No, they expanded the "walls" of the prison to include the entire country in England.is that what happened in japan and england and elsewhere? they got sent to prison camps?
It doesn't make violence more likely, this has been said a million times over, it makes gun violence more likely. You make great points yes government has killed a lot of people with guns, also stopped mass killings wth guns, and the list goes on. This doesn't change the fact that guns will be used less in events of anger if there are less of them available and used less by kids in school if they can't legally buy them.If it is true that the presence of guns in peoples hands makes violence more likely why should guns be consolidated in the hands of the people in government?
There is empirical evidence that government people with guns have killed far more people than non government people ever have...
the united kingdom is not one large prison.No, they expanded the "walls" of the prison to include the entire country in England.
Japan is occupied militarily by Americans using guns in an offensive manner.
Not to mention FDR, your hero, put Americans of Japanese ancestry in prison camps just like you would have done to Jewish people who tried to keep weapons or black people who tried to keep weapons. So we know governments can't be trusted to be the only ones with guns don't we?
Enforcing rules which are arbitrary and violate individual rights to self determine makes the enforcer the bad guy.well, if you have to have someone enforce the rules, and they have to be armed, why don't we cut out the middlemen?View attachment 4101462
Who's the bad guys again? Do you think the American government is going to disarm you so they can kill you with guns?Enforcing rules which are arbitrary and violate individual rights to self determine makes the enforcer the bad guy.
Why consolidate guns in the hands of bad guys?
It doesn't make violence more likely, this has been said a million times over, it makes gun violence more likely. You make great points yes government has killed a lot of people with guns, also stopped mass killings wth guns, and the list goes on. This doesn't change the fact that guns will be used less in events of anger if there are less of them available and used less by kids in school if they can't legally buy them.
There's a lot of misunderstandings here, only extremists want to take all guns away I think, others promote the ban of new sales of ar-15s/semi autos/loophole sales, magazine sizes and shit like keeping domestic abusers from owning them and better background checks.
Criminals will be criminals but with less guns and stricter laws its a step in the right direction.
Read the bills people are proposing, read them slowly and don't miss anything.
If people disobey them, are you saying that ultimately they WON'T kill you? Please elaborate.Who's the bad guys again? Do you think the American government is going to disarm you so they can kill you with guns?
Is that a tv show featuring cops as heroes or some other fantasy like that or is it a cherry picked stat or something?Has this guy never seen crime rate drop before?
Kingdom?the united kingdom is not one large prison.
you really need to seek help
Oh, I'm so glad we agree that self determination should be respected.maybe that's just your perception? maybe people aren't to be trusted, and that's why there's a need for law enforcement officers to begin with. there's a limit to self determination. we live in a society, like it or not, and unless you want to totally withdraw from it and live off the grid in isolation, you have to follow the rules like everyone else. i'm not in favor of taking away peoples weapons, nor am i in favor of arming teachers. i'm quite interested in how many teachers in florida are interested in being armed? i would imagine a high number of teachers have no interest in it what so ever. so are we violating their right to self determination?
he thinks someone with a gun is forcing him to pay property taxes even though he voluntarily agreed to pay themwhere do they use guns to fund schools? you said that before, but never elaborated
and how do you know what i support? maybe i'm just playing devil's advocate, because i'm curious where this can go?
First question = Connect the dots please.where do they use guns to fund schools? you said that before, but never elaborated
and how do you know what i support? maybe i'm just playing devil's advocate, because i'm curious where this can go?
You go to great lengths to rationalize theft.he thinks someone with a gun is forcing him to pay property taxes even though he voluntarily agreed to pay them
it's not theft, you willingly signed a contract agreeing to pay property taxes ya fucking moochYou go to great lengths to rationalize theft.
I sure am glad black people aren't considered to be property by most of us, so why would you go back to your klanman policies and forcibly disarm them ?
You abuse the term voluntarily also, you're not abusive at home are you ? Does your cat feel safe?
it's not theft, you willingly signed a contract agreeing to pay property taxes ya fucking mooch