Florida is set to arm teachers

[Roger A. Shrubber]

That is an asinine thought you have going there. It basically means for a person to be secure in their own home, they must be forced to pay for ideas that others hold, and fund a service that they don't use, don't want and may disagree with.

You aren't concerned with responsibility, you are concerned with how to justify your own irresponsible violation of other people and how to justify theft to fund things that you like. Then you have the audacity to whine about gun control, while your bloody hand is busy shooting people who object to your robbery. Twisted. thuggish behavior.

you live in this country. you use the roads, the infrastructure, the power grid, and emergency services. but you don't want to pay for them. you're a leech. you use freedom as an excuse to be a cheap fuck. if you don't like the rules, move somewhere that you do like the rules.
good luck finding a country with no property taxes...if you do find one, good luck staying alive there

 

[Rob Roy]

you live in this country. you use the roads, the infrastructure, the power grid, and emergency services. but you don't want to pay for them. you're a leech. you use freedom as an excuse to be a cheap fuck. if you don't like the rules, move somewhere that you do like the rules.
good luck finding a country with no property taxes...if you do find one, good luck staying alive there

I had hoped you might be able to discuss things as they are rather than presenting some sort of cognitive dissonance based emotional argument to try to rationalize your acceptance of guns being used inappropriately by "authority". Somehow you seem to think that makes it right, because it is normal and therefore "good" when "authority" does it.

Here let me address your silly attempt to make an argument...

I have no problem paying for that which I willingly contract for and use. Forcing people to pay for things they don't use, is a form of slavery though, since it insists that the fruit of your labor is directed by another person who has threatened harm to you if you don't comply. So why do you embrace slavery is the relevant question?

Also, if you are against offensive use of guns, (you're not really) it sure sounds like you are embracing the idea that some people magically have a right to use them offensively and somehow it isn't really the same bad act as if it was you or I doing it.

...and you claim you aren't indoctrinated? Now, who's being funny?

 

[Flowki]

1: What if a student gets hold of a teachers gun. They may not do as much damage but you have increased the chance across a nation of multiple smaller scale killings. People who may not have had any access to guns now have one within 20 feet of them, daily. Are the guns locked away in a safe?.. yeah that's just what you need when a nut job kid opens fire in your class ''hold fire kid.. just got to access my safe so I can shoot you''.

2: What if a teacher goes nuts?. Half the class is dead before the teacher next door gets there, assuming he/she is not too scared to act. They are not trained and acclimatized to the fear on a daily basis so they won't react like a trained officer. That's why cops are cops and teachers are teachers.

This isn't rocket science the people pushing this shit forward know it will have 0 effect on safety. All it does is helps them sell more guns.

 

[schuylaar]

While I don't agree with just the general arming of "teachers", what if they had access to a gun in a safe in case of emergency, one that only they knew the combination to.

If they are going to arm teachers I'd rather have it be that than just a gun in a fucking holster that is retarded as fuck.

uber dropped him off at 2:19 by 2:50 he was at walmart having a cold soda..dicking around with a combination lock?

http://time.com/5162936/florida-high-school-shooting-timeline/

 

[Rob Roy]

1: What if a student gets hold of a teachers gun. They may not do as much damage but you have increased the chance across a nation of multiple smaller scale killings. People who may not have had any access to guns now have one within 20 feet of them, daily. Are the guns locked away in a safe?.. yeah that's just what you need when a nut job kid opens fire in your class ''hold fire kid.. just got to access my safe so I can shoot you''.

2: What if a teacher goes nuts?. Half the class is dead before the teacher next door gets there, assuming he/she is not too scared to act. They are not trained and acclimatized to the fear on a daily basis so they won't react like a trained officer. That's why cops are cops and teachers are teachers.

This isn't rocket science the people pushing this shit forward know it will have 0 effect on safety. All it does is helps them sell more guns.

Did you just insinuate that cops will save the day and protect people? That's really funny.

 

[UncleBuck]

That is an asinine thought you have going there. It basically means for a person to be secure in their own home, they must be forced to pay for ideas that others hold, and fund a service that they don't use, don't want and may disagree with.

You aren't concerned with responsibility, you are concerned with how to justify your own irresponsible violation of other people and how to justify theft to fund things that you like. Then you have the audacity to whine about gun control, while your bloody hand is busy shooting people who object to your robbery. Twisted. thuggish behavior.

no one forced you to sign the contract to buy a house.

now take responsibility for your own actions, pedo

 

[UncleBuck]

you are illiterate ?

that is definitely how an american asks that question, and not some kind of dead giveaway by some virgin retarded boy from russia

 

[Rob Roy]

no one forced you to sign the contract to buy a house.

now take responsibility for your own actions, pedo

I wonder why you seem opposed to the KKK, but then you advocate disarming black people just like they did.

You got a white sheet hanging in your closet, Poopy Pants?

 

[UncleBuck]

I wonder why you seem opposed to the KKK, but then you advocate disarming black people just like they did.

You got a white sheet hanging in your closet, Poopy Pants?

i advocate for disarming all people.

thanks for trying once again. tell us more about how it is "polite and reasonable" to hang signs disallowing black people from your place of business.

 

[Rob Roy]

i advocate for disarming all people.

thanks for trying once again. tell us more about how it is "polite and reasonable" to hang signs disallowing black people from your place of business.

No, you don't advocate for disarming all people. Because to do so, you will need to empower at least some people to enforce your law and they will use guns to do it.

It is polite and reasonable to notice people how you chose to use your property, but not very polite to align with the KKK and advocate disarming black people, like you do.

Someday, maybe, you will win, but not today.

 

[UncleBuck]

It is polite and reasonable to notice people how you chose to use your property, but not very polite to align with the KKK

it is not polite or reasonable at all to hang racial segregation signs, as you advocate for. the KKK advocates for the same thing you do. the KKK does not advocate for disarming all people,as i do

your arguments are shitty. i'd be embarrassed

 

[Excessive_Toker]

it is not polite or reasonable at all to hang racial segregation signs, as you advocate for. the KKK advocates for the same thing you do. the KKK does not advocate for disarming all people,as i do

your arguments are shitty. i'd be embarrassed

All people? Including government employees?

 

[Fogdog]

All people? Including government employees?

bots should be banned

 

[UncleBuck]

All people? Including government employees?

everyone on earth

 

[Excessive_Toker]

everyone on earth

What a world that would be, huh? I love that idea. Can I have a unicorn?

 

[UncleBuck]

What a world that would be, huh? I love that idea. Can I have a unicorn?

you are a bot

 

[whitebb2727]

I liked your list of measures to reduce gun homicides and stole it. It's a good start.

I'm ok with adding buy backs to the list. I don't want them mandatory.

Pay a fair market value for them and it will keep a few guns from ending up on the black market. I've seen guns at garage sales and similar where people inherit guns and don't want them.

I want people that are capable to own guns to do so. I also don't want guns in the hands of dangerous people.

 

[907cannabis]

uber dropped him off at 2:19 by 2:50 he was at walmart having a cold soda..dicking around with a combination lock?

http://time.com/5162936/florida-high-school-shooting-timeline/

Lol does it take you more than 30 seconds to open a lock? I know it doesn't for me... This is besides the point though, I said I'd rather not I want. Big difference.

I want people to just get along but that's not going to happen, I'd like idiots and criminals to turn in their guns too, but that's not happening either.

In the case that it had to happen, what about a thumb ID and voice combo lock.

 

[Fogdog]

I'm ok with adding buy backs to the list. I don't want them mandatory.

Pay a fair market value for them and it will keep a few guns from ending up on the black market. I've seen guns at garage sales and similar where people inherit guns and don't want them.

I want people that are capable to own guns to do so. I also don't want guns in the hands of dangerous people.

The objective is to reduce gun homicides, mass shootings and accidents, not to take guns away. Based on that, there is no reason why a peaceful person (meaning way more than most gun owners) shouldn't keep their guns. Voluntary buy-backs, sure, once the gun market is properly under control. We don't want people stealing guns and selling them to the govt.

 

[Flowki]

Did you just insinuate that cops will save the day and protect people? That's really funny.

Are you insinuating every police officer has no desire to protect people?. Be careful, because that blind stereo typing gets interesting when we shift from a faceless organization....