Fogdog
Well-Known Member
LOL
I know this is very hard for you and all but it's time to accept that the Democratic party's majority did not want Bernie to be their candidate in 2016.
LOL
The majority of the money surely didn't.LOL
I know this is very hard for you and all but it's time to accept that the Democratic party's majority did not want Bernie to be their candidate in 2016.
Is this where you complain about Democrats in Arizona when the party in power and runs the elections are entirely Republican?This is not the product of a foreign power meddling in our electoral system, this is homegrown.
Those who know their agenda isn't supported by the majority will turn to suppressing the votes of the opposition. This is the naked face of authoritarianism.
zounds.https://www.salon.com/2016/03/24/a_...ted_massive_lines_and_turned_many_voters_away
In Maricopa County, polling locations were reduced 70 percent — from 200 polling places to only 60 — since 2012. This left one polling place for every 21,000 voters. As a result, the Maricopa County voters who managed to stay waited for up to five hours to cast their ballots. Voters registered as Democrats showed up to the polls to find their status changed to Independent, and other voters who had changed their status by the official deadline from Independent to a listed party were told their status had not changed. Many voters received new voter ID cards in the mail on Election Day, with some of the cards containing information that established them in a new district and thus with a new polling place.
so what did it come down to eventually between clinton and the pedo? 17,000 votes? jus sayin
tbh i think it's known that not only states were infiltrated, but votes changed..they're scared as shit to tell us.
Take responsibility for your own fantasies.Is this where you complain about Democrats in Arizona when the party in power and runs the elections are entirely Republican?
zounds.
Those Republicans sure did fuck up the election.
Clinton won in spite of Republican meddling.
yep, that big money sure did buy the black brown and women's vote. You haven't yet explained why white men aren't affected.The majority of the money surely didn't.
Republicans control the election process in Arizona. It was the governor's appointee (both republicans) who made those decisions about polling places and forcing people to re-register. Explain please how this is Democrats fault.Take responsibility for your own fantasies.
Bernie was outspent by 4:1 and came close to the nomination.yep, that big money sure did buy the black brown and women's vote. You haven't yet explained why white men aren't affected.
Something else I don't understand. Bernie and Hillary spent the same amount. Bernie spent 220 million on his campaign. As of July 1, Clinton spent the same amount. I mean, wow, Bernie spent the same amount but lost by 12% margin. He must have been an awful campaigner. That, or he wasn't very good at running his campaign.
https://www.opensecrets.org/pres16/candidate?id=n00000528
https://www.bloomberg.com/politics/...l-campaign-fundraising/july/public/index.html
NopeBernie was outspent by 4:1 and came close to the nomination.
Do your own homework.
LolNope
They spent the same. about 220 million.
He lost by 12% difference. Not even close.
The only group where he gained a majority vote was white men.
These are facts. I posted links to my sources for the money spent. Do your own fucking homework or read what was spoon fed to you. I don't care.. These are facts that are verifiable and aren't refutable.
From these facts I draw a conclusion that you may refute because reasonable people may disagree even from the same facts..
Bernie wasn't a very good candidate.
You were the one who talked about how big money swung the election. I just pointed out that:Lol
If he was such a bad candidate, why is he still the most popular sitting politician in America?
Once again you got your cherry picked facts mixed up with your opinions and the mixture is as appetizing as what the cat threw up.
LOL
I know this is very hard for you and all but it's time to accept that the Democratic party's majority did not want Bernie to be their candidate in 2016.
Is this where you complain about Democrats in Arizona when the party in power and runs the elections are entirely Republican?
zounds.
Those Republicans sure did fuck up the election.
Clinton won in spite of Republican meddling.
yep, that big money sure did buy the black brown and women's vote. You haven't yet explained why white men aren't affected.
Something else I don't understand. Bernie and Hillary spent the same amount. Bernie spent 220 million on his campaign. As of July 1, Clinton spent the same amount. I mean, wow, Bernie spent the same amount but lost by 12% margin. He must have been an awful campaigner. That, or he wasn't very good at running his campaign.
https://www.opensecrets.org/pres16/candidate?id=n00000528
https://www.bloomberg.com/politics/...l-campaign-fundraising/july/public/index.html
Republicans control the election process in Arizona. It was the governor's appointee (both republicans) who made those decisions about polling places and forcing people to re-register. Explain please how this is Democrats fault.
You were the one who talked about how big money swung the election. I just pointed out that:
Bernie and Hillary spent the same amount.
Bernie only managed to get the white male majority.
Can you refute these facts?
In light of the fact that Bernie spent the same amount as Hillary, how can you claim that big money swung the election?
You were the one who talked about how big money swung the election. I just pointed out that:
Bernie and Hillary spent the same amount.
Bernie only managed to get the white male majority.
Can you refute these facts?
In light of the fact that Bernie spent the same amount as Hillary, how can you claim that big money swung the election?
the Independent party should have nominated Bernie. oh wait, there isn't a viable one.and that's why she cheated because the Democratic party's majority did not want Bernie to be their candidate in 2016.
I'm looking forward to your explanation why black people only voted for Bernie at 20%, Hispanic at 30% and women at 45% while only white men voted for Bernie at 60%.that is why based upon crowd size..i find the dem primary outcome, suspect.
Many probably didn't like either candidate. Many were stopped by voting laws. I think we all can say was much more charismatic as Obama and fair or not, carried less negative baggage. That said, she did as well as her husband did and almost exactly as well as Kerry did. I don't understand what you are trying to say here.2M black populace OBAMA voters stayed home. why?
tty was making a claim that big money made the difference. He also falsely claimed Bernie spent 20% of what Clinton did. Both Clinton and Bernie spent the same. He lost.Bernie's dollars were grassroots donors aka citizens who he planned on working for..clinton? not so much. she'd never be able to replicate this little important fact.