HLG-150H-36
Or the elg 150 36
I think the only major difference is efficiency and money.
Elg is like 90% hlg is like 93%
I was looking at it myself, i think the difference between the HLG and the ELG is also that the HLG has a built in potentiometer that lets you adjust the current, on this particular driver it lets you adjust it from 2.5a-4.2a. On a ELG driver i think you need a dimmer connected seperately.
So i have been so confused by all of this, because i was thinking the HLG-150H-36 would blow the qb132 lights because it maxes at 4200mA while the boards can only take 2000mA each. But according to the youtube video
@verticalgrow linked thats not what happends with CV+CC drivers, What happends is the voltage stays constant, and when you wire the two qb132 boards in paralell what happends is the two boards pull 2000mA each and the driver then has 200mA to spare.
And what would happend if i put a 3rd board onto the same driver is the 3 boards would get 4200mA divided by 3, and then the driver would adjust the voltage to compensate.
I think thats correct. correct me if im wrong anyone.
So what i want to do is get a HLG-150-36H and wire the two boards in paralell, and then i can adjust the current with the built in potentiometer on the driver to dim the lights down, and i dont have to worry about dimming them too high and blowing the lights since the boards wont pull any more than
2000mA anyways.
This would be different if it was a constant current driver, if it was a constant current driver at 4200mA then i would have to wire a minimum of 3 boards on it so that it wouldnt blow the boards right?
i think i understand this correctly but i dont feel confident at all lol