Ok. Let me present an analogy. Picture a young relative of yours, a baby perhaps. This child is in an accident and goes into a coma. The doctor says there is a very good chance that the child will come out of the coma in about 7 months and be 100% ok. The child will be a burden on the mother and the family until they wake up. Is it morally acceptable to pull the plug on the child?
I wouldn't call wanting to take women's rights "nice and generous" or "confident"
*The shit.
The crack of my ass gets more sun than that wispy gimp in your Avi.
More sun would be nice. Wouldn't turn it down. Smells good to me.
Bad analogy. Not even close to forcing a woman to carry full term.
can the coma kill the woman?
Yes your right, but some things can be made fair.
Ok. The family with the coma child is on the move, on foot in a post apocalyptic wasteland. Defending yourself from feral dogs and zombies is more difficult while dragging the child on a sledge. Also, the mother must keep an IV running from her arm into the child's for the entire coma period. There is a very good chance that in around 7 months, the child will be 100% ok. Is it morally acceptable to pull the plug on the child?
eat my poop
Some people’s fuckery is another’s obligation to help pay for things they use by paying taxes to use them. Like health care, roads, schools, to name a few. And yes the government does place restrictions on what we do and they are not exempt as they are held accountable. Keep on spouting your bullshit and I’ll keep calling it what it is bullshit. You still haven’t answered the question I asked have you? Do you think a 21 year old should be punished if he/she has intercourse with a 12 year old? Easy question yes or no.
I accept your surrender.
Yes it is if it means the survival of the family is dependant on not pulling the kid around IMO. But they would probably sacrifice themselves to keep the kid alive, whatever they do I would feel extremely sorry for them having to make whatever decision they made and would not judge them unlike you who would call them immoral. I applaud women who are strong enough to make the decision required.
Your analogy takes place after she deals with safety and the ravages that child bearing has on the woman's body. Understand the basis of this argument is about a woman's right to decide what happens with her own body.
It is an emotional story. I understand, you're too choked up to answer the question. Take your time.
pretty smug for a racist loser who no one likes
During times of stress due to famine, drought, war, domestic partner's abuse, experiencing homelessness and others, the frequency of miscarriages goes up, way up. This is a survival response by the mother's body to ensure her survival. Is it wrong for this to be a natural response? Better that both die, i guess.