Proposed pot regulations open door to craft growers, licensing non-violent offenders

VIANARCHRIS

Well-Known Member
https://www.canada.ca/en/health-canada/programs/consultation-proposed-approach-regulation-cannabis.html

Federal Health Minister Ginette Petitpas Taylor has released the Liberal government's proposed cannabis regulations, opening the door to craft marijuana producers, allowing low-risk offenders to participate in the industry and offering some leeway on packaging.

Canadians have until Jan. 20 to offer opinions either through an online questionnaire or by providing a written submission on the measures before they are implemented.

"This proposed regulatory approach is informed by the extensive consultations to date, and it supports our overarching goal of protecting public health and safety," the minister said in a statement. "We look forward to hearing the views of Canadians from across the country."

The proposed regulations set out how the federal government will restrict and control the production and distribution of marijuana once it becomes legal in July 2018.

The six broad areas that will be subject to government regulations include: licensing, security clearances, cannabis tracking, cannabis products, packaging and labelling, medical marijuana and health and cosmetic products that use cannabis.




The proposals also open the door to increasing the number and types of products available for sale in an effort to displace the illegal market.

"Additional product forms could include, for example, pre-rolled cannabis and vaporization cartridges manufactured with dried cannabis," the proposals say. "Product forms for cannabis oil, such as cannabis oil capsules, oral sprays, and cannabis oil intended for topical application, would continue to be permitted."

These products come with maximum levels of THC, the active ingredient in marijuana products, and include:

  • Single-use products such as pre-rolled joints that can contain no more than one gram of dried cannabis.
  • A single-use edible cannabis product such as a capsule should not contain any more than 10 milligrams of THC per capsule or dose of spray.
  • Cannabis oil subject to a 30 milligram per millilitre limit of THC concentration.
The THC concentration of products for inhalation will, however, not face limitations beyond the natural THC level of the plant.
 

GroErr

Well-Known Member
I like the idea of craft growers.
If you can brew your own beer then there should be no difference.

Probably cost an arm and a leg for a licence so most people won't be able to afford it nevermind the overhead to get started. Hopefully not though.
Nice that they're thinking of opening it up. A quick scan of the regulations and this isn't a basement grow op, it'll take some serious money to get in on it but at least it's an option. Lot's of rules and procedures much like LP's, security, monitoring, tons of paperwork/filings, no direct to consumer sales means selling to LP's, other craft growers, test labs etc.
 

Jay p123

Well-Known Member
Nice that they're thinking of opening it up. A quick scan of the regulations and this isn't a basement grow op, it'll take some serious money to get in on it but at least it's an option. Lot's of rules and procedures much like LP's, security, monitoring, tons of paperwork/filings, no direct to consumer sales means selling to LP's, other craft growers, test labs etc.
Ya I was also thinking of the jobs that would be created by mom and pop shops being able to operate.
 

WHATFG

Well-Known Member
The six broad areas that will be subject to government regulations include: licensing, security clearances, cannabis tracking, cannabis products, packaging and labelling, medical marijuana and health and cosmetic products that use cannabis.
....health and cosmetic products that use cannabis....isn't that medical?....and cosmetics...hmmmm....I'm otherwise happy for the small growers that can get in.
 

gb123

Well-Known Member
Canada is being dragged towards sanity in cannabis laws, kicking and screaming every centimeter of the way.

It's a lovely sight to behold.
AS we've said it would for the last 4 years now :lol:

funny how it goes with the courts pushin them all the way too..
 

WHATFG

Well-Known Member
Right now I can't get my head around why there would be ANY need for drugs in cosmetics....that smells kinda funny to me....just sayin'...
 

WHATFG

Well-Known Member
Very true!

At least MMAR stands. Noticed in the survey they had no mention of MMAR only ACMPR.
I guess they forgot about us MMAR folks... :)
Oh no they haven't....lol....we're getting smaller by the day though...that injuction will be lifted...and the argument will be that there is a valid medical program...
 
Top