, use a pH 4 or 7 buffer solution. DO NOT store electrode in distilled or deionized water—this will cause ions to leach out of the glass bulb and render your electrode useless.

https://www.coleparmer.com/tech-article/ph-electrode-care
I have left my cap of a few times over night I don’t get it so many things like this don’t seem to work for me like mole had a plant out side the tent that was covered in pm n I never got rid of it cuse I kept getting a case of the fuck it’s plants in the tent where fine I don’t no how my grow space don’t just spontaneously combust lol it’s cool that it’s so many things work n some don’t for doff people
 

yummy fur

Well-Known Member
I have left my cap of a few times over night
Who hasn't done that, or left the battery on, the cheap ones don't turn off. Putting in back in a glass with some buffer means I don't have to worry about forgetting to leave the cap off. But I still occasionally forget to turn it off.
 

yummy fur

Well-Known Member
Micro planet technically because of its size and weird orbit.
A “dwarf planet,” as defined by the IAU, is a celestial body in direct orbit of the Sun that is massive enough that its shape is controlled by gravitational forces rather than mechanical forces (and is thus ellipsoid in shape), but has not cleared its neighboring region of other objects.

So, the three criteria of the IAU for a full-sized planet are:

  1. It is in orbit around the Sun.
  2. It has sufficient mass to assume hydrostatic equilibrium (a nearly round shape).
  3. It has "cleared the neighborhood" around its orbit.
Pluto meets only two of these criteria, losing out on the third. In all the billions of years it has lived there, it has not managed to clear its neighborhood. You may wonder what that means, “not clearing its neighboring region of other objects?” Sounds like a minesweeper in space! This means that the planet has become gravitationally dominant -- there are no other bodies of comparable size other than its own satellites or those otherwise under its gravitational influence, in its vicinity in space.

So any large body that does not meet these criteria is now classed as a “dwarf planet,” and that includes Pluto, which shares its orbital neighborhood with Kuiper belt objects such as the plutinos.

https://www.loc.gov/rr/scitech/mysteries/pluto.html
 

giglewigle

Well-Known Member
Idk it’s wierd all the shit I used to stress so mutch over like I’m trying not to give to fucks this round gunna pop a bean or two once it heats up more this heat ain’t shit hay side note any one recommend a good clip on fan for air flow think the one I got is a cheap one it’s starting to come apart
 

Bongsmoke420

Well-Known Member
A “dwarf planet,” as defined by the IAU, is a celestial body in direct orbit of the Sun that is massive enough that its shape is controlled by gravitational forces rather than mechanical forces (and is thus ellipsoid in shape), but has not cleared its neighboring region of other objects.

So, the three criteria of the IAU for a full-sized planet are:

  1. It is in orbit around the Sun.
  2. It has sufficient mass to assume hydrostatic equilibrium (a nearly round shape).
  3. It has "cleared the neighborhood" around its orbit.
Pluto meets only two of these criteria, losing out on the third. In all the billions of years it has lived there, it has not managed to clear its neighborhood. You may wonder what that means, “not clearing its neighboring region of other objects?” Sounds like a minesweeper in space! This means that the planet has become gravitationally dominant -- there are no other bodies of comparable size other than its own satellites or those otherwise under its gravitational influence, in its vicinity in space.

So any large body that does not meet these criteria is now classed as a “dwarf planet,” and that includes Pluto, which shares its orbital neighborhood with Kuiper belt objects such as the plutinos.

https://www.loc.gov/rr/scitech/mysteries/pluto.html
I’m not trolling you but we don’t need a copy and paste from Wikipedia everytime someone needs correcting.... do u correct your friends In real life?
 

2easy

Well-Known Member
Tyson is one of the few TTC Lecturers that makes my ears bleed. Pluto was demoted not by Tyson but by consensus. Basically it was realised that there are lots of things out there some bigger than Pluto. It's not really a planet when the formation of the other planets is looked at, it just got captured later on and seemed like a planet because no one at the time knew about the other stuff that was out there.
Pluto was reclassified as a dwarf planet because it does not fit one of the three criteria for being a planet. It has not cleared its own space. The planets are large enough that they will impact with and swallow everything else in their orbit.
Pluto has not done that.

Edit replied for reading the rest of the posts
 
Top