MichiganMedGrower
Well-Known Member
You are pretty dumb for the highest iq in the country guy.
Wrong about pretty much everything you say here.
white male with Assault Rifle-15 (AR15) kills 4
- Thread starter UncleBuck
- Start date
You are pretty dumb for the highest iq in the country guy.
Wrong about pretty much everything you say here.
apollo4201982
Well-Known Member
Found bucks reason for the rooted hate of this gun.
MichiganMedGrower
Well-Known Member
They aren’t sharks they are wanna be’s
You’ll have to excuse him he’s on breastfeeding/diaper duty..
trippnface
Well-Known Member
Too stupid to even write the Thread title proper.
Zero hope
Zero hope
trippnface
Well-Known Member
trippnface
Well-Known Member
The terrorist Military
UncleBuck
Well-Known Member
trippnface
Well-Known Member
trippnface
Well-Known Member
Pay attention, Buck:
"Except no assault weapons that were not already banned were banned. In the Vietnam/Post Vietnam era, if a rifle doesn’t have a bayonet stud, detachable box magazine and SELECT Fire-Semi/Auto/Burst, then it ain’t an assault weapon. It’s a sporting rifle.
Not one country in the world that I know of has EVER used an AR15 as its Infantry Weapon.
If you want to understand how an assault weapon is truly defined, read “On Infantry” by John English and/or “Infantry Attacks” by Irwin Rommel. Both books have a section on the battlefield environment “the last 300 yards to the objective.” There they posit requirements for Infantry weapons...lightweight, bayonet, high rate of fire.
Taking those requirements back in time, we can see that in:
1776, The assault Rifle of the day, was the Brown Bess Musket
In War1, the US Assault Rifle was the bolt action Springfield ‘03
In War2, the M1 Garand...which incidentally actually used a clip, not a box magazine.
Vietnam: M16
Today: M4
At no time did the US Military use an AR15.
The point is, defining assault rifles has two components: features and era in use. "
"Except no assault weapons that were not already banned were banned. In the Vietnam/Post Vietnam era, if a rifle doesn’t have a bayonet stud, detachable box magazine and SELECT Fire-Semi/Auto/Burst, then it ain’t an assault weapon. It’s a sporting rifle.
Not one country in the world that I know of has EVER used an AR15 as its Infantry Weapon.
If you want to understand how an assault weapon is truly defined, read “On Infantry” by John English and/or “Infantry Attacks” by Irwin Rommel. Both books have a section on the battlefield environment “the last 300 yards to the objective.” There they posit requirements for Infantry weapons...lightweight, bayonet, high rate of fire.
Taking those requirements back in time, we can see that in:
1776, The assault Rifle of the day, was the Brown Bess Musket
In War1, the US Assault Rifle was the bolt action Springfield ‘03
In War2, the M1 Garand...which incidentally actually used a clip, not a box magazine.
Vietnam: M16
Today: M4
At no time did the US Military use an AR15.
The point is, defining assault rifles has two components: features and era in use. "
UncleBuck
Well-Known Member
MichiganMedGrower
Well-Known Member
No as usual you are wrong. Do you actually know anything about anything or have you just kept talking over everyone your whole life?
MichiganMedGrower
Well-Known Member
trippnface
Well-Known Member
I frequent quite a few different forums on various topics, and Buck is honestly the biggest troll I think I have ever ecountered.
He must be top CTR material
UncleBuck
Well-Known Member
MichiganMedGrower
Well-Known Member
No buck. It doesn’t. It is not an assault rifle or War weapon at all.
Discredited here forever buck.
MichiganMedGrower
Well-Known Member
So are you.
UncleBuck
Well-Known Member
You are a serial pathological liar so no one cares what you say
Ar15 stands for assault rifle 15