makes perfect sense. attacking voting rights means less people of color being able to vote. and people of color overwhelmingly won't vote for a racist like ron paul (or any other republican for that matter)
again, newsletter not written by him, his name used and voting against government mandated mlk day doesnt mean he was against mlk or civil rights
I don't think you are nit picking, I think you are expanding on what I said. Or maybe not what I said but what I meant to say. buzzed and all that. So, let's go back to my saying I don't think there has ever been a free market. How does that differ from your saying our current system is controlled by the government? In a practical sense, "markets" outside of small villages don't exist without governing authority to protect trade routes, set standards and prevent manipulation that quite quickly leads to monopoly. Markets in the larger sense depend upon trust which requires people to behave according to a set of agreed upon rules. The government's role is to set down and then enforce the rules. Therefore, there can never be a free market.
he literally had his own "ron paul" sub forum on stormfront. we are not making any of this up.
I voted for Bernie and wouldn't now that I know him better so there is that. Bernie would not have been a good president to lead on issues of social justice including Black and women's issues. He would have been great for white people and not bad for everybody else but they would have felt invisible to his administration.
I think we have a little more than semantics going on, but not by much. I would say that the "free-market" people themselves don't even know that feudalism would be the end state of their economic model. That has definitely been tried. That is the model in which the land owners had all the power. These goons don't really get that so they just argue that there should be no gov't intervention in trade and markets, ignoring that what land owners do is essentially what gov'ts do now. They draw lines on a map and say "this is mine" and then proceed to extract resources from the earth while exploiting the very laborers creating all the wealth. In their "pure" system, there would be no state, the land owners themselves would simply construct private roads and employ private armies.
OK, then why keep defending him and saying we're all just lying and the huge list of evidence that he is racist as fuck is lies. Just say you didn't know and you supported him for other reasons until you found out or something. You seemed to have had a meltdown over the news that he is racist, then began the 5 stages of grief. You started with denial, then went on to anger and now you're bargaining. Relax, gringo.